| Literature DB >> 27690214 |
Steffen Zopf1, Lara Rösch1, Peter C Konturek2, Ruediger S Goertz1, Markus F Neurath1, Deike Strobel1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-invasive procedures such as acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) shear-wave elastography are currently used for the assessment of liver fibrosis. In the course of chronic hepatitis C, significant liver fibrosis or cirrhosis develops in approximately 25% of patients, which is a negative predictor of antiviral treatment response. Cirrhosis can be prevented by successful virus elimination. In this prospective study, a pretreatment ARFI cutoff value of 1.5 m/s was evaluated in relation to sustained virological response to anti-HCV therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS In 23 patients with chronic hepatitis C, liver stiffness was examined with ARFI at defined times before and under antiviral triple therapy (peginterferon, ribavirin in combination with a first-generation protease inhibitor, and telaprevir or boceprevir). Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on pretreatment ARFI values (<1.5 m/s and ≥1.5 m/s) for the assessment of virological response. RESULTS The liver stiffness at baseline for all patients was 1.57±0.79 m/s (ARFI median ± standard deviation; margin: 0.81 m/s to 3.45 m/s). At week 4 of triple therapy, patients with low pretreatment ARFI values had higher rates of HCV-RNA negativity (69% vs. 43%), reflecting an early rapid virological response (eRVR). Sustained virological response (SVR) was found in 75% (12/16) of patients with an ARFI value <1.5 m/s and only 57% (4/7) of patients with ARFI value ≥1.5 m/s. CONCLUSIONS Patients with chronic hepatitis C and pretreatment ARFI <1.5 m/s showed earlier virus elimination and better response to treatment.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27690214 PMCID: PMC5051551 DOI: 10.12659/msm.896344
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Patient baseline characteristics.
| All patients (n=23) | <1.5 m/s (n=16) | ≥1.5 m/s (n=7) | significance (p) </≥1.5 m/s | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pretreatment ARFI value [<1.5m/s/≥1.5m/s] | [16/7] | [16/0] | [0/7] | |
| gender [m/f] | [17/6] | [12/4] | [5/2] | n.s. |
| age [years] | 50.39±10.67 | 56.08±10.23 | 47.14±11.74 | n.s. |
| BMI [kg/m2] | 26.7±4.9 | 25.58±2.24 | 30±5.03 | 0.0074 |
| Previous treatment [naive/experienced] | [10/13] | [8/4] | [2/5] | n.s. |
| Il 28b [TT/TC/CC] | [2/12/9] | [2/8/6] | [0/4/3] | n.s. |
| HCV RNA [IE/ml] | 2.989.421±3.821.878 | 2.691.429±3.591.168 | 3.823.800±4.757.707 | n.s. |
| AST [U/l] | 71.91±57.02 | 50.27±19.8 | 118.29±82.36 | 0.0044 |
| ALT [U/l] | 78.05±48.86 | 65.53±33.57 | 104.86±67.05 | n.s. |
| Gamma-GT [U/l] | 99.23±75.96 | 89.27±81.62 | 120.57±62.2 | n.s. |
| Bilirubin [mg/dl] | 0.7±0.33 | 0.69±0.36 | 0.7±0.26 | n.s. |
| Albumin [g/l] | 43.4±3.93 | 45±1.68 | 39.94±5.21 | 0.0018 |
| Thrombocytes [/nl] | 185±60.02 | 192.6±54.01 | 168.71±73.15 | n.s. |
| Leucocytes [/nl] | 7.49±1.998 | 7.8±2.03 | 6.82±1.88 | n.s. |
| Hemoglobin [g/dl] | 14.9±1.92 | 15.27±1.3 | 14.25±2.85 | n.s. |
| International Normalized Ratio (INR) | 1.1±0.1 | 1.3±0.2 | 1.2±0.2 | n.s. |
| Median ARFI-value | 1.57±0.79 | 1.18±0.204 | 2.66±0.86 | 0.0001 |
| Average | 1.61±0.81 | 1.21±0.19 | 2.66±0.9 | 0.0001 |
| IQB | 0.28±0.23 | 0.22±0.13 | 0.46±0.33 | |
| Genotype [1a/1b] | [9/14] | [4/8] | [1/6] | n.s. |
| Overall responder [responder/non-responder] | [16/7] | [12/4] | [4/3] | n.s. |
Significant differences between patients with initial shear-wave velocities ≥1.5 m/s were observed for BMI, GOT, albumin, and initial shear-wave velocities. n.s. – non-significant.
Figure 1Example of ARFI measurement: During real-time B-mode US, a region of interest (10×5 mm) is placed in the liver parenchyma (segment VII). Vs. (shear-wave velocity): 1.07 m/s which represents no significant fibrosis (A); 2.89 m/s which represents significant fibrosis/cirrhosis (B).
Figure 2A low baseline shear-wave velocity <1.5 m/s (n=16) results in a higher percentage of HCV-RNA negativity at week 4 of triple therapy (69% vs. 43%, p=0.363; n.s. (non-significant)) and 24 weeks after end of therapy (75% vs. 57%, p=0.6258; n.s.) compared to high baseline shear-wave velocity (≥1.5 m/s) (n=7). During therapy, no differences in HCV-RNA negativity were observed between groups (A <1.5 vs. B ≥1.5 m/s: week 12: group A 87% vs. group B 83%; week 24: 92% vs. 80%; week 48 100% vs. 100%; all n.s.).