Literature DB >> 2769204

Invagination of the otic placode: normal development and experimental manipulation.

S R Hilfer1, R A Esteves, J F Sanzo.   

Abstract

The inner ear forms from paired ectodermal primordia that lie to either side of the developing hindbrain. Initially each primordium forms a shallow depression in the ectodermal surface. Invagination to form an otic pit coincides with the formation of several deep folds in the epithelial surface. An initial fold appears parallel to the embryonic axis and at the junction of the rhombencephalon with somitomeric mesoderm. This is followed by formation of cranial and caudal folds perpendicular to the axis and minor folds that are within the pit formed by earlier folding. The central region of the otic primordium remains in close apposition to the lateral surface of the neural tube during the process of fold formation, until the otic pit becomes quite deep. At that time, mesenchymal cells penetrate between the two layers. Experimental analysis of invagination supports the conclusion that otic invagination is controlled differently from that of similar organ primordia, such as the eye and thyroid. Whereas these other primordia can be stimulated to undergo normal morphogenetic shape changes precociously by treatments that presumably activate motile processes in the cytoskeleton, the same conditions have little effect on the otic placode. Similarly, neither inhibitors of calcium transport nor inactivators of calmodulin activity prevent otic pit formation, while these drugs block invagination of other primordia. These results suggest that otic invagination may be caused by changes in the surrounding tissues rather than by an activation of motility within the primordium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2769204     DOI: 10.1002/jez.1402510213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Zool        ISSN: 0022-104X


  6 in total

1.  Molecular genetics of pattern formation in the inner ear: do compartment boundaries play a role?

Authors:  J V Brigande; A E Kiernan; X Gao; L E Iten; D M Fekete
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The role of the hindbrain in patterning of the otocyst.

Authors:  Daniel Choo
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2007-06-02       Impact factor: 3.582

3.  Slits and Robos in the developing chicken inner ear.

Authors:  Andrea C Battisti; Donna M Fekete
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.780

Review 4.  Apical constriction: a cell shape change that can drive morphogenesis.

Authors:  Jacob M Sawyer; Jessica R Harrell; Gidi Shemer; Jessica Sullivan-Brown; Minna Roh-Johnson; Bob Goldstein
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 3.582

5.  Morphological and quantitative studies in the otic region of the neural tube in chick embryos suggest a neuroectodermal origin for the otic placode.

Authors:  R Mayordomo; L Rodríguez-Gallardo; I S Alvarez
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Pax2 coordinates epithelial morphogenesis and cell fate in the inner ear.

Authors:  Nicolas A D Christophorou; Michael Mende; Laura Lleras-Forero; Timothy Grocott; Andrea Streit
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 3.582

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.