| Literature DB >> 27687573 |
Jizhou Jiang1,2, Jing Zou3, Andrew Thye Shen Wee2, Wenjing Zhang1.
Abstract
Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (<span class="Chemical">SERS) substrates with high activity and stability are desirable for <span class="Chemical">SERS sensing. Here, we report a new single atomic layer graphitic-C3N4 (S-g-C3N4) and Ag nanoparticles (NPs) hybrid as high-performance SERS substrates. The SERS mechanism of the highly stable S-g-C3N4/Ag substrates was systematically investigated by a combination of experiments and theoretical calculations. From the results of XPS and Raman spectroscopies, it was found that there was a strong interaction between S-g-C3N4 and Ag NPs, which facilitates the uniform distribution of Ag NPs over the edges and surfaces of S-g-C3N4 nanosheets, and induces a charge transfer from S-g-C3N4 to the oxidizing agent through the silver surface, ultimately protecting Ag NPs from oxidation. Based on the theoretical calculations, we found that the net surface charge of the Ag atoms on the S-g-C3N4/Ag substrates was positive and the Ag NPs presented high dispersibility, suggesting that the Ag atoms on the S-g-C3N4/Ag substrates were not likely to be oxidized, thereby ensuring the high stability of the S-g-C3N4/Ag substrate. An understanding of the stability mechanism in this system can be helpful for developing other effective SERS substrates with long-term stability.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27687573 PMCID: PMC5043347 DOI: 10.1038/srep34599
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1SEM image of bulk g-C3N4 (a), TEM images of S-g-C3N4 (b,c), Ag NPs colloid (d), S-g-C3N4/Ag hybrid (e), and XRD patterns of S-g-C3N4 and S-g-C3N4/Ag (f). The inset of (c) was HRTEM image of the as-prepared S-g-C3N4 in the delimited area of (c).
Figure 2SERS spectra of CV (2.5 × 10−6 mol L−1) on S-g-C3N4/Ag (a), Ag NPs colloid (b) and S-g-C3N4 (c). The normal Raman spectra of CV powder (d), S-g-C3N4 (e) and CV solution (2.5 × 10−6 mol L−1) (f) were given for comparison. The Raman measured conditions are: an excitation laser of 532 nm with, a power of 1 mW, the sample exposure times of 1, and the collect exposure time of 0.2 s.
Figure 3The relationships between SERS intensity and storing time of substrate materials of Ag NPs colloid (a) and S-g-C3N4/Ag (b), respectively. The peak intensity at 1619 cm−1 of CV was used as a reference. The SERS measured conditions are: an excitation laser of 532 nm with, a power of 1 mW, the sample exposure times of 1, and the collect exposure time of 0.2 s.
Figure 4N 1s XPS spectra (a) and of Raman spectra (b) of S-g-C3N4 and S-g-C3N4/Ag, respectively. The Raman measured conditions are: an excitation laser of 780 nm with, a power of 24 mW, the sample exposure times of 30, and the collect exposure time of 0.2 s.
Figure 5Schematic illustration of the charge transfer process among S-g-C3N4, O2 and Ag
. The label δ− denotes the negative charge of Ag surface or S-g-C3N4.
Figure 6The optimized geometries of g-C3N4/Agn (n = 1) (a,b), the geometries of g-C3N4/Agn of before and after optimization: n = 4 (c,d), n = 7 (e,f), respectively. Red, gray and purple spheres represent C, N and Ag atoms, respectively.
Milliken atomic charge distributions of Ag atoms in the different optimized geometries of g-C3N4/Agn and Agn systems.
| Sample | Atomic Categories | Charge | Sample | Atomic Categories | Charge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-g-C3N4/Ag | Ag (1) | 0.401 | Ag | Ag (1) | 0.000 |
| Total charge | Total charge | ||||
| S-g-C3N4/Ag2 | Ag (1) | 0.185 | Ag2 | Ag (1) | 0.000 |
| Ag (2) | −0.075 | Ag (2) | 0.000 | ||
| Total charge | Total charge | ||||
| S-g-C3N4/Ag4 | Ag (1) | 0.085 | Ag4 | Ag (1) | −0.147 |
| Ag (2) | 0.051 | Ag (2) | 0.147 | ||
| Ag (3) | 0.208 | Ag (3) | 0.148 | ||
| Ag (4) | −0.042 | Ag (4) | −0.147 | ||
| Total charge | Total charge | ||||
| S-g-C3N4/Ag7 | Ag (1) | −0.030 | Ag7 | Ag (1) | −0.026 |
| Ag (2) | 0.172 | Ag (2) | −0.025 | ||
| Ag (3) | 0.025 | Ag (3) | −0.026 | ||
| Ag (4) | −0.027 | Ag (4) | −0.025 | ||
| Ag (5) | −0.039 | Ag (5) | −0.026 | ||
| Ag (6) | 0.153 | Ag (6) | 0.064 | ||
| Ag (7) | 0.169 | Ag (7) | 0.064 | ||
| Total charge | Total charge | ||||
| S-g-C3N4/Ag8 | Ag (1) | 0.042 | Ag8 | Ag (1) | 0.095 |
| Ag (2) | 0.135 | Ag (2) | −0.034 | ||
| Ag (3) | 0.024 | Ag (3) | −0.012 | ||
| Ag (4) | −0.066 | Ag (4) | −0.035 | ||
| Ag (5) | 0.021 | Ag (5) | 0.021 | ||
| Ag (6) | 0.044 | Ag (6) | −0.012 | ||
| Ag (7) | 0.036 | Ag (7) | 0.021 | ||
| Ag (8) | 0.140 | Ag (8) | −0.043 | ||
| Total charge | Total charge | ||||
Figure 7The optimized geometries of S-g-C3N4/(3-Agn): (a) n = 1, (b) n = 2, (c) n = 4 and (d) n = 7, respectively.