Literature DB >> 27690163

Temporal synchrony is an effective cue for grouping and segmentation in the absence of form cues.

Reuben Rideaux1, David R Badcock2, Alan Johnston3, Mark Edwards4.   

Abstract

The synchronous change of a feature across multiple discrete elements, i.e., temporal synchrony, has been shown to be a powerful cue for grouping and segmentation. This has been demonstrated with both static and dynamic stimuli for a range of tasks. However, in addition to temporal synchrony, stimuli in previous research have included other cues which can also facilitate grouping and segmentation, such as good continuation and coherent spatial configuration. To evaluate the effectiveness of temporal synchrony for grouping and segmentation in isolation, here we measure signal detection thresholds using a global-Gabor stimulus in the presence/absence of a synchronous event. We also examine the impact of the spatial proximity of the to-be-grouped elements on the effectiveness of temporal synchrony, and the duration for which elements are bound together following a synchronous event in the absence of further segmentation cues. The results show that temporal synchrony (in isolation) is an effective cue for grouping local elements together to extract a global signal. Further, we find that the effectiveness of temporal synchrony as a cue for segmentation is modulated by the spatial proximity of signal elements. Finally, we demonstrate that following a synchronous event, elements are perceptually bound together for an average duration of 200 ms.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27690163     DOI: 10.1167/16.11.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  3 in total

1.  Reduced Monocular Luminance Increases Monocular Temporal Synchrony Threshold in Human Adults.

Authors:  Ling Gong; Seung Hyun Min; Shijia Chen; Junhan Wei; Deying Kong; Chunwen Tao; Peng Zhang; Pi-Chun Huang; Jiawei Zhou
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  A Neurodynamic Model of Feature-Based Spatial Selection.

Authors:  Mateja Marić; Dražen Domijan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-28

3.  Short-Term Deprivation Does Not Influence Monocular or Dichoptic Temporal Synchrony at Low Temporal Frequency.

Authors:  Yiya Chen; Seung Hyun Min; Ziyun Cheng; Shijia Chen; Zili Wang; Chunwen Tao; Fan Lu; Jia Qu; Pi-Chun Huang; Robert F Hess; Jiawei Zhou
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.677

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.