Literature DB >> 27692423

Determination of soft tissue thickness at orthodontic miniscrew placement sites using ultrasonography for customizing screw selection.

Renu Parmar1, Vijay Reddy2, Satheesh Kumar Reddy2, Deepti Reddy2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A wide variety of factors affect the success of orthodontic miniscrews in clinical situations, including thickness of the soft tissues. Our objectives were to assess area-related and sex-related differences in the soft tissue thicknesses of the buccal attached gingiva of the maxilla and the mandible, and the palatal masticatory mucosa at common orthodontic miniscrew placement sites, and to prescribe a guideline for miniscrew selection for a predictable clinical outcome.
METHODS: The sample consisted of 32 randomly selected adults in the age group of 20 to 25 years. Soft-tissue thickness of the concerned areas was measured intraorally using an A-mode ultrasound transducer probe (Biomedix Optotechnik & Devices, Bangalore, India). Independent t tests, paired t tests, and 1-way analysis of variance with Duncan post hoc tests were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The palatal masticatory mucosa was 2 to 3 times thicker than the corresponding buccal attached gingiva in both sexes. The thickness of the palatal masticatory mucosa in the midpalatal region was consistently less than 1 mm (range, 0.7-1 mm). The buccal attached gingiva was comparatively thicker in the maxilla than in the mandible, except for the mandibular molar regions. It also was found that the buccal attached gingiva was thicker in women in the maxillary anterior regions, whereas, the thickness was greater in the maxillary posterior regions in the men.
CONCLUSIONS: Evaluating the soft tissue thicknesses before selecting an orthodontic miniscrew can help in providing a definite guide for orthodontists to select an appropriate screw in everyday clinical practice, further enhancing the predictability of miniscrew-assisted orthodontics.
Copyright © 2016 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27692423     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.03.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  3 in total

1.  Three dimensional movement analysis of maxillary impacted canine using TADs: a pilot study.

Authors:  Marco Migliorati; Lucia Cevidanes; Giordana Sinfonico; Sara Drago; Domenico Dalessandri; Gaetano Isola; Armando Silvestrini Biavati
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 2.  Revisiting the Complications of Orthodontic Miniscrew.

Authors:  Van Mai Truong; Soyeon Kim; Jaeheon Kim; Joo Won Lee; Young-Seok Park
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.246

3.  Clinical effectiveness of orthodontic miniscrew implantation guided by a novel cone beam CT image-based computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) template.

Authors:  Lingling Qiu; Hui Xu; Pingping Feng; Xiaoyan Sha; Hongwei Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.