Literature DB >> 27689236

Microfiber Masses Recovered from Conventional Machine Washing of New or Aged Garments.

Niko L Hartline1, Nicholas J Bruce1, Stephanie N Karba1, Elizabeth O Ruff1, Shreya U Sonar1, Patricia A Holden1.   

Abstract

Synthetic textiles can shed numerous microfibers during conventional washing, but evaluating environmental consequences as well as source-control strategies requires understanding mass releases. Polyester apparel accounts for a large proportion of the polyester market, and synthetic jackets represent the broadest range in apparel construction, allowing for potential changes in manufacturing as a mitigation measure to reduce microfiber release during laundering. Here, detergent-free washing experiments were conducted and replicated in both front- and top-load conventional home machines for five new and mechanically aged jackets or sweaters: four from one name-brand clothing manufacturer (three majority polyester fleece, and one nylon shell with nonwoven polyester insulation) and one off-brand (100% polyester fleece). Wash water was filtered to recover two size fractions (>333 μm and between 20 and 333 μm); filters were then imaged, and microfiber masses were calculated. Across all treatments, the recovered microfiber mass per garment ranged from approximately 0 to 2 g, or exceeding 0.3% of the unwashed garment mass. Microfiber masses from top-load machines were approximately 7 times those from front-load machines; garments mechanically aged via a 24 h continuous wash had increased mass release under the same wash protocol as new garments. When published wastewater treatment plant influent characterization and microfiber removal studies are considered, washing synthetic jackets or sweaters as per this study would account for most microfibers entering the environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27689236     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b03045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  21 in total

1.  Microfibers: a preliminary discussion on their definition and sources.

Authors:  Jianli Liu; Yunfei Yang; Jiannan Ding; Bo Zhu; Weidong Gao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Release of polyester and cotton fibers from textiles in machine washings.

Authors:  Markus Sillanpää; Pirjo Sainio
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  A planet too rich in fibre: Microfibre pollution may have major consequences on the environment and human health.

Authors:  Melissa Suran
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Sources, transport, measurement and impact of nano and microplastics in urban watersheds.

Authors:  Quinn T Birch; Phillip M Potter; Patricio X Pinto; Dionysios D Dionysiou; Souhail R Al-Abed
Journal:  Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 8.044

5.  Microplastic Incorporation into Soil in Agroecosystems.

Authors:  Matthias C Rillig; Rosolino Ingraffia; Anderson A de Souza Machado
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Wastewater treatment plants as a source of microplastics to an urban estuary: Removal efficiencies and loading per capita over one year.

Authors:  Kenda Conley; Allan Clum; Jestine Deepe; Haven Lane; Barbara Beckingham
Journal:  Water Res X       Date:  2019-04-10

Review 7.  Squid-Inspired Tandem Repeat Proteins: Functional Fibers and Films.

Authors:  Abdon Pena-Francesch; Melik C Demirel
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 5.221

Review 8.  Plastic microfibre pollution: how important is clothes' laundering?

Authors:  Christine Gaylarde; Jose Antonio Baptista-Neto; Estefan Monteiro da Fonseca
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-05-25

9.  Investigating the presence of microplastics in demersal sharks of the North-East Atlantic.

Authors:  Kristian J Parton; Brendan J Godley; David Santillo; Muhammad Tausif; Lucy C M Omeyer; Tamara S Galloway
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Synthetic microfiber emissions to land rival those to waterbodies and are growing.

Authors:  Jenna Gavigan; Timnit Kefela; Ilan Macadam-Somer; Sangwon Suh; Roland Geyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.