David J Gazeley1, Supraja Yeturi2, Payal J Patel2, Ann K Rosenthal3. 1. Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W, Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226. Electronic address: dgazeley@mcw.edu. 2. Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W, Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226. 3. Zablocki VA Medical Service, Milwaukee, WI.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Erosive osteoarthritis (EOA) is a commonly invoked diagnosis representing an important variant of hand osteoarthritis (OA). There is increasing literature on the prevalence, risk factors, etiology, and management of EOA. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the literature to assess variability in the diagnostic definitions used to define EOA in these studies. RESULTS: We reviewed 336 articles and found 62 articles citing diagnostic definitions for EOA. Radiographic appearance was the most commonly used criterion, but there was little agreement on the details or extent of the radiographic changes. Overall, 56 of the 62 studies included clinical features in the diagnostic definitions, yet these features varied considerably. Exclusion criteria were mentioned in 43 of the studies. CONCLUSION: Based on the widely disparate definitions of EOA, we urge caution in interpretation of this literature, and propose that further understanding of EOA will require consensus on its definition.
BACKGROUND:Erosive osteoarthritis (EOA) is a commonly invoked diagnosis representing an important variant of hand osteoarthritis (OA). There is increasing literature on the prevalence, risk factors, etiology, and management of EOA. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the literature to assess variability in the diagnostic definitions used to define EOA in these studies. RESULTS: We reviewed 336 articles and found 62 articles citing diagnostic definitions for EOA. Radiographic appearance was the most commonly used criterion, but there was little agreement on the details or extent of the radiographic changes. Overall, 56 of the 62 studies included clinical features in the diagnostic definitions, yet these features varied considerably. Exclusion criteria were mentioned in 43 of the studies. CONCLUSION: Based on the widely disparate definitions of EOA, we urge caution in interpretation of this literature, and propose that further understanding of EOA will require consensus on its definition.
Authors: M Vargiolu; T Silvestri; E Bonora; P Dolzani; L Pulsatelli; O Addimanda; L Mancarella; L Punzi; A Fioravanti; A Facchini; G Romeo; R Meliconi Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2010-02-26 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: A G Stern; M R C de Carvalho; G A Buck; R A Adler; T P S Rao; D Disler; G Moxley Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Julie E Davis; Lena F Schaefer; Timothy E McAlindon; Charles B Eaton; Mary B Roberts; Ida K Haugen; Stacy E Smith; Jeffrey Duryea; Bing Lu; Jeffrey B Driban Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Jean-Yves L Reginster; Nigel K Arden; Ida K Haugen; Francois Rannou; Etienne Cavalier; Olivier Bruyère; Jaime Branco; Roland Chapurlat; Sabine Collaud Basset; Nasser M Al-Daghri; Elaine M Dennison; Gabriel Herrero-Beaumont; Andrea Laslop; Burkhard F Leeb; Stefania Maggi; Ouafa Mkinsi; Anton S Povzun; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra; Thierry Thomas; Daniel Uebelhart; Nicola Veronese; Cyrus Cooper Journal: Semin Arthritis Rheum Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Jiří Baloun; Tereza Kropáčková; Hana Hulejová; Michal Tomčík; Olga Růžičková; Olga Šléglová; Jindřiška Gatterová; Jiří Vencovský; Karel Pavelka; Ladislav Šenolt Journal: Biomolecules Date: 2020-12-22