| Literature DB >> 27688794 |
Emilia Maria Vaz Martins-Fonteyn1, Nina Sommerland2, Herman Meulemans2, Olivier Degomme3, Ines Raimundo4, Edwin Wouters2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Research has demonstrated a link between alcohol use and risky sexual behaviour among different types of migrant populations. Therefore, research investigating risk factors associated with alcohol consumption among them is a public health priority. This review aimed to explore the intersection between migration, alcohol consumption and risky sexual behaviour.Entities:
Keywords: Alcohol use; Migrant populations; Risky sexual behaviour
Year: 2016 PMID: 27688794 PMCID: PMC5034415 DOI: 10.1186/s12981-016-0117-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AIDS Res Ther ISSN: 1742-6405 Impact factor: 2.250
Alcohol use vs condom use
| Authors | Sample | Alcohol patterns measurements | Alcohol-related sexual risks | Association: alcohol use and sexual risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kissinger et al. [ | 180 male Latino immigrant workers | Frequency of alcohol use (last week) | Inconsistent condom use, Multiple sexual partners, paid sex | Migrant binge drinkers were more likely not to have used condom in their last sexual intercourse, in week before the survey (40 vs 21 % OR 2.11 CI 1.06–4.20, p < 0.05), compared to not binge drinkers |
| Zaller et al. [ | 358 female migrants working in entertainment venues | AUDIT >8 (problem drinking); >16 (probable dependence) (quantity of alcohol use) | Condom use (previous 6 months) | Female migrants working in entrainment Venus were more likely to have never used a condom during vaginal sex in the previous 6 months (OR 1.89 CI 1.12–3.11). Additionally, they had been drunk before their last sexual encounter (OR 2.24, CI 1.07–4.65), compared to less intoxicated women |
| Ford and Chamarathrithirong [ | 3426 Male migrant workers | Alcohol use before sex | Condom use | Migrants who reported drinking alcohol with sex workers were less likely to always use a condom (OR 0.67, CI 0.52–0.85, p < 0.001) than those who did not drink alcohol |
| Verma et al. [ | 7602 Male migrant workers, migrant FSWs, clients of FSWs | Alcohol use prior to sex (last month) | Number, type of sexual partners sex, multiple partners, paid sex condom use | This study found that inconsistent condom use with paid partners was significantly higher if the migrants workers, FSWs and clients of FSWs consumed alcohol prior to sex than when they did not (19 vs 39 % OR 2.7, CI 2.0–3.5, p < 0.001); (24 vs 43 % OR 3.0, CI 2.3–3.9, p < 0.001) and (24 vs 43 % OR 2.7, CI 2.0–3.5, p < 0.001), respectively |
| Sanchez [ | 278 male Latino immigrant workers | Frequency and quantity of alcohol, AUDIT, Unprotected sex under influence of alcohol in the past 30 days | Unprotected sex | This study revealed that migrants living in migrant camps were more likely to report unprotected sex while under influence of alcohol (OR 7.53 CI 4.31–13.09), compared to migrants who lived on their own or in someone else’s house |
| Organista and Kubo [ | 102 male Mexican/Latino immigrant workers | Quantity e frequency of alcohol use, (last 6 months) | Unprotected sex | This study did not find any significant associations between alcohol consumption and unprotected sex with FSWs (p < 0.052) |
| Wong et al. [ | 239 male sex workers, rural to urban migrants | Quantity of alcohol use (intoxication) | Condom use | Thirty four percent of male sex workers answered “yes” to the question “Have you ever had sex without a condom because you were under the influence of alcohol?” However no statistical tests were performed for this result so it is not possible to compare if condom use was more than when not under the influence of alcohol |
| Rojas et al. [ | 527 male Latino immigrants | Frequency and quantity of alcohol use; AUDIT (3 months prior to immigration sexual risk behaviour) | Unprotected sex | Findings of this study showed during pre-immigration, higher levels of alcohol use was associated with lower a lower frequency of condom use (ß = −0.15, p < 0.01), more sexual partners (b = 5.28, p < 0.001) and more recurrent exchanges of sex for money or drugs (b = 5.30, p < 0.001), as well as more sexual acts under the influence of alcohol (b = 5.52, p < 0.001) |
| Rao et al. [ | 4595 Male migrants | Frequency of alcohol use | Inconsistent condom use | Migrants who regularly consume alcohol were significantly more likely to have had unprotected sex with FSWs, than those who do not consume alcohol (29 vs 5 % OR 7.87 CI 4.62–13.40, p < 0.001) |
| Liu et al. [ | 307 male migrant MSM | Frequency of alcohol use | Condom use | The study concluded that alcohol intoxication was not significantly associated with condom use/non-use among migrant MSM |
| He et al. [ | 239 male migrant MSM-money boys and 100 general male migrant | Alcohol use before sex | Unprotected sex with casual partners | It was observed there was no statistical difference in terms of condom use under influence of alcohol, 34 % of participants from both groups reported having unprotected sex while under influence of alcohol (p = 0.347). However, migrant MSM presents the possibility for more risky sexual behaviour. For instance, MSM are more likely to have casual sex or one-night stands (82 vs 34 % p < 0.001) compared to general male migrant |
Alcohol use vs MSP, type of sexual partners (paid, non-paid/casual partners), and premarital sex
| Authors | Sample | Alcohol patterns measurements | Alcohol-related sexual risks | Association: alcohol use and sexual risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weine et al. [ | 400 male labour migrants | Heavy alcohol drinks (>3/week) | Number and type of sexual partners | Migrants that have more vaginal sex with women other than their steady sexual partners in the previous month had a significantly positive association with heavy alcohol drinking—imbibing more than three times per week (b = 0.24, p < 0.004) |
