| Literature DB >> 27688879 |
Sandra J A van Kuijk1, José C Del Río2, Jorge Rencoret2, Ana Gutiérrez2, Anton S M Sonnenberg3, Johan J P Baars3, Wouter H Hendriks1, John W Cone1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The present work investigated the influence of lignin content and composition in the fungal treatment of lignocellulosic biomass in order to improve rumen degradability. Wheat straw and wood chips, differing in lignin composition, were treated with Lentinula edodes for 0, 2, 4, 8 and 12 wk and the changes occurring during fungal degradation were analyzed using pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and detergent fiber analysis.Entities:
Keywords: Fungal treatment; In vitro rumen degradability; Lignocellulosic biomass; Py-GC/MS
Year: 2016 PMID: 27688879 PMCID: PMC5034620 DOI: 10.1186/s40104-016-0110-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Sci Biotechnol ISSN: 1674-9782
Chemical composition of autoclaved wheat straw and wood chips before and after treatment with L. edodes for 2, 4, 8 and 12 wk
| Substrate | Treatment time, wk | Contents, g/kg DM | Amounts, g | DM loss, % | IVGP, mL/g OM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADL | HC | Cell | ADL | HC | Cell | ||||
| Wheat straw | 0 | 81.1a | 260.1a | 479.6b,c | 7.5a | 24.2a | 44.6 | 0c | 252.8a,b |
| 2 | 74.6b | 202.7b | 461.2c | 6.4b | 17.4b | 39.5 | 8c | 247.8b | |
| 4 | 57.0c | 148.1c | 496.3b | 4.7c | 12.2c | 41.0 | 11b,c | 277.0a,b | |
| 8 | 33.2d | 94.6d | 537.3a | 2.4d | 6.9d | 39.1 | 22b | 287.3a,b | |
| 12 | 15.5e | 87.2d | 544.2a | 1.0e | 5.7d | 35.6 | 30a | 311.2a | |
| RMSE | 2.22 | 11.48 | 11.80 | 0.29 | 1.22 | 3.21 | 0.05 | 22.40 | |
|
| <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.07 | <0.01 | 0.03 | |
| Wood chips | 0 | 198.21 | 140.8a | 445.5c | 15.4a | 11.0a | 35.3 | 0 | 54.0c |
| 2 | 187.3a,b | 96.3a,b | 486.2b | 15.1a | 7.8a,b | 39.2 | 0 | 55.4c | |
| 4 | 163.8b | 103.6a,b | 497.4a,b | 10.1b | 6.8a,b | 31.1 | 20 | 120.7b | |
| 8 | 126.6c | 79.9b | 520.6a | 8.8b | 5.6b | 36.1 | 11 | 169.6a | |
| 12 | 107.0c | 105.6a,b | 436.5c | 6.9b | 6.8a,b | 28.5 | 17 | 177.4a | |
| RMSE | 9.49 | 16.97 | 11.59 | 1.44 | 1.81 | 4.53 | 1.2 | 16.12 | |
|
| <0.01 | 0.02 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.16 | <0.01 | |
Values with different superscripts within column are significantly (P < 0.05) different
ADL acid detergent lignin, HC hemicellulose, Cell cellulose, DM loss dry matter loss, IVGP in vitro gas production, RMSE root-mean-square error
Fig. 1Py-GC/MS chromatograms of wheat straw degraded with the fungus Lentinula edodes. a untreated wheat straw control (0-wk incubation); b wheat straw degraded for 2 wk; c 4 wk; d 8 wk; e 12 wk. The identities and relative abundances of the compounds represented by the numbered peaks are listed in Table 2
Fig. 2Py-GC/MS chromatograms of wood chips degraded with the fungus Lentinula edodes. a untreated wood chips (0-wk incubation); b wood chips degraded for 2 wk; c 4 wk; d 8 wk; e 12 wk. The identities and relative abundances of the compounds represented by the numbered peaks are listed in Table 3
Identities and relative abundance (mean average of three replicates) of the compounds released upon pyrolysis GC/MS of autoclaved wheat straw before and after treatment with L. edodes for 2, 4, 8 and 12 wk
| Label | Compound | Origina | Time, wk | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 12 | |||
| 1 | ( | C | 3.4 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 4.9 | 5.2 |
| 2 | Propanal | C | 6.1 | 5.4 | 4.4 | 4.7 | 6.7 |
| 3 | Furfural | C | 6.0 | 10.1 | 10.4 | 11.2 | 9.7 |
| 4 | 2,3-dihydro-5-methylfuran-2-one | C | 6.0 | 5.4 | 5.1 | 5.4 | 7.0 |
| 5 | ( | C | 4.6 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 4.9 |
| 6 | 4-hydroxy-5,6-dihydro-( | C | 7.9 | 10.9 | 10.8 | 9.1 | 6.5 |
| 7 | 2-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one | C | 3.4 | 3.0 | 3.8 | 5.4 | 5.9 |
| 8 | Phenol | LH | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.0 |
| 9 | Guaiacol | LG | 3.4 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| 10 | 3-hydroxy-2-methyl-( | C | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 2.5 | 2.7 |
| 11 | 4-hydroxymethyl-1,4-butyrolactone | C | 2.9 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 3.9 |
| 12 | 4-methylguaiacol | LG | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| 13 | 4-ethylguaiacol | LG | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 14 | 5-hydroxymethyl-2-tetrahydrofuraldehyde-3-one | C | 1.7 | 1.5 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 3.0 |
