Literature DB >> 27687409

Evaluating sepsis training for medical students and nonphysicians in Malawi.

P Marshall-Brown1, F Namboya1, G Pollach2.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether (regarding the Surviving Sepsis Campaign [SSC] guidelines) the training of Malawis scarce medical staff is adequate. Hospitals in Malawi have a severe shortage of human resources and therefore rely heavily on junior staff. Sepsis is a leading cause of admission to hospitals particularly in resource poor countries. It is associated with a high mortality rate. The SSC guidelines have been developed to help frontline staff diagnose and treat patients with sepsis.
DESIGN: A questionnaire consisting of 10 multiple choice questions, which was to be completed before and after a teaching module.
SETTING: Anesthesia courses at the University of Malawi. INTERVENTION: Participants had to answer the questionnaire before and after their teaching block on anesthetics and critical care. The medical students have a 2-week teaching block, and the nonmedical staff have an intensive 3-day training course. MBBS 1 was asked only once as a baseline. PARTICIPANTS: 168 medical students and 31 nonphysician staff returned 345 questionnaires (return rate, 97.1%). MEASUREMENTS: A total of 345 anonymous multiple choice questionnaires were completed. The same questionnaire was then repeated after their teaching block on anesthesia and critical care (not MBBS 1). The aim was for us to assess the knowledge the students had of sepsis. Overall 67% of the questions were answered correctly (2299 correct answers of 3450). The MBBS IV students had an average score of 68% to 72%, and the MBBS I students had a score of 42%. The highest score was achieved by the nonphysician clinical staff after their teaching as they improved by 11% (65%-76%).
CONCLUSIONS: Medical students and health care workers have a lack of knowledge regarding the SSC guidelines which needs to be addressed via training. The medical student teaching was not as effective as the nonphysician clinical staff course, and therefore, we need to think about restructuring their teaching block by having an intensive "Sepsis Day" that focuses on the SSC guidelines.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Africa; Anesthesia in Africa; Critical care; Medical student teaching; Surviving Sepsis Campaign

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27687409     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  5 in total

1.  Factors influencing awareness of healthcare providers on maternal sepsis: a mixed-methods approach.

Authors:  Vanessa Brizuela; Mercedes Bonet; João Paulo Souza; Özge Tunçalp; Kasisomayajula Viswanath; Ana Langer
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  What Do We Know about Early Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock in Polish Hospitals? A Questionnaire Study.

Authors:  Łukasz J Krzych; Agnieszka Wiórek; Paweł Zatorski; Karol Gruca; Karina Stefańska-Wronka; Janusz Trzebicki
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-01

3.  Improving sepsis care in Africa: an opportunity for change?

Authors:  Alexander James Keeley; Emmanuel Nsutebu
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2021-12-06

4.  The Effect of a Sepsis Interprofessional Education Using Virtual Patient Telesimulation on Sepsis Team Care in Clinical Practice: Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Wei Ling Chua; Sim Leng Ooi; Gene Wai Han Chan; Tang Ching Lau; Sok Ying Liaw
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  On prioritising global health's triple crisis of sepsis, COVID-19 and antimicrobial resistance: a mixed-methods study from Malawi.

Authors:  Paul Kawale; Levi Kalitsilo; Jessie Mphande; Bayode Romeo Adegbite; Martin P Grobusch; Shevin T Jacob; Jamie Rylance; Nyovani J Madise
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 2.908

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.