| Literature DB >> 27688258 |
Petr Zacek1,2, Michael Bukowski3, Thad A Rosenberger4, Matthew Picklo3,5.
Abstract
Phosphatidylcholine (PC) species in human plasma are used as biomarkers of disease. PC biomarkers are often limited by the inability to separate isobaric PCs. In this work, we developed a targeted shotgun approach for analysis of isobaric and isomeric PCs. This approach is comprised of two MS methods: a precursor ion scanning (PIS) of mass m/z 184 in positive mode (PIS m/z +184) and MS3 fragmentation in negative mode, both performed on the same instrument, a hybrid triple quadrupole ion-trap mass spectrometer. The MS3 experiment identified the FA composition and the relative abundance of isobaric and sn-1, sn-2 positional isomeric PC species, which were subsequently combined with absolute quantitative data obtained by PIS m/z +184 scan. This approach was applied to the analysis of a National Institute of Standards and Technology human blood plasma standard reference material (SRM 1950). We quantified more than 70 PCs and confirmed that a majority are present in isobaric and isomeric mixtures. The FA content determined by this method was comparable to that obtained using GC with flame ionization detection, supporting the quantitative nature of this MS method. This methodology will provide more in-depth biomarker information for clinical and mechanistic studies.Entities:
Keywords: National Institute of Standards and Technology human blood plasma; docosahexaenoic acid; mass spectrometry; shotgun lipidomics; triple quadrupole/ion-trap
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27688258 PMCID: PMC5321225 DOI: 10.1194/jlr.D070656
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Lipid Res ISSN: 0022-2275 Impact factor: 5.922
Fig. 1.An MS3 spectrum of an equimolar mixture of isobaric PCs: PC1, PC 16:0_20:4; PC2, PC 18:2_18:2. dLPC fragments reflect the loss of the FA moiety as a ketene (28). An alternative fragmentation resulting in the loss of the neutral FA is represented as dLPC-18. PCs were analyzed as adducts with acetate in MP chloroform:methanol (1:1) with 10 mM ammonium acetate. Masses m/z 840.6 and 766.5 were selected for fragmentation.
Fig. 2.The correlation between estimated composition and composition determined using [dLPC]− (A, B) and [FA]− (C, D) ions after MS3 fragmentation of the isobaric PC mixture composed of saturated (A, C) and unsaturated (B, D) FAs. The concentration levels express the sum of the concentrations of both isobaric PCs in the particular saturated or unsaturated PC pair. The results for samples at 0.013 μM were identical to those observed for 0.033 nmol/ml and have been omitted for clarity. The dashed line shows where the points should lie in the case of an ideal agreement of the determined values with the actuals. Notice the sigmoidal dependency (C, D) when FA anions are used for composition of isobaric PCs at a concentration of 0.664 nmol/ml. The graph legends displayed in (A) and (B) are also valid for (C) and (D), respectively. The concentrations displayed in the legends exhibit the sum of the concentrations of examined pairs of PCs: PC 14:0_18:0 and PC 16:0_16:0 in (A) and (C) and PC 16:0_20:4 and PC 18:2_18:2 in (B) and (D). PCs were detected as acetate adducts. The analysis was performed using a MP consisting of chloroform:methanol (1:1) with addition of 10 mM of ammonium acetate. Bars represent mean ± SD of three repetitions.
Fig. 3.Dependence of the estimated mole percent of an isomeric PC mixture on the composition determined using [FA]− and [dLPC]− anions after MS3 fragmentation. Concentration of PC 34:1 was 0.065 nmol/ml. The MP consisted of a mixture of 5 mM ammonium chloride and ammonium acetate in a ratio of 1:4. Results are shown for acetate adducts. Bars represent mean ± SD of three repetitions.
Fig. 4.Concentration-dependence for determination of sn-1 versus sn-2 positional isomers. The graph shows a concentration influence on the signal ratios of anions [FA 14:0]− and [FA 18:0]−, and [dLPC 14:0]− and [dLPC 18:0]− expressed as relative abundance (percent) of [FA 14:0]− and [dLPC 14:0]− in the MS3 spectrum of PC 14:0_18:0. PC was detected as acetate adduct in negative mode. The analysis was performed using a MP consisting of chloroform:methanol (1:1) with addition of 10 mM of ammonium acetate. Bars represent mean ± SD of three repetitions.