| 15 | 1,4-anhydroarabinofuranose | C | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| 16 | 4-vinylphenol | LH/PCA | 9.3 | 6.3 | 3.1 | 2.2 | 0.8 |
| 17 | 4-vinylguaiacol | LG/FA | 8.3 | 5.3 | 2.9 | 2.1 | 0.8 |
| 18 | Eugenol | LG | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| 19 | 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furfuraldehyde | C | 1.7 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 4.7 |
| 20 | Syringol | LS | 2.9 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 0.5 |
| 21 |
| LG | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| 22 | 1,4-dideoxy- | C | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 1.7 |
| 23 |
| LG | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| 24 | 1,4-anhydroxylofuranose | C | 2.4 | 2.1 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 2.4 |
| 25 | 4-methylsyringol | LS | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| 26 | Vanillin | LG | 1.8 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.3 |
| 27 | 4-ethylsyringol | LS | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 28 | vanillic acid methyl ester | LG | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 29 | Acetovanillone | LG | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| 30 | 4-vinylsyringol | LS | 2.2 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| 31 | Guaiacylacetone | LS | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 32 | 4-allyl-syringol | LS | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| 33 | Propiovanillone | LG | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| 34 |
| LS | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| 35 |
| LS | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| 36 | Levoglucosane | C | 10.0 | 15.6 | 21.6 | 25.1 | 27.3 |
| 37 | syringaldehyde | LS | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| 38 | syringic acid methyl ester | LS | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 39 | acetosyringone | LS | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| 40 | syringylacetone | LS | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| 41 | propiosyringone | LS | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| % Lignin | 40.4 | 27.9 | 18.1 | 12.6 | 7.1 | ||
| % Carbohydrates | 59.6 | 72.1 | 81.9 | 87.4 | 92.9 | ||
| Lignin/Carbohydrate ratio | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||
| H | 10 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 2 | ||
| G | 18 | 12 | 9 | 7 | 4 | ||
| S | 12 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 1 | ||
| Syringyl/Guaiacyl ratio | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.4 | ||
| (Syringyl/Guaiacyl)except vinyl ratiob | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 | ||
| Ph-C0-2/Ph-C3c | 5.7 | 6.0 | 8.2 | 9.5 | 10.9 | ||
| % Cα-oxidized lignin | 10.2 | 11.5 | 15.2 | 15.2 | 16.4 | ||
| % Cα-oxidized G-units | 5.9 | 6.5 | 9.4 | 10.4 | 11.3 | ||
| % Cα-oxidized S-units | 4.4 | 4.9 | 5.9 | 4.8 | 5.1 | ||
aC, carbohydrate-derived compounds; LH, p-hydroxycinnamyl lignin-derived compounds; LG, guaiacyl-lignin derived compounds; S, syringyl-lignin derived compounds; PCA, p-coumarates; FA: ferulates. bAll G- and S-derived peaks were used for the estimation of the S/G ratio, except 4-vinylguaiacol (which also arises from ferulates), and the analogous 4-vinylsyringol. cRatio of lignin-derived phenols with none, 1 and 2 carbons in the side-chain to lignin-derived phenols with 3 carbons in the side-chain
Identities and relative abundance (mean average of three replicates) of the compounds released upon pyrolysis GC/MS of autoclaved wood chips before and after treatment with L. edodes for 2, 4, 8 and 12 wk
| Label | Compound | Origina | Time, wk | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 12 | |||
| 1 | ( | C | 2.7 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 3.9 | 4.0 |
| 2 | Propanal | C | 2.5 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.2 |
| 3 | Furfural | C | 6.1 | 8.3 | 8.6 | 8.8 | 9.2 |
| 4 | 2,3-dihydro-5-methylfuran-2-one | C | 4.0 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 4.1 | 3.8 |
| 5 | ( | C | 2.6 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 2.4 |
| 6 | 4-hydroxy-5,6-dihydro-( | C | 5.5 | 7.8 | 7.3 | 7.1 | 7.4 |
| 7 | 2-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one | C | 4.3 | 3.3 | 3.7 | 4.3 | 3.9 |
| 8 | Phenol | LH | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| 9 | Guaiacol | LG | 4.2 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.9 |
