Literature DB >> 27687251

Fully automated structural MRI of the brain in clinical dementia workup.

Karin Persson1,2,3, Geir Selbæk1,4,5, Anne Brækhus1,2,3,6, Mona Beyer7, Maria Barca1,2, Knut Engedal1,2.   

Abstract

Background The dementia syndrome has been regarded a clinical diagnosis but the focus on supplemental biomarkers is increasing. An automatic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volumetry method, NeuroQuant® (NQ), has been developed for use in clinical settings. Purpose To evaluate the clinical usefulness of NQ in distinguishing Alzheimer's disease dementia (AD) from non-dementia and non-AD dementia. Material and Methods NQ was performed in 275 patients diagnosed according to the criteria of ICD-10 for AD, vascular dementia and Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD); the Winblad criteria for mild cognitive impairment; the Lund-Manchester criteria for frontotemporal dementia; and the revised consensus criteria for Lewy body dementia (LBD). Receiver operating curve (ROC) analyses with calculation of area under the curve (AUC) and regression analyses were carried out. Results Forebrain parenchyma (AUC 0.82), hippocampus (AUC 0.80), and inferior lateral ventricles (AUC 0.78) yielded the highest AUCs for AD/non-dementia discrimination. Only hippocampus (AUC 0.62) and cerebellum (AUC 0.67) separated AD from non-AD dementia. Cerebellum separated AD from PDD-LBD (AUC 0.83). Separate multiple regression analyses adjusted for age and gender, showed that memory (CERAD 10-word delayed recall) (beta 0.502, P < 0.001) was more strongly associated to the hippocampus volume than the diagnostic distinction of AD versus non-dementia (beta -0.392, P < 0.001). Conclusion NQ measures could separate AD from non-dementia fairly well but generally poorer from non-AD dementia. Degree of memory impairment, age, and gender, but not diagnostic distinction, were associated to the hippocampus volume in adjusted analyses. Surprisingly, cerebellum was found relevant in separating AD from PDD-LBD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s disease; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); age; dementia; diagnostic discriminatory power; volumetry

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27687251     DOI: 10.1177/0284185116669874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  10 in total

1.  Prediction of Amyloid Positivity in Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Fully Automated Brain Segmentation Software.

Authors:  Chul-Ho Sohn; Dong Young Lee; Koung Mi Kang; Min Soo Byun; Jun Ho Lee; Dahyun Yi; Younghwa Lee; Jun-Young Lee; Yu Kyeong Kim; Bo Kyung Sohn; Roh-Eul Yoo; Tae Jin Yun; Seung Hong Choi; Ji-Hoon Kim
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.570

2.  Automated analysis of cortical volume loss predicts seizure outcomes after frontal lobectomy.

Authors:  Alexander C Whiting; Marcia Morita-Sherman; Manshi Li; Deborah Vegh; Brunno Machado de Campos; Fernando Cendes; Xiaofeng Wang; William Bingaman; Lara E Jehi
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 3.  Revisiting the link between cognitive decline and masticatory dysfunction.

Authors:  Chia-Shu Lin
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.921

4.  Dementia imaging in clinical practice: a European-wide survey of 193 centres and conclusions by the ESNR working group.

Authors:  M W Vernooij; F B Pizzini; R Schmidt; M Smits; T A Yousry; N Bargallo; G B Frisoni; S Haller; F Barkhof
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  [18F]FDG, [11C]PiB, and [18F]AV-1451 PET Imaging of Neurodegeneration in Two Subjects With a History of Repetitive Trauma and Cognitive Decline.

Authors:  David O Okonkwo; Ross C Puffer; Davneet S Minhas; Sue R Beers; Kathryn L Edelman; Jane Sharpless; Charles M Laymon; Brian J Lopresti; Steven Benso; Ava M Puccio; Sudhir Pathak; Milos D Ikonomovic; Joseph M Mettenburg; Walter Schneider; Chester A Mathis; James M Mountz
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Structural and Functional Deficits in Patients with Poststroke Dementia: A Multimodal MRI Study.

Authors:  Huaying Cai; Zhiyong Zhao; Linhui Ni; Guocan Han; Xingyue Hu; Dan Wu; Xianjun Ding; Jin Wang
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 7.  Updated Review of the Evidence Supporting the Medical and Legal Use of NeuroQuant® and NeuroGage® in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  David E Ross; John Seabaugh; Jan M Seabaugh; Justis Barcelona; Daniel Seabaugh; Katherine Wright; Lee Norwind; Zachary King; Travis J Graham; Joseph Baker; Tanner Lewis
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 3.473

Review 8.  [Expert Opinions and Recommendations for the Clinical Use of Quantitative Analysis Software for MRI-Based Brain Volumetry].

Authors:  Ji Young Lee; Ji Eun Park; Mi Sun Chung; Se Won Oh; Won-Jin Moon
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2021-07-14

Review 9.  Technical and clinical validation of commercial automated volumetric MRI tools for dementia diagnosis-a systematic review.

Authors:  Hugh G Pemberton; Lara A M Zaki; Olivia Goodkin; Ravi K Das; Rebecca M E Steketee; Frederik Barkhof; Meike W Vernooij
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 10.  Beyond the average patient: how neuroimaging models can address heterogeneity in dementia.

Authors:  Serena Verdi; Andre F Marquand; Jonathan M Schott; James H Cole
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 13.501

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.