Literature DB >> 27687805

A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial in Total Hip Arthroplasty-Comparing Early Results Between the Direct Anterior Approach and the Posterior Approach.

Tze E Cheng1, Jason A Wallis2, Nicholas F Taylor3, Chris T Holden4, Paul Marks4, Catherine L Smith5, Michael S Armstrong6, Parminder J Singh6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We report a prospective randomized study comparing early clinical results between the direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterior approach (PA) in primary hip arthroplasty.
METHODS: Surgeries were performed by 2 senior hip arthroplasty surgeons. Seventy-two patients with complete data were assessed preoperatively 2, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively. The primary outcomes were the Western Ontario McMasters Arthritis Index and Oxford Hip Scores. Secondary outcome measures included the EuroQoL, 10-meter walk test, and clinical and radiographic parameters.
RESULTS: Data analyses showed no difference between DAA (n = 35) and PA (n = 37) groups when comparing total scores for primary outcomes. No significant differences were observed for 10-meter walk test, EuroQoL, and radiographic analyses. Subgroup analysis for surgeon 1 identified that the DAA group had shorter acute hospital stay, less postoperative opiate requirements, and smaller wounds. However, this was offset by increased operative time, higher intraoperative blood loss, and weaker hip flexion at 2 and 6 weeks. Subgroup analysis of items on the Western Ontario McMasters Arthritis Index and Oxford Hip Score identified that hip flexion activity favored the DAA group up to 6 weeks postoperatively. There was an 83% incidence of lateral cutaneous nerve of thigh neuropraxia at the 12-week mark in the DAA group. No neuropraxias occurred in the PA group. One dislocation occurred in each group. A single patient from the DAA group required reoperation for leg-length discrepancy.
CONCLUSION: DAA total hip arthroplasty (THA) has comparable results with PA THA. Choice of surgical approach for THA should be based on patient factors, surgeon preference, and experience.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  THA; direct anterior approach; posterior approach; prospective randomized trial; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27687805     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  37 in total

1.  Comparative outcomes between collared versus collarless and short versus long stem of direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and indirect meta-analysis.

Authors:  Phonthakorn Panichkul; Suthorn Bavonratanavech; Alisara Arirachakaran; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-07-30

Review 2.  Comparison of direct anterior, lateral, posterior and posterior-2 approaches in total hip arthroplasty: network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chinundorn Putananon; Harit Tuchinda; Alisara Arirachakaran; Siwadol Wongsak; Thana Narinsorasak; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-09-27

3.  Incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in Asian patients after direct anterior total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gerald Joseph Zeng; Sheng Xu; Hee Nee Pang
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-08-29

4.  Acetabular and Femoral Component Positioning Using Direct Anterior Approach Versus Posterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tarun Goyal; Arghya Kundu Choudhury; Souvik Paul; Tushar Gupta; Lakshmana Das
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  The direct anterior approach without traction table: How does it compare with the posterior approach? - A prospective non-randomised trial.

Authors:  Tarun Goyal; Arghya Kundu Choudhury; Souvik Paul; Lakshmana Das; Tushar Gupta
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-06-21

6.  Short-term outcomes vary by surgical approach in total hip arthroplasty: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aaron Gazendam; Anthony Bozzo; Seper Ekhtiari; Colin Kruse; Nancy Hiasat; Daniel Tushinski; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 2.928

7.  Safely transitioning to the direct anterior from posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takahito Yuasa; Katsuhiko Maezawa; Hironobu Sato; Yuichiro Maruyama; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-03-23

8.  CORR Insights®: No Difference in Functional, Radiographic, and Survivorship Outcomes Between Direct Anterior or Posterior Approach THA: 5-Year Results of a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Mark J Spangehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  A Protocol of Pose Avoidance in Place of Hip Precautions After Posterior-Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty May Not Increase Risk of Post-operative Dislocation.

Authors:  Erica Fritz Eannucci; Brian T Barlow; Kaitlin M Carroll; Peter K Sculco; Seth A Jerabek; David J Mayman
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-08-05

10.  A multimodal approach prevents instability after total hip arthroplasty: A 1 year follow-up prospective study.

Authors:  Omar Amado; Maria Bautista; Jose Moore; Guillermo Bonilla; Nicolas Jimenez; Adolfo Llinás
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-11-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.