Rajat Sharma1, Colleen M Norris1, Gabor Gyenes1, Manohara Senaratne2, Kevin R Bainey3. 1. Division of Cardiology, Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 2. Grey Nuns Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 3. Division of Cardiology, Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Electronic address: kevin.bainey@albertahealthservices.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Unequivocally, cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in patients with established cardiovascular disease improves survival. However, its effect on higher-risk ethnic groups has not been explored. Accordingly, we evaluated the effect of CR on South Asian (SA) compared with European Canadians with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Using the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) registry, 26,167 patients from Edmonton, Alberta who received coronary angiography with documented CAD were reviewed (January 2002 to March 2012). After excluding Chinese patients, 1027 SA patients were compared with 11,992 European Canadian patients using validated surname algorithms. Adjustment was performed using a Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Of the SA cohort, 50.6% attended CR, compared with 43.0% of the European Canadian cohort (P < 0.001). After adjustment, CR was associated with long-term survival irrespective of ethnic group (total study population: hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.63; P < 0.001; SA population: HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-0.99; P = 0.045; European population: HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.52-0.63; P < 0.001). When comparing SA vs European Canadians attending CR, improved survival was observed in SA patients (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.40-0.85; P < 0.001). This benefit appeared limited to SA patients who completed CR (complete CR: HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.17-0.85; P = 0.02; incomplete CR: HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.45-1.35; P = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, referral rates to CR remains low but attendance appears higher in SA patients. Among those who attended CR, there is a strong association with improved survival irrespective of ethnic status. In SA patients with CAD, attendance and completion of CR should be strongly endorsed because of its incremental benefit.
BACKGROUND: Unequivocally, cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in patients with established cardiovascular disease improves survival. However, its effect on higher-risk ethnic groups has not been explored. Accordingly, we evaluated the effect of CR on South Asian (SA) compared with European Canadians with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Using the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) registry, 26,167 patients from Edmonton, Alberta who received coronary angiography with documented CAD were reviewed (January 2002 to March 2012). After excluding Chinese patients, 1027 SA patients were compared with 11,992 European Canadian patients using validated surname algorithms. Adjustment was performed using a Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Of the SA cohort, 50.6% attended CR, compared with 43.0% of the European Canadian cohort (P < 0.001). After adjustment, CR was associated with long-term survival irrespective of ethnic group (total study population: hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.63; P < 0.001; SA population: HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-0.99; P = 0.045; European population: HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.52-0.63; P < 0.001). When comparing SA vs European Canadians attending CR, improved survival was observed in SA patients (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.40-0.85; P < 0.001). This benefit appeared limited to SA patients who completed CR (complete CR: HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.17-0.85; P = 0.02; incomplete CR: HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.45-1.35; P = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, referral rates to CR remains low but attendance appears higher in SA patients. Among those who attended CR, there is a strong association with improved survival irrespective of ethnic status. In SA patients with CAD, attendance and completion of CR should be strongly endorsed because of its incremental benefit.
Authors: Carol C Choo; Peter K H Chew; Shuet-Ming Lai; Shuenn-Chiang Soo; Cyrus S Ho; Roger C Ho; Raymond C Wong Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-05-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Reena Karkhanis; Harindra C Wijeysundera; Derrick Y Tam; Paul Oh; David A Alter; Bing Yu; Alex Kiss; Stephen E Fremes Journal: CJC Open Date: 2020-10-12
Authors: Kevin R Bainey; Milan Gupta; Imtiaz Ali; Sripal Bangalore; Maria Chiu; Kendeep Kaila; Padma Kaul; Nadia Khan; Kathryn M King-Shier; Latha Palaniappan; Guillaume Pare; Krish Ramanathan; Stephanie Ross; Baiju R Shah Journal: CJC Open Date: 2019-10-30