| 10 | 3-hydroxy-2-methyl-( | C | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 11 | 4-hydroxymethyl-1,4-butyrolactone | C | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| 12 | 4-methylguaiacol | LG | 4.9 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 |
| 13 | 4-ethylguaiacol | LG | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| 14 | 5-hydroxymethyl-2-tetrahydrofuraldehyde-3-one | C | 1.7 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 2.9 |
| 15 | 1,4-anhydroarabinofuranose | C | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
| 16 | 4-vinylphenol | LH | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.6 |
| 17 | 4-vinylguaiacol | LG | 5.8 | 4.9 | 4.4 | 3.2 | 2.5 |
| 18 | Eugenol | LG | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.5 |
| 19 | 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furfuraldehyde | C | 1.6 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.7 | 3.0 |
| 20 | Syringol | LS | 3.8 | 3.3 | 2.8 | 2.4 | 1.9 |
| 21 |
| LG | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| 22 | 1,4-dideoxy- | C | 0.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| 23 |
| LG | 4.4 | 2.7 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| 24 | 1,4-anhydroxylofuranose | C | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| 25 | 4-methylsyringol | LS | 3.2 | 2.6 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 26 | Vanillin | LG | 1.9 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| 27 | 4-ethylsyringol | LS | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| 28 | vanillic acid methyl ester | LG | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| 29 | acetovanillone | LG | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| 30 | 4-vinylsyringol | LS | 4.4 | 3.5 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 1.3 |
| 31 | guaiacylacetone | LS | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| 32 | 4-allyl-syringol | LS | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| 33 | propiovanillone | LG | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| 34 |
| LS | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.6 |
| 35 |
| LS | 5.2 | 3.6 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| 36 | Levoglucosane | C | 12.6 | 17.0 | 22.2 | 26.3 | 28.5 |
| 37 | syringaldehyde | LS | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
| 38 | syringic acid methyl ester | LS | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| 39 | acetosyringone | LS | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.5 |
| 40 | syringylacetone | LS | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
| 41 | propiosyringone | LS | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| % Lignin | 52.1 | 42.7 | 36.6 | 29.9 | 26.9 | ||
| % Carbohydrates | 47.9 | 57.3 | 63.4 | 70.1 | 73.1 | ||
| Lignin/Carbohydrate ratio | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.4 | ||
| H | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | ||
| G | 26 | 21 | 20 | 17 | 16 | ||
| S | 23 | 19 | 14 | 11 | 9 | ||
| Syringyl/Guaiacyl ratio | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.6 | ||
| Ph-C0-2/Ph-C3b | 2.3 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 3.5 | 3.6 | ||
| % Cα-oxidized lignin | 12.3 | 15.7 | 16.5 | 17.4 | 19.2 | ||
| % Cα-oxidized G-units | 6.4 | 8.5 | 10.7 | 11.3 | 13.0 | ||
| % Cα-oxidized S-units | 5.9 | 7.2 | 5.8 | 6.1 | 6.2 | ||
aC, carbohydrate-derived compounds; LH, p-hydroxycinnamyl lignin-derived compounds; LG, guaiacyl-lignin derived compounds; S, syringyl-lignin derived compounds. bRatio of lignin-derived phenols with none, 1 and 2 carbons in the side-chain to lignin-derived phenols with 3 carbons in the side-chain
Fig. 3Relative amounts of Ph-C3 and Ph-C0-2 compounds originating from S- and G-units present in wheat straw and wood chips during Lentinula edodes treatment. □ Ph-C0-2 compounds originating from S-units ■ Ph-C3 compounds originating from S-units Δ Ph-C0-2 compounds originating from G-units ▲ Ph-C3 compounds originating from G-units
Fig. 4Percentage Cα-oxidized lignin units originating from S- and G-units present in wheat straw and wood chips during Lentinula edodes treatment. ▲total Cα-oxidized phenols ♦ Cα-oxidized products originating from S-units ■ Cα-oxidized products originating from G-units
Fig. 5Relation between in vitro gas production (IVGP) and the lignin to carbohydrates ratio (lignin/hemicellulose + cellulose) as determined by the detergent fiber analysis. □ wheat straw ■ wood chips, dashed line: potential maximum IVGP
Fig. 6Correlations between in vitro gas production (IVGP) and lignin/carbohydrate ratio, S/G ratio, Ph-C0-2/Ph-C3 ratio and %Cα-oxidized lignin. □ wheat straw ■ wood chips