Catherine L Granger1,2,3, Linda Denehy1,3, Louisa Remedios1, Sarah Retica1, Pimsiri Phongpagdi1, Nicholas Hart4,5,6, Selina M Parry1. 1. 1 Department of Physiotherapy, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 2. 2 Department of Physiotherapy, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 3. 3 Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia. 4. 4 Guy's and St. Thomas' National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust and King's College London, National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom. 5. 5 Lane Fox Clinical Respiratory Physiology Research Centre, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; and. 6. 6 Division of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines recommend physical activity for people with lung cancer, however evidence has not translated into clinical practice and the majority of patients do not meet recommended activity levels. OBJECTIVES: To identify factors (barriers and enablers) that influence clinicians' translation of the physical activity guidelines into practice. METHODS: Qualitative study involving 17 participants (three respiratory physicians, two thoracic surgeons, two oncologists, two nurses, and eight physical therapists) who were recruited using purposive sampling from five hospitals in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Nine semistructured interviews and a focus group were conducted, transcribed verbatim, and independently cross-checked by a second researcher. Thematic analysis was used to analyze data. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Five consistent themes emerged: (1) the clinicians perception of patient-related physical and psychological influences (including symptoms and comorbidities) that impact on patient's ability to perform regular physical activity; (2) the influence of the patient's past physical activity behavior and their perceived relevance and knowledge about physical activity; (3) the clinicians own knowledge and beliefs about physical activity; (4) workplace culture supporting or hindering physical activity; and (5) environmental and structural influences in the healthcare system (included clinicians time, staffing, protocols and services). Clinicians described potential strategies, including: (1) the opportunity for nurse practitioners to act as champions of regular physical activity and triage referrals for physical activity services; (2) opportunistically using the time when patients are in hospital after surgery to discuss physical activity; and (3) for all members of the multidisciplinary team to provide consistent messages to patients about the importance of physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Key barriers to implementation of the physical activity guidelines in lung cancer are diverse and include both clinician- and healthcare system-related factors. A combined approach to target a number of these factors should be used to inform research, improve clinical services, and develop policies aiming to increase physical activity and improve survivorship outcomes for patients with lung cancer.
RATIONALE: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines recommend physical activity for people with lung cancer, however evidence has not translated into clinical practice and the majority of patients do not meet recommended activity levels. OBJECTIVES: To identify factors (barriers and enablers) that influence clinicians' translation of the physical activity guidelines into practice. METHODS: Qualitative study involving 17 participants (three respiratory physicians, two thoracic surgeons, two oncologists, two nurses, and eight physical therapists) who were recruited using purposive sampling from five hospitals in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Nine semistructured interviews and a focus group were conducted, transcribed verbatim, and independently cross-checked by a second researcher. Thematic analysis was used to analyze data. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Five consistent themes emerged: (1) the clinicians perception of patient-related physical and psychological influences (including symptoms and comorbidities) that impact on patient's ability to perform regular physical activity; (2) the influence of the patient's past physical activity behavior and their perceived relevance and knowledge about physical activity; (3) the clinicians own knowledge and beliefs about physical activity; (4) workplace culture supporting or hindering physical activity; and (5) environmental and structural influences in the healthcare system (included clinicians time, staffing, protocols and services). Clinicians described potential strategies, including: (1) the opportunity for nurse practitioners to act as champions of regular physical activity and triage referrals for physical activity services; (2) opportunistically using the time when patients are in hospital after surgery to discuss physical activity; and (3) for all members of the multidisciplinary team to provide consistent messages to patients about the importance of physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Key barriers to implementation of the physical activity guidelines in lung cancer are diverse and include both clinician- and healthcare system-related factors. A combined approach to target a number of these factors should be used to inform research, improve clinical services, and develop policies aiming to increase physical activity and improve survivorship outcomes for patients with lung cancer.
Entities:
Keywords:
exercise; knowledge translation; motor activity
Authors: Weijiao Zhou; Katelyn E Webster; Ellen Lavoie Smith; Weiyun Chen; Philip T Veliz; Rishindra M Reddy; Janet L Larson Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-04-06 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Amy M Dennett; Bernadette Zappa; Rachel Wong; Stephen B Ting; Kimberley Williams; Casey L Peiris Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-05-08 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: J Frikkel; M Beckmann; N De Lazzari; M Götte; S Kasper; J Hense; M Schuler; M Teufel; M Tewes Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-02-19 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Catherine L Granger; Lara Edbrooke; Phillip Antippa; Gavin Wright; Christine F McDonald; Karen E Lamb; Louis Irving; Meinir Krishnasamy; Shaza Abo; Georgina A Whish-Wilson; Dominic Truong; Linda Denehy; Selina M Parry Journal: BMJ Open Respir Res Date: 2022-01
Authors: Joanne Bayly; Bethany M Edwards; Nicola Peat; Geoffrey Warwick; Ivo M Hennig; Arvind Arora; Andrew Wilcock; Irene J Higginson; Matthew Maddocks Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2018-10-18
Authors: J Frikkel; M Götte; M Beckmann; S Kasper; J Hense; M Teufel; M Schuler; M Tewes Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2020-03-31 Impact factor: 3.234