Literature DB >> 27689931

Restoration Survival: Revisiting Patients' Risk Factors Through a Systematic Literature Review.

F H van de Sande, K Collares, M B Correa, M S Cenci, F F Demarco, Njm Opdam.   

Abstract

A literature review was conducted to investigate the influence of patient-related factors on restoration survival in posterior permanent teeth as well as to report the methods used to collect these factors. The selection of articles on longitudinal clinical studies investigating the survival of posterior restorations (except full crowns and temporary fillings) and including patient-related factors was performed by applying predefined criteria. The review was organized into two parts, the first describing how patient factors were assessed in the studies (n=45) and the second presenting the statistical significance (n=27) and size of the effect (n=11) of these factors on restoration survival. Patient-related factors mentioned in the studies included age; gender; caries risk; caries activity/severity; decayed, missing, filled teeth; number of restorations; oral hygiene; and bruxism, among others. Sixteen studies included the patient age or age range in the analysis, which was found to be significant in 47% of the studies. Regarding gender, four of 17 reports found a significant effect on survival, showing more failures for men in three studies. The caries risk profile or related variables were included in the analysis of 15 studies, and a significant effect on survival was reported for high-caries-risk individuals (or related variables) in 67% of these studies. Bruxism was also found to influence restoration survival in three of six studies where this variable was investigated. Some issues were found regarding the reporting of methods used to classify patients according to risk and were thoroughly discussed. In view of the information gathered in this review, the assessment of patient factors along with other variables should become part of clinical studies investigating restoration survival, since several of these factors were shown to influence the failure of restorations, regardless of the material type.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27689931     DOI: 10.2341/15-120-LIT

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  11 in total

1.  Deterioration of anterior resin composite restorations in moderate to severe tooth wear patients: 3-year results.

Authors:  Verônica P Lima; Luuk A M J Crins; Niek J M Opdam; Rafael R Moraes; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Marie-Charlotte D N J M Huysmans; Bas A C Loomans
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 3.606

2.  Longevity of posterior composite restorations in children suffering from early childhood caries-results from a retrospective study.

Authors:  Merve Bayram; Beyza Ballı Akgöl; Nilüfer Üstün
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Effect of Cavity Disinfectants on Adhesion to Primary Teeth-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ana Coelho; Inês Amaro; Ana Apolónio; Anabela Paula; José Saraiva; Manuel Marques Ferreira; Carlos Miguel Marto; Eunice Carrilho
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays.

Authors:  Joana Souza; Mª Victoria Fuentes; Eugenia Baena; Laura Ceballos
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.634

5.  Comparison of two clinical approaches based on visual criteria for secondary caries assessments and treatment decisions in permanent posterior teeth.

Authors:  Cacia Signori; Juliana Lays Stolfo Uehara; Vitor Henrique Digmayer Romero; Bruna Lorena Pereira Moro; Mariana Minatel Braga; Fausto Medeiros Mendes; Maximiliano Sérgio Cenci
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  Prospective clinical evaluation of chairside-fabricated zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic partial crowns-5-year results.

Authors:  Sven Rinke; Tanja Zuck; Tim Hausdörfer; Andreas Leha; Torsten Wassmann; Dirk Ziebolz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 7.  Managements of sleep bruxism in adult: A systematic review.

Authors:  Hajime Minakuchi; Masanori Fujisawa; Yuka Abe; Takashi Iida; Kyosuke Oki; Kazuo Okura; Norimasa Tanabe; Akira Nishiyama
Journal:  Jpn Dent Sci Rev       Date:  2022-03-25

8.  Needs for re-intervention on restored teeth in adults: a practice-based study.

Authors:  Franck Decup; Emmanuelle Dantony; Charlène Chevalier; Alexandra David; Valentin Garyga; Marie Tohmé; François Gueyffier; Patrice Nony; Delphine Maucort-Boulch; Brigitte Grosgogeat
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Reconfigurable Dual Peptide Tethered Polymer System Offers a Synergistic Solution for Next Generation Dental Adhesives.

Authors:  Esra Yuca; Sheng-Xue Xie; Linyong Song; Kyle Boone; Nilan Kamathewatta; Sarah K Woolfolk; Philip Elrod; Paulette Spencer; Candan Tamerler
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Survival of direct composite restorations placed under general anesthesia in adult patients with intellectual and/or physical disabilities.

Authors:  Mona Shaghayegh Maes; Philipp Kanzow; Valentina Hrasky; Annette Wiegand
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.