Literature DB >> 27688257

Cranes and Crops: Investigating Farmer Tolerances toward Crop Damage by Threatened Blue Cranes (Anthropoides paradiseus) in the Western Cape, South Africa.

Julia L van Velden1, Tanya Smith2, Peter G Ryan3.   

Abstract

The Western Cape population of Blue Cranes (Anthropoides paradiseus) in South Africa is of great importance as the largest population throughout its range. However, Blue Cranes are strongly associated with agricultural lands in the Western Cape, and therefore may come into conflict with farmers who perceive them as damaging to crops. We investigated the viability of this population by exploring farmer attitudes toward crane damage in two regions of the Western Cape, the Swartland and Overberg, using semi-structured interviews. Perceptions of cranes differed widely between regions: farmers in the Swartland perceived crane flocks to be particularly damaging to the feed crop sweet lupin (65 % of farmers reported some level of damage by cranes), and 40 % of these farmers perceived cranes as more problematic than other common bird pests. Farmers in the Overberg did not perceive cranes as highly damaging, although there was concern about cranes eating feed at sheep troughs. Farmers who had experienced large flocks on their farms and farmers who ranked cranes as more problematic than other bird pests more often perceived cranes to be damaging to their livelihoods. Biographical variables and crop profiles could not be related to the perception of damage, indicating the complexity of this human-wildlife conflict. Farmers' need for management alternatives was related to the perceived severity of damage. These results highlight the need for location-specific management solutions to crop damage by cranes, and contribute to the management of this vulnerable species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attitudes; Cranes; Crop damage; Farmers; Human-wildlife conflict

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27688257     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0768-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  6 in total

1.  Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research.

Authors:  Kate Kelley; Belinda Clark; Vivienne Brown; John Sitzia
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.038

2.  A case study of landholder attitudes and behaviour toward the conservation of renosterveld, a critically endangered vegetation type in Cape Floral Kingdom, South Africa.

Authors:  Susan J Winter; Heidi Prozesky; Karen J Esler
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Changes in surface water supply across Africa with predicted climate change.

Authors:  Maarten de Wit; Jacek Stankiewicz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Biodiversity conservation and agricultural sustainability: towards a new paradigm of 'ecoagriculture' landscapes.

Authors:  Sara J Scherr; Jeffrey A McNeely
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Biodiversity conservation in tropical agroecosystems: a new conservation paradigm.

Authors:  Ivette Perfecto; John Vandermeer
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 6.  Review of anthraquinone applications for pest management and agricultural crop protection.

Authors:  Shelagh T DeLiberto; Scott J Werner
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.845

  6 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Winners and losers of land use change: A systematic review of interactions between the world's crane species (Gruidae) and the agricultural sector.

Authors:  Karoline Hemminger; Hannes König; Johan Månsson; Sonoko-Dorothea Bellingrath-Kimura; Lovisa Nilsson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 2.912

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.