CONTEXT: Mutations in the BRAF and RAS oncogenes are responsible for most well-differentiated thyroid cancer. Yet, our clinical understanding of how BRAF-positive and RAS-positive thyroid cancers differ is incomplete. OBJECTIVE: We correlated clinical, radiographic, and pathological findings from patients with thyroid cancer harboring a BRAF or RAS mutation. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic, tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 101 consecutive patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: We compared the clinical, sonographic, and pathological characteristics of patients with BRAF-positive cancer to those with RAS-positive cancer. RESULTS: Of 101 patients harboring these mutations, 71 were BRAF-positive, whereas 30 were RAS-positive. Upon sonographic evaluation, RAS-positive nodules were significantly larger (P = .04), although BRAF-positive nodules were more likely to harbor concerning sonographic characteristics (hypoechogenicity [P < .001]; irregular margins [P = .04]). Cytologically, 70% of BRAF-positive nodules were classified positive for PTC, whereas 87% of RAS-positive nodules were indeterminate (P < .001). Histologically, 96% of RAS-positive PTC malignancies were follicular variants of PTC, whereas 70% of BRAF-positive malignancies were classical variants of PTC. BRAF-positive malignancies were more likely to demonstrate extrathyroidal extension (P = .003), lymphovascular invasion (P = .02), and lymph node metastasis (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: BRAF-positive malignant nodules most often demonstrate worrisome sonographic features and are frequently associated with positive or suspicious Bethesda cytology. In contrast, RAS-positive malignancy most often demonstrates indolent sonographic features and more commonly associates with lower risk, "indeterminate" cytology. Because BRAF and RAS mutations are the most common molecular perturbations associated with well-differentiated thyroid cancer, these findings may assist with improved preoperative risk assessment by suggesting the likely molecular profile of a thyroid cancer, even when postsurgical molecular analysis is unavailable.
CONTEXT: Mutations in the BRAF and RAS oncogenes are responsible for most well-differentiated thyroid cancer. Yet, our clinical understanding of how BRAF-positive and RAS-positive thyroid cancers differ is incomplete. OBJECTIVE: We correlated clinical, radiographic, and pathological findings from patients with thyroid cancer harboring a BRAF or RAS mutation. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic, tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 101 consecutive patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: We compared the clinical, sonographic, and pathological characteristics of patients with BRAF-positive cancer to those with RAS-positive cancer. RESULTS: Of 101 patients harboring these mutations, 71 were BRAF-positive, whereas 30 were RAS-positive. Upon sonographic evaluation, RAS-positive nodules were significantly larger (P = .04), although BRAF-positive nodules were more likely to harbor concerning sonographic characteristics (hypoechogenicity [P < .001]; irregular margins [P = .04]). Cytologically, 70% of BRAF-positive nodules were classified positive for PTC, whereas 87% of RAS-positive nodules were indeterminate (P < .001). Histologically, 96% of RAS-positive PTC malignancies were follicular variants of PTC, whereas 70% of BRAF-positive malignancies were classical variants of PTC. BRAF-positive malignancies were more likely to demonstrate extrathyroidal extension (P = .003), lymphovascular invasion (P = .02), and lymph node metastasis (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS:BRAF-positive malignant nodules most often demonstrate worrisome sonographic features and are frequently associated with positive or suspicious Bethesda cytology. In contrast, RAS-positive malignancy most often demonstrates indolent sonographic features and more commonly associates with lower risk, "indeterminate" cytology. Because BRAF and RAS mutations are the most common molecular perturbations associated with well-differentiated thyroid cancer, these findings may assist with improved preoperative risk assessment by suggesting the likely molecular profile of a thyroid cancer, even when postsurgical molecular analysis is unavailable.
