Literature DB >> 27692649

Does the National Resident Match Program Rank List Predict Success in Emergency Medicine Residency Programs?

Michael Van Meter1, Michael Williams1, Rosa Banuelos1, Peter Carlson1, Jeffrey I Schneider2, Bradley D Shy3, Christine Babcock4, Matthew Spencer5, Yashwant Chathampally1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergency medicine (EM) residency programs use nonstandardized criteria to create applicant rank lists. One implicit assumption is that predictive associations exist between an applicant's rank and their future performance as a resident. To date, these associations have not been sufficiently demonstrated.
OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that a strong positive correlation exists between the National Resident Match Program (NRMP) match-list applicant rank, the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 and In-Training Examination (ITE) scores, and the graduating resident rank.
METHODS: A total of 286 residents from five EM programs over a 5-year period were studied. The applicant rank (AR) was derived from the applicant's relative rank list position on each programs' submitted NRMP rank list. The graduation rank (GR) was determined by a faculty consensus committee. GR was then correlated to AR using a Spearman's partial rank correlation. Additional correlations were sought with a ranking of the USMLE Step Score (UR) and the ITE Score (IR).
RESULTS: Combining data for all five programs, weak positive correlations existed between GR and AR, UR, and IR. The majority of correlations ranged between. When comparing GR and AR, there was a weak correlation of 0.13 (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: Our study found only weak correlations between GR and AR, UR, and IR, suggesting that those variables may not be strong predictors of resident performance. This has important implications for EM programs considering the resources devoted to applicant evaluation and ranking.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  education; emergency medicine; predicting success; ranking; residency application; resident performance

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27692649     DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.06.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  5 in total

1.  Critical Appraisal of Emergency Medicine Educational Research: The Best Publications of 2016.

Authors:  Nicole M Dubosh; Jaime Jordan; Lalena M Yarris; Edward Ullman; Joshua Kornegay; Daniel Runde; Amy Miller Juve; Jonathan Fisher
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2018-12-14

2.  A Critical Disconnect: Residency Selection Factors Lack Correlation With Intern Performance.

Authors:  John C Burkhardt; Kendra P Parekh; Fiona E Gallahue; Kory S London; Mary A Edens; A J Humbert; M Tyson Pillow; Sally A Santen; Laura R Hopson
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2020-11-20

3.  Which Applicant Factors Predict Success in Emergency Medicine Training Programs? A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Allen Yang; Chris Gilani; Soheil Saadat; Linda Murphy; Shannon Toohey; Megan Boysen-Osborn
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2020-01-08

4.  Identifying the Emergency Medicine Personality: A Multisite Exploratory Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jaime Jordan; Judith A Linden; Martine C Maculatis; H Gene Hern; Jeffrey I Schneider; Charlotte P Wills; John P Marshall; Alan Friedman; Lalena M Yarris
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2018-01-31

5.  Standardized Video Interviews Do Not Correlate to United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and Step 2 Scores.

Authors:  Daniel J Egan; Abbas Husain; Michael C Bond; William Caputo; Lukasz Cygan; Jeff Van Dermark; Jan M Shoenberger; Ida Li; William Krauss; Jonathan Bronner; Melissa White; Arlene S Chung; Kaushal H Shah; Todd Taylor; Matthew Silver; Brahim Ardolic; Moshe Weizberg
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-12-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.