Literature DB >> 27691381

Assessing Telemedicine Utilization by Using Medicaid Claims Data.

Megan Daugherty Douglas1, Junjun Xu1, Akilah Heggs1, Glenda Wrenn1, Dominic H Mack1, George Rust1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study characterized telemedicine utilization among Medicaid enrollees by patients' demographic characteristics, geographic location, enrollment type, eligibility category, and clinical conditions.
METHODS: This study used 2008-2009 Medicaid claims data from 28 states and the District of Columbia to characterize telemedicine claims (indicated by GT for professional fee claims or Q3014 for facility fees) on the basis of patients' demographic characteristics, geographic location, enrollment type, eligibility category, and clinical condition as indicated by ICD-9 codes. States lacking Medicaid telemedicine reimbursement policies were excluded. Chi-square tests were used to compare telemedicine utilization rates and one-way analysis of variance was used to estimate mean differences in number of telemedicine encounters among subgroups.
RESULTS: A total of 45,233,602 Medicaid enrollees from the 22 states with telemedicine reimbursement policies were included in the study, and .1% were telemedicine users. Individuals ages 45 to 64 (16.4%), whites (11.3%), males (8.5%), rural residents (26.0%), those with managed care plans (7.9%), and those categorized as aged, blind, and disabled (28.1%) were more likely to receive telemedicine (p<.001). Nearly 95% of telemedicine claims were associated with a behavioral health diagnosis, of which over 50% were for bipolar disorder and attention-deficit disorder or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (29.3% and 23.4%, respectively). State-level variation was high, ranging from .0 to 59.91 claims per 10,000 enrollees (Arkansas and Arizona, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the touted potential for telemedicine to improve health care access, actual utilization of telemedicine in Medicaid programs was low. It was predominantly used to treat behavioral health diagnoses. Reimbursement alone is insufficient to support broad utilization for Medicaid enrollees.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicaid; Utilization patterns &amp; health policy; review, Telecommunications, Public policy issues; telemedicine; telepsychiatry

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27691381      PMCID: PMC5444290          DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Serv        ISSN: 1075-2730            Impact factor:   3.084


  17 in total

1.  State Medicaid and private payer reimbursement for telemedicine: An overview.

Authors:  Nancy A Brown
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.184

2.  Private payer reimbursement for telemedicine services in the United States.

Authors:  Pamela Whitten; Lorraine Buis
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.536

3.  National telemedicine initiatives: essential to healthcare reform.

Authors:  Rashid L Bashshur; Gary W Shannon; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Jim Grigsby; Joseph C Kvedar; Ronald S Weinstein; Jay H Sanders; Karen S Rheuban; Thomas S Nesbitt; Dale C Alverson; Ronald C Merrell; Jonathan D Linkous; A Stewart Ferguson; Robert J Waters; Max E Stachura; David G Ellis; Nina M Antoniotti; Barbara Johnston; Charles R Doarn; Peter Yellowlees; Steven Normandin; Joseph Tracy
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.536

4.  County-level estimates of mental health professional shortage in the United States.

Authors:  Kathleen C Thomas; Alan R Ellis; Thomas R Konrad; Charles E Holzer; Joseph P Morrissey
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 5.  Telemedicine across borders: a systematic review of factors that hinder or support implementation.

Authors:  Vanessa Saliba; Helena Legido-Quigley; Riina Hallik; Ain Aaviksoo; Josip Car; Martin McKee
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 6.  Telehealth among US hospitals: several factors, including state reimbursement and licensure policies, influence adoption.

Authors:  Julia Adler-Milstein; Joseph Kvedar; David W Bates
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Increased Black-White disparities in mortality after the introduction of lifesaving innovations: a possible consequence of US federal laws.

Authors:  Robert S Levine; George S Rust; Maria Pisu; Vincent Agboto; Peter A Baltrus; Nathaniel C Briggs; Roger Zoorob; Paul Juarez; Pamela C Hull; Irwin Goldzweig; Charles H Hennekens
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Current Directions in Videoconferencing Tele-Mental Health Research.

Authors:  Lisa K Richardson; B Christopher Frueh; Anouk L Grubaugh; Leonard Egede; Jon D Elhai
Journal:  Clin Psychol (New York)       Date:  2009-09-01

Review 9.  Twenty years of telemedicine in chronic disease management--an evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Richard Wootton
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.184

10.  Crossing the telemedicine chasm: have the U.S. barriers to widespread adoption of telemedicine been significantly reduced?

Authors:  Cynthia LeRouge; Monica J Garfield
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.390

View more
  25 in total

1.  Bipolar disorder in primary care: a qualitative study of clinician and patient experiences with diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Joseph M Cerimele; John C Fortney; Jeffrey M Pyne; Geoffrey M Curran
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 2.267

2.  Leveraging Science to Advance Health Equity: A Regional Health Policy Research Center's Approach.

Authors:  Kisha B Holden; Jammie Hopkins; Allyson Belton; Klahe Butty; Derrick C Tabor; David Satcher
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 1.847

3.  Promotion by Education: Adolescent Mental Health Policy Translation in a Local Context of China.

Authors:  Cheng Guo; Christina Keller; Fredrik Söderqvist; Göran Tomson
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2020-01

4.  Functionality of hospital information systems: results from a survey of quality directors at Turkish hospitals.

Authors:  Mehmet Saluvan; Al Ozonoff
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Developing a Mental Health eClinic to Improve Access to and Quality of Mental Health Care for Young People: Using Participatory Design as Research Methodologies.

Authors:  Laura Ospina-Pinillos; Tracey A Davenport; Cristina S Ricci; Alyssa C Milton; Elizabeth M Scott; Ian B Hickie
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Telemedicine and Outpatient Subspecialty Visits Among Pediatric Medicaid Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Kristin N Ray; Ateev Mehrotra; Jonathan G Yabes; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.107

7.  Financing for Collaborative Care - A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Andrew D Carlo; Jürgen Unützer; Anna D H Ratzliff; Joseph M Cerimele
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Psychiatry       Date:  2018-07-06

8.  Mobilization of Telepsychiatry in Response to COVID-19-Moving Toward 21st Century Access to Care.

Authors:  Jacob T Kannarkat; Noah N Smith; Stephen A McLeod-Bryant
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2020-07

9.  Validation of use of billing codes for identifying telemedicine encounters in administrative data.

Authors:  Deepika Yeramosu; Florence Kwok; Jeremy M Kahn; Kristin N Ray
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Acceptability of Telemedicine Features to Promote Its Uptake in Practice: A Survey of Community Telemental Health Providers.

Authors:  Brian E Bunnell; Janelle F Barrera; Samantha R Paige; Dylan Turner; Brandon M Welch
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.