Authors: Laura E MacConaill; Elizabeth Garcia; Priyanka Shivdasani; Matthew Ducar; Ravali Adusumilli; Marc Breneiser; Mark Byrne; Lawrence Chung; Jodie Conneely; Lauren Crosby; Levi A Garraway; Xin Gong; William C Hahn; Charlie Hatton; Philip W Kantoff; Michael Kluk; Frank Kuo; Yonghui Jia; Ruchi Joshi; Janina Longtine; Allison Manning; Emanuele Palescandolo; Nematullah Sharaf; Lynette Sholl; Paul van Hummelen; Jacqueline Wade; Bruce M Wollinson; Dimity Zepf; Barrett J Rollins; Neal I Lindeman Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2014-08-23 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: David S Cooper; Gerard M Doherty; Bryan R Haugen; Richard T Kloos; Stephanie L Lee; Susan J Mandel; Ernest L Mazzaferri; Bryan McIver; Steven I Sherman; R Michael Tuttle Journal: Thyroid Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: David S Cooper; Gerard M Doherty; Bryan R Haugen; Bryan R Hauger; Richard T Kloos; Stephanie L Lee; Susan J Mandel; Ernest L Mazzaferri; Bryan McIver; Furio Pacini; Martin Schlumberger; Steven I Sherman; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle Journal: Thyroid Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Mingzhao Xing; Ali S Alzahrani; Kathryn A Carson; Young Kee Shong; Tae Yong Kim; David Viola; Rossella Elisei; Bela Bendlová; Linwah Yip; Caterina Mian; Federica Vianello; R Michael Tuttle; Eyal Robenshtok; James A Fagin; Efisio Puxeddu; Laura Fugazzola; Agnieszka Czarniecka; Barbara Jarzab; Christine J O'Neill; Mark S Sywak; Alfred K Lam; Garcilaso Riesco-Eizaguirre; Pilar Santisteban; Hirotaka Nakayama; Roderick Clifton-Bligh; Giovanni Tallini; Elizabeth H Holt; Vlasta Sýkorová Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-10-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alan L Ho; Ravinder K Grewal; Rebecca Leboeuf; Eric J Sherman; David G Pfister; Desiree Deandreis; Keith S Pentlow; Pat B Zanzonico; Sofia Haque; Somali Gavane; Ronald A Ghossein; Julio C Ricarte-Filho; José M Domínguez; Ronglai Shen; R Michael Tuttle; Steve M Larson; James A Fagin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-02-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Joaquim Bellmunt; Lillian Werner; Jeffrey J Leow; Stephanie A Mullane; André P Fay; Markus Riester; Paul Van Hummelen; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Toni K Choueiri; Eliezer Van Allen; Jonathan Rosenberg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Laura E MacConaill; Catarina D Campbell; Sarah M Kehoe; Adam J Bass; Charles Hatton; Lili Niu; Matt Davis; Keluo Yao; Megan Hanna; Chandrani Mondal; Lauren Luongo; Caroline M Emery; Alissa C Baker; Juliet Philips; Deborah J Goff; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Mark A Rubin; Kornelia Polyak; Jennifer Chan; Yuexiang Wang; Jonathan A Fletcher; Sandro Santagata; Gianni Corso; Franco Roviello; Ramesh Shivdasani; Mark W Kieran; Keith L Ligon; Charles D Stiles; William C Hahn; Matthew L Meyerson; Levi A Garraway Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-11-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Yong-Man Kim; Shin-Wha Lee; Sung-Min Chun; Dae-Yeon Kim; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Kyu-Rae Kim; Young-Tak Kim; Joo-Hyun Nam; Paul van Hummelen; Laura E MacConaill; William C Hahn; Se Jin Jang Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-06-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Julio C Ricarte-Filho; Stephen Halada; Alison O'Neill; Victoria Casado-Medrano; Theodore W Laetsch; Aime T Franco; Andrew J Bauer Journal: Cancer Genet Date: 2022-01-19
Authors: Aime T Franco; Julio C Ricarte-Filho; Amber Isaza; Zachary Jones; Neil Jain; Sogol Mostoufi-Moab; Lea Surrey; Theodore W Laetsch; Marilyn M Li; Jessica Clague DeHart; Erin Reichenberger; Deanne Taylor; Ken Kazahaya; N Scott Adzick; Andrew J Bauer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 50.717
Authors: Mourad Zerfaoui; Titilope Modupe Dokunmu; Eman Ali Toraih; Bashir M Rezk; Zakaria Y Abd Elmageed; Emad Kandil Journal: Cells Date: 2021-02-10 Impact factor: 6.600
Authors: Koorosh Semsar-Kazerooni; Grégoire B Morand; Alexandra E Payne; Sabrina D da Silva; Véronique-Isabelle Forest; Michael P Hier; Marc P Pusztaszeri; Michael Tamilia; Richard J Payne Journal: J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2022-03-04