Analysis of an NIST human blood plasma SRM (SRM 1950)
| Isobaric PC Distribution | ||||||||||
| PIS | MS3 | FA Moieties | [dLPC]− | [FA]− | ||||||
| [PC+H]+ ( | Brutto | [PC+59]− | [PC-15]− | Mean (nmol/ml) | SD (nmol/ml) | Mean (nmol/ml) | SD (nmol/ml) | Positional Isomer Ratio | ||
| 706.5 | PC 30:0 | 764.5 | 690.5 | C14:0 | C16:0 | 2.1 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 0.1 | — |
| 730.5 | PC 32:2 | 788.5 | 714.5 | C14:0 | C18:2 | 12.9 | 0.1 | 12.8 | 0.1 | 88 |
| C16:1 | C16:1 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 0.0 | — | ||||
| 732.6 | PC 32:1 | 790.6 | 716.5 | C14:0 | C18:1 | 2.4 | 0.1 | 2.7 | 0.1 | 84 |
| C16:0 | C16:1 | 13.2 | 0.3 | 12.8 | 0.3 | 83 | ||||
| 734.6 | PC 32:0 | 792.6 | 718.5 | C16:0 | C16:0 | 11.8 | 0.3 | 11.8 | 0.3 | — |
| 756.6 | PC 34:3 | 814.6 | 740.5 | C16:1 | C18:2 | 7.7 | 0.1 | 8.5 | 0.1 | 87 |
| C16:0 | C18:3 | 6.4 | 0.1 | 5.6 | 0.1 | 91 | ||||
| 758.6 | PC 34:2 | 816.6 | 742.5 | C16:0 | C18:2 | 403.1 | 4.7 | 403.1 | 4.7 | 89 |
| 760.6 | PC 34:1 | 818.6 | 744.6 | C16:0 | C18:1 | 190.4 | 2.6 | 190.4 | 2.6 | 89 |
| 762.6 | PC 34:0 | 820.6 | 746.6 | C16:0 | C18:0 | 1.9 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 0.3 | — |
| 780.6 | PC 36:5 | 838.6 | 764.5 | C16:1 | C20:4 | 4.9 | 0.1 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 95 |
| C16:0 | C20:5 | 8.7 | 0.1 | 10.1 | 0.1 | 94 | ||||
| 782.6 | PC 36:4 | 840.6 | 766.5 | C16:0 | C20:4 | 170.0 | 3.4 | 160.8 | 3.2 | 94 |
| C18:2 | C18:2 | 16.1 | 0.3 | 25.3 | 0.5 | — | ||||
| 784.6 | PC 36:3 | 842.6 | 768.6 | C16:0 | C20:3 | 63.6 | 0.8 | 59.0 | 0.7 | 92 |
| C18:1 | C18:2 | 68.5 | 0.9 | 73.1 | 0.9 | 86 | ||||
| 786.6 | PC 36:2 | 844.6 | 770.6 | C18:0 | C18:2 | 204.7 | 2.2 | 191.4 | 2.0 | 92 |
| C18:1 | C18:1 | 21.7 | 0.2 | 32.1 | 0.3 | — | ||||
| C16:0 | C20:2 | 6.6 | 0.1 | 9.5 | 0.1 | 85 | ||||
| 788.6 | PC 36:1 | 846.6 | 772.6 | C18:0 | C18:1 | 32.7 | 0.6 | 32.0 | 0.6 | 88 |
| C16:0 | C20:1 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 77 | ||||
| 806.6 | PC 38:6 | 864.6 | 790.5 | C16:0 | C22:6 | 42.6 | 0.8 | 40.3 | 0.8 | 95 |
| C18:2 | C20:4 | 5.8 | 0.1 | 8.2 | 0.2 | 81 | ||||
| 808.6 | PC 38:5 | 866.6 | 792.6 | C16:0 | C22:5 | 19.6 | 0.2 | 18.8 | 0.2 | 94 |
| C18:1 | C20:4 | 24.6 | 0.2 | 24.6 | 0.2 | 93 | ||||
| C18:2 | C20:3 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 0.0 | 66 | ||||
| C18:0 | C20:5 | 5.9 | 0.1 | 6.2 | 0.1 | 95 | ||||
| 810.6 | PC 38:4 | 868.6 | 794.6 | C16:0 | C22:4 | 7.1 | 0.2 | 8.6 | 0.3 | 91 |
| C18:1 | C20:3 | 9.7 | 0.3 | 14.8 | 0.4 | 89 | ||||
| C18:0 | C20:4 | 106.1 | 3.1 | 99.6 | 2.9 | 94 | ||||
| 812.6 | PC 38:3 | 870.6 | 796.6 | C18:0 | C20:3 | 37.3 | 0.6 | 37.3 | 0.6 | 91 |
| 814.6 | PC 38:2 | 872.6 | 798.6 | C18:0 | C20:2 | 9.3 | 0.3 | 9.8 | 0.3 | 86 |
| C18:1 | C20:1 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 42 | ||||
| C20:0 | C18:2 | 2.5 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 0.1 | 85 | ||||
| 832.6 | PC 40:7 | 890.6 | 816.6 | C18:1 | C22:6 | 4.8 | 0.3 | 4.8 | 0.3 | 93 |
| 834.6 | PC 40:6 | 892.6 | 818.6 | C18:0 | C22:6 | 16.9 | 0.6 | 16.6 | 0.6 | 95 |
| C18:1 | C22:5 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 2.3 | 0.1 | 93 | ||||
| 836.6 | PC 40:5 | 894.6 | 820.6 | C18:0 | C22:5 | 9.6 | 0.2 | 9.4 | 0.2 | 93 |
| C18:1 | C22:4 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 86 | ||||
| 838.6 | PC 40:4 | 896.6 | 822.6 | C18:0 | C22:4 | 4.4 | 0.2 | 4.4 | 0.2 | 91 |
The numbers represent the total number of carbons: total number of double bonds in the acyl moieties in the PCs.
First precursor, PC molecule with acetate adduct.
Second precursor, demethylated PC molecule.
Position of FA in the most abundant isomer (see Positional Isomer Ratio column).
Determination of abundance of isobaric PCs using dLPC fragments.
Results were obtained from four independent measurements.
Determination of abundance of the isobaric PCs using FA fragments.
Distribution of the isomeric PCs determined using dLPC fragments. The number indicates abundance of the PC having FA moieties in the configuration shown in the FA Moieties columns.
Fig. 5.Comparison of FA distribution in the PL of a NIST human plasma sample obtained by two different analytical approaches. In the cases of A and B, samples were analyzed using PIS m/z +184 followed by MS3 fragmentation for isobaric PC determination. Isobaric PCs were determined using A [dLPC]− and B [FA]− anions. The obtained data was recalculated for the individual FAs. In the case of C, the FA distribution was determined using GC-FID as methyl esters after transesterification. Methyl tetradecanoate analyzed by GC-FID was not used due to the fact that the analysis was influenced by coelution with methylated BHT. Bars represent mean ± 99% confidence interval of four repetitions.