| Literature DB >> 27689132 |
Matthew W Brunke1, Christopher W Frye2, Corri B Levine2, Cristina Hansen3, Joseph J Wakshlag2.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of running a 1000-mile (1600 km) endurance sled dog race on serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and insulin-like growth factor binding proteins 1 and 3 (IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-3). Serum was examined from 12 sled dogs prior to the race, at midrace (approximately 690 km), and again at the finish. IGF-1, IGFBP-1, and IGFBP-3 were assessed using radioimmunoassay or enzyme linked immune-absorbance assays. Mean prerace concentrations were significantly higher than midrace and end-race concentrations at 215.93 ± 80.51 ng/mL, 54.29 ± 25.45 ng/mL, and 55.53 ± 28.25 ng/mL, respectively (P < 0.001). Mean IGFBP-1 concentrations were not different across these time periods at 24.1 ± 15.8 ng/mL, 25.7 ± 14.0 ng/mL, and 26.6 ± 17.6 ng/mL, respectively. IGFBP-3 concentrations showed a modest significant decrease across time periods at 3,067 ± 2,792 ng/mL, 2,626 ± 2,310 ng/mL, and 2,331 ± 2,301 ng/mL, respectively (P < 0.01). Endurance sled dogs show a precipitous drop in serum IGF-1 concentrations. These differences may be related to fuel utilization and excessive negative energy balance associated with the loss of body condition during racing. The relative stability of IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-3 suggests that IGF-1 anabolic signaling is diminished during ultramarathon racing. Further studies comparing the influence of time and duration of exercise versus negative energy balance on serum IGF-1 status are warranted to better understand exercise versus negative energy balance differences.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27689132 PMCID: PMC5027292 DOI: 10.1155/2016/5686372
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Dog identification, age, gender, and starting and ending body conditions for all dogs examined (n-12).
| Dog | Age | Gender | Start | Finish |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sound | 4 | F | 5 | 3 |
| Cat | 2 | F | 5 | 3 |
| Bato | 2 | M | 4 | 3 |
| Basin | 4 | M | 4 | 3.5 |
| Heath | 5 | M | 4 | 3 |
| Yukon | 5 | M | 5 | 3.5 |
| Carbon | 5 | M | 4 | 3 |
| Braeburn | 5 | M | 5 | 3.5 |
| Chica | 2 | F | 5 | 3 |
| Krypton | 3 | M | 4 | 3 |
| Copper | 5 | M | 5 | 3 |
| Merc | 5 | M | 5 | 3 |
Figure 1IGF-1 mean and standard deviation at prerace, midrace, and race finish. Boxes represent mean and 75th and 25th percentiles and whiskers represent 1st and 99th percentiles. ∗ indicates a significant difference from the prerace values (P < 0.01).
Figure 2IGFBP-1 at prerace, midrace, and race finish. Boxes represent mean and 75th and 25th percentiles and whiskers represent 1st and 99th percentiles.
Figure 3IGFBP-3 at prerace, midrace, and race finish. Boxes represent median and 75th and 25th percentiles and whiskers represent 1st and 99th percentiles. ∗ indicates a significant difference from the prerace values (P < 0.01).