Cary J Blum1, Lewis S Nelson2, Robert S Hoffman3. 1. New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, USA 10016. Electronic address: Cary.Blum@med.nyu.edu. 2. Division of Medical Toxicology, Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, USA 10016. Electronic address: Lewis.Nelson@nyumc.org. 3. Division of Medical Toxicology, Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, USA 10016. Electronic address: Robert.Hoffman@nyumc.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) have emerged as one tool to combat prescription drug misuse and diversion. New York State mandates that prescribers use its PDMP (called ISTOP) before prescribing controlled substances. We surveyed physicians to assess their experiences with mandatory PDMP use. METHODS: Electronic survey of attending physicians, from multiple clinical specialties, at one large urban academic medical center. RESULTS: Of 207 responding physicians, 89.4% had heard of ISTOP, and of those, 91.1% were registered users. 45.7% of respondents used the system once per week or more. There was significant negative feedback, with 40.4% of respondents describing ISTOP as "rarely" or "never helpful," and 39.4% describing it as "difficult" or "very difficult" to use. Physicians expressed frustration with the login process, the complexity of querying patients, and the lack of integration with electronic medical records. Only 83.1% knew that ISTOP use is mandated in almost all situations. A minority agreed with this mandate (44.2%); surgeons, males, and those who prescribe controlled substances at least once per week had significantly lower rates of agreement (22.6%, 36.2%, and 33.0%, respectively). The most common reasons for disagreement were: time burden, concerns about helpfulness, potential for under-treatment, and erosion of physician autonomy. Emergency physicians, who are largely exempt from the mandate, were the most likely to believe that ISTOP was helpful, yet the least likely to be registered users. 48.4% of non-emergency physicians reported perfect compliance with the mandate; surgeons and males reported significantly lower rates of perfect compliance (18.2% and 36.8%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study offers a unique window into how one academic medical faculty has experienced New York's mandatory PDMP. Many respondents believe that ISTOP is cumbersome and generally unhelpful. Furthermore, many disagree with, and don't comply with, its mandatory use.
BACKGROUND: Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) have emerged as one tool to combat prescription drug misuse and diversion. New York State mandates that prescribers use its PDMP (called ISTOP) before prescribing controlled substances. We surveyed physicians to assess their experiences with mandatory PDMP use. METHODS: Electronic survey of attending physicians, from multiple clinical specialties, at one large urban academic medical center. RESULTS: Of 207 responding physicians, 89.4% had heard of ISTOP, and of those, 91.1% were registered users. 45.7% of respondents used the system once per week or more. There was significant negative feedback, with 40.4% of respondents describing ISTOP as "rarely" or "never helpful," and 39.4% describing it as "difficult" or "very difficult" to use. Physicians expressed frustration with the login process, the complexity of querying patients, and the lack of integration with electronic medical records. Only 83.1% knew that ISTOP use is mandated in almost all situations. A minority agreed with this mandate (44.2%); surgeons, males, and those who prescribe controlled substances at least once per week had significantly lower rates of agreement (22.6%, 36.2%, and 33.0%, respectively). The most common reasons for disagreement were: time burden, concerns about helpfulness, potential for under-treatment, and erosion of physician autonomy. Emergency physicians, who are largely exempt from the mandate, were the most likely to believe that ISTOP was helpful, yet the least likely to be registered users. 48.4% of non-emergency physicians reported perfect compliance with the mandate; surgeons and males reported significantly lower rates of perfect compliance (18.2% and 36.8%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study offers a unique window into how one academic medical faculty has experienced New York's mandatory PDMP. Many respondents believe that ISTOP is cumbersome and generally unhelpful. Furthermore, many disagree with, and don't comply with, its mandatory use.
Keywords:
Controlled substance monitoring; Doctor shopping; Prescription drug monitoring; Prescription drug monitoring program; Prescription monitoring program; Substance use disorder
Authors: Matthew J Witry; Barbara J St Marie; Brahmendra Reddy Viyyuri; Paul D Windschitl Journal: Pain Manag Nurs Date: 2019-05-24 Impact factor: 1.929
Authors: Marcus A Bachhuber; Brendan Saloner; Marc LaRochelle; Jessica S Merlin; Brandon C Maughan; Dan Polsky; Naum Shaparin; Sean M Murphy Journal: Pain Med Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Thomas R Radomski; Felicia R Bixler; Susan L Zickmund; KatieLynn M Roman; Carolyn T Thorpe; Jennifer A Hale; Florentina E Sileanu; Leslie R M Hausmann; Joshua M Thorpe; Katie J Suda; Kevin T Stroupe; Adam J Gordon; Chester B Good; Michael J Fine; Walid F Gellad Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Pierre-Marie Morice; Joachim Alexandre; Alexandre Cesbron; Marion Sassier; Sophie Fedrizzi; Xavier Humbert Journal: Drug Saf Case Rep Date: 2017-12