Literature DB >> 27688255

A Large-Scale, Multiagency Approach to Defining a Reference Network for Pacific Northwest Streams.

Stephanie Miller1, Peter Eldred2, Ariel Muldoon3, Kara Anlauf-Dunn4, Charlie Stein4, Shannon Hubler5, Lesley Merrick5, Nick Haxton5, Chad Larson6, Andrew Rehn7, Peter Ode7, Jake Vander Laan8.   

Abstract

Aquatic monitoring programs vary widely in objectives and design. However, each program faces the unifying challenge of assessing conditions and quantifying reasonable expectations for measured indicators. A common approach for setting resource expectations is to define reference conditions that represent areas of least human disturbance or most natural state of a resource characterized by the range of natural variability across a region of interest. Identification of reference sites often relies heavily on professional judgment, resulting in varying and unrepeatable methods. Standardized methods for data collection, site characterization, and reference site selection facilitate greater cooperation among assessment programs and development of assessment tools that are readily shareable and comparable. We illustrate an example that can serve the broader global monitoring community on how to create a consistent and transparent reference network for multiple stream resource agencies. We provide a case study that offers a simple example of how reference sites can be used, at the landscape level, to link upslope management practices to a specific in-channel response. We found management practices, particularly areas with high road densities, have more fine sediments than areas with fewer roads. While this example uses data from only one of the partner agencies, if data were collected in a similar manner they can be combined and create a larger, more robust dataset. We hope that this starts a dialog regarding more standardized ways through inter-agency collaborations to evaluate data. Creating more consistency in physical and biological field protocols will increase the ability to share data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aquatic; Minimally disturbed; Monitoring; Reference site; Stream

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27688255     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0739-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  8 in total

1.  A GIS model of subsurface water potential for aquatic resource inventory, assessment, and environmental management.

Authors:  Matthew E Baker; Michael J Wiley; Martha L Carlson; Paul W Seelbach
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Coupling GIS and multivariate approaches to reference site selection for wadeable stream monitoring.

Authors:  Kevin J Collier; Andy Haigh; Johlene Kelly
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  The Aquatic Conservation Strategy of the Northwest Forest Plan.

Authors:  Gordon H Reeves; Jack E Williams; Kelly M Burnett; Kirsten Gallo
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition.

Authors:  John L Stoddard; David P Larsen; Charles P Hawkins; Richard K Johnson; Richard H Norris
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  The biological condition gradient: a descriptive model for interpreting change in aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  Susan P Davies; Susan K Jackson
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  Selecting objectively defined reference sites for stream bioassessment programs.

Authors:  Adam Gordon Yates; Robert C Bailey
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  A quantitative tool for assessing the integrity of southern coastal California streams.

Authors:  Peter R Ode; Andrew C Rehn; Jason T May
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  The European reference condition concept: A scientific and technical approach to identify minimally-impacted river ecosystems.

Authors:  Isabel Pardo; Carola Gómez-Rodríguez; Jean-Gabriel Wasson; Roger Owen; Wouter van de Bund; Martyn Kelly; Cathy Bennett; Sebastian Birk; Andrea Buffagni; Stefania Erba; Nicolas Mengin; John Murray-Bligh; Gisela Ofenböeck
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 7.963

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.