Lisa Zubkoff1, Brian Shiner2, Bradley V Watts2. 1. White River Junction VAMC, White River Junction, VT; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH; VA National Center for Patient Safety, White River Junction, VT. Electronic address: lisa.zubkoff@va.gov. 2. White River Junction VAMC, White River Junction, VT; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH; VA National Center for Patient Safety, White River Junction, VT.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Guidelines recommend that substance use disorder (SUD) treatment be available in primary care-mental health integrated clinics, which offer mental and behavioral health assessment and treatment in the primary care setting. Despite this recommendation it is unclear what barriers and facilitators exist to SUD treatment being provided in that setting. This work sought to understand current SUD services in such integrated clinics, explore other services may that be appropriate, and identify barriers to such services. METHODS: We conducted qualitative interviews with 23 staff members from integrated clinics at 6 Veterans Affairs medical centers. We transcribed interviews and performed thematic analysis to identify emergent themes. RESULTS: We identified seven themes affecting staff experience and ability to provide SUD services in the integrated clinic: clinical effectiveness, clinical requirements, regulatory requirements, program goals, proximity of the integrated clinic and SUD services, training on substance use disorder, and role specialization. CONCLUSIONS: VA primary care-mental health integrated clinic staff members do not currently view SUD treatment as the focus of their work, but are open to offering SUD treatment including brief psychological interventions or medication. Several barriers to providing SUD treatment were identified, including the need for additional staff training around appropriate interventions for the integrated clinic setting, additional staffing and space, and a structured implementation strategy to promote the use of SUD treatments. Published by Elsevier Inc.
INTRODUCTION: Guidelines recommend that substance use disorder (SUD) treatment be available in primary care-mental health integrated clinics, which offer mental and behavioral health assessment and treatment in the primary care setting. Despite this recommendation it is unclear what barriers and facilitators exist to SUD treatment being provided in that setting. This work sought to understand current SUD services in such integrated clinics, explore other services may that be appropriate, and identify barriers to such services. METHODS: We conducted qualitative interviews with 23 staff members from integrated clinics at 6 Veterans Affairs medical centers. We transcribed interviews and performed thematic analysis to identify emergent themes. RESULTS: We identified seven themes affecting staff experience and ability to provide SUD services in the integrated clinic: clinical effectiveness, clinical requirements, regulatory requirements, program goals, proximity of the integrated clinic and SUD services, training on substance use disorder, and role specialization. CONCLUSIONS: VA primary care-mental health integrated clinic staff members do not currently view SUD treatment as the focus of their work, but are open to offering SUD treatment including brief psychological interventions or medication. Several barriers to providing SUD treatment were identified, including the need for additional staff training around appropriate interventions for the integrated clinic setting, additional staffing and space, and a structured implementation strategy to promote the use of SUD treatments. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Keywords:
Mental health; Primary health care; Qualitative research; Substance-related disorders; United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Authors: Andrea K Finlay; Laura S Ellerbe; Jessie J Wong; Christine Timko; Anna D Rubinsky; Shalini Gupta; Thomas R Bowe; Jennifer L Burden; Alex H S Harris Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2017-03-10
Authors: Jessica J Wyse; Adam J Gordon; Steven K Dobscha; Benjamin J Morasco; Elizabeth Tiffany; Karen Drexler; Friedhelm Sandbrink; Travis I Lovejoy Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2018 Impact factor: 3.716
Authors: Ida Q Chen; Helene Chokron Garneau; Timothy Seay-Morrison; Megan R Mahoney; Heather Filipowicz; Mark P McGovern Journal: Addict Sci Clin Pract Date: 2020-07-29
Authors: Edith K Wakida; Celestino Obua; Godfrey Z Rukundo; Samuel Maling; Zohray M Talib; Elialilia S Okello Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Edith K Wakida; Elialilia S Okello; Godfrey Z Rukundo; Dickens Akena; Paul E Alele; Zohray M Talib; Celestino Obua Journal: Int J Ment Health Syst Date: 2019-03-22