| Literature DB >> 27689459 |
Maryam Rahman1, Joseph Abbatematteo1, Edward K De Leo1, Paul S Kubilis1, Sasha Vaziri1, Frank Bova1, Elias Sayour1, Duane Mitchell1, Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE An increased extent of resection (EOR) has been shown to improve overall survival of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) but has the potential for causing a new postoperative neurological deficit. To investigate the impact of surgical neurological morbidity on survival, the authors performed a retrospective analysis of the clinical data from patients with GBM to quantify the impact of a new neurological deficit on the survival benefit achieved with an increased EOR. METHODS The data from all GBM patients who underwent resection at the University of Florida from 2010 to 2015 with postoperative imaging within 72 hours of surgery were included in the study. Retrospective analysis was performed on clinical outcomes and tumor volumes determined on postoperative and follow-up imaging examinations. RESULTS Overall, 115 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. Tumor volume at the time of presentation was a median of 59 cm3 (enhanced on T1-weighted MRI scans). The mean EOR (± SD) was 94.2% ± 8.7% (range 59.9%-100%). Almost 30% of patients had a new postoperative neurological deficit, including motor weakness, sensory deficits, language difficulty, visual deficits, confusion, and ataxia. The neurological deficits had resolved in 41% of these patients on subsequent follow-up examinations. The median overall survival was 13.1 months (95% CI 10.9-15.2 months). Using a multipredictor Cox model, the authors observed that increased EOR was associated with improved survival except for patients with smaller tumor volumes (≤ 15 cm3). A residual volume of 2.5 cm3 or less predicted a favorable overall survival. Developing a postoperative neurological deficit significantly affected survival (9.2 months compared with 14.7 months, p = 0.02), even if the neurological deficit had resolved by the first follow-up. However, there was a trend of improved survival among patients with resolution of a neurological deficit by the first follow-up compared with patients with a permanent neurological deficit. Any survival benefit from achieving a 95% EOR was abrogated by the development of a new neurological deficit postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS Developing a new neurological deficit after resection of GBM is associated with a decrease in overall survival. A careful balance between EOR and neurological compromise needs to be taken into account to reduce the likelihood of neurological morbidity from surgery.Entities:
Keywords: EOR = extent of resection; GBM = glioblastoma; HR = hazard ratio; HRQOL = health-related quality of life; KPS = Karnofsky Performance Scale; RV = residual volume; extent of resection; glioblastoma; iMRI = intraoperative MRI; neurological deficit; oncology; postoperative morbidity; quality of life; resection
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27689459 DOI: 10.3171/2016.7.JNS16396
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurosurg ISSN: 0022-3085 Impact factor: 5.115