| Amirkhanian et al. [ | 499 Male labour migrants | Quantity and frequency of alcohol use | Total number of female sexual partners in the past year and in the past 3 months | This study revealed that the number of casual female partners over a 3 month period was considerably linked to alcohol use (b = 0.36 p < 0.004) and paid sex (OR 1.05 CI 1.02–1.09 p < 0.001) |
| Kissinger et al. [ | 180 male Latino immigrant workers | Frequency of alcohol use (last week) | Inconsistent condom use, multiple sexual partners, paid sex | Migrant binge drinkers are more likely to have high risk partners (FSWs), than those who did not drink large quantities of alcohol (74 vs 60 %, OR 2.20 CI 1.25–5.19, p < 0.05) |
| Verma et al. [ | 7602 Male migrant workers, migrant FSWs and migrant clients of FSWs | Alcohol use prior to sex (last month) | Number, type of sexual partners sex, multiple partners, paid sex condom use | The proportion of male migrant workers who reported sex with three or more partners was significantly higher among alcohol users than among non-users (13 vs 3 % OR 5.1, CI 4.0–6.5, p < 0.001) |
| Gupta et al. [ | 174.365 male permanent and temporary migrants | Frequency of alcohol use | Number and type of sexual partners; transactional sex; unprotected sex (Last 12 months), STI | Circular migrants—away from home for more than 1 month—who drink alcohol almost daily, are more likely to have two or more sexual partners, (12 vs 3 %, p < 0.001). They are more prone to have high risk sexual intercourse (14 vs 4 %, p < 0.001), and resort to paid sex (5 vs 3 %, p < 0.001) than those who are not mobile |
| Roy et al. [ | 437 male rural to urban migrant taxi drivers | Frequency of alcohol use | Patterns of sexual intercourse, types and numbers of sexual partners and condom use patterns | Migrants had higher odds of risky sexual behaviour such as patterns of sexual intercourse, types and number of sex partners, and condom use patterns—if they regularly drank alcohol (OR 8.7, CI 4.9–14.3, p < 0.001) |
| Tiruneh [ | 756 male seasonal migrants | Alcohol use at last sexual intercourse | Multiple sexual partners | Seasonal workers who consumed alcohol before sexual intercourse were 1.69 times more likely to have multiple sexual partners (≥2), during the preceding 6 months, as compared to those who did not drink alcohol (OR 1.69, CI 1.01–2.83, p < 0.046) |
| Althoff et al. [ | 113 male Latino immigrant men | Binge drinking (having five or more drinks in one sitting) | Multiple Sexual partnerships | Binge drinking was one of the primary predictors of multiple sexual partnership (OR 2.02 CI 1.22–3.35 p < 0.01) |
| Wilson et al. [ | 128 Male Mexican immigrants | Frequency of alcohol use | Sex with FSWs and STIs | This study revealed slightly more than 14 % of the men consumed alcohol 5 or more days per week and they reported to have sex with commercial sex worker in the year preceding the study (OR 35.8, CI 3.58–333.36, p < 0.002) |
| Lin et al. [ | 2.153 male young rural–urban migrants | Frequency and quantity of alcohol use, alcohol intoxication (last month) | Premarital sex, number of sexual partners, transactional sex, transactional sex | This study demonstrated that overall, intoxicated respondents were more likely to engage in premarital sex than those who had not been drinking (76 vs 60.2 %, OR 1.30, p < 0.001); to have multiple sexual partners (14 vs 5 %, OR 1.57, p < 0.001); to buy sex (13 vs 5 %, OR 1.88, p < 0.001); and to sell sex (10 vs 4 %, OR 1.99, p < 0.001). No significant difference was found between men and women |
| Chen et al. [ | 3026 male and female (rural migrants and rural and urban residents) | Frequency of alcohol use (intoxication) | Commercial sex | This showed the rural male migrant were more likely to engage in alcohol intoxication combined with commercial sex, than female rural migrant (9 vs 2 %). However, rural male migrants were less likely to combine alcohol intoxication to commercial sex, when compared to the non-migrant rural and urban residents (9 vs 9.8 vs 13 %, p < 0.05) |
Alcohol use, STI symptoms and HIV infections
| Authors | Sample | Alcohol patterns measurements | Alcohol-related sexual risks | Association: alcohol use and sexual risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surrat [ | 101 Female migrant sex workers | Life time alcohol use | STI | Migrant female workers also disclosed alcohol consumers were much more likely to report current STI symptoms than non-drinkers (OR 4.97 CI 1.51–16.20 p < 0.01) |
| Zuma et al. [ | 835 Female circular migrant women | Frequency of alcohol use | HIV prevalence | Findings of this study showed that drinking alcohol at least once a day over a 4 week period was associated with HIV prevalence (OR 1.92 CI 1.57–3.19) p < 0.011) |
| Nichols et al. [ | Predominantly Male work migrants; | Visiting of registered and unregistered drinking establishments | HIV infection | Increased prevalence of HIV was observed in neighbourhoods with high density of drinking establishments compared to those with a low density. This connection was even stronger when there was a high prevalence of unregistered drinking establishments known as shebeens (OR 3.02, CI 2.04-4.47; OR 1.71, CI 1.4; OR 1.55, CI 1.19–2.02) |
| Wilson et al. [ | 128 male Mexican immigrants | Frequency of alcohol use | Sex with FSWs and STIs | Immigrant Latino men who consumed alcohol 5 or more days per week had higher odds of reporting STIs (38 vs. 7.1 %, OR 7.8 CI 2.19–27.80, p < 0.002) than those who consumed alcohol less than 5 days a week |