Literature DB >> 27687123

How Power Affects People: Activating, Wanting, and Goal Seeking.

Ana Guinote1,2.   

Abstract

Sociocognitive research has demonstrated that power affects how people feel, think, and act. In this article, I review literature from social psychology, neuroscience, management, and animal research and propose an integrated framework of power as an intensifier of goal-related approach motivation. A growing literature shows that power energizes thought, speech, and action and orients individuals toward salient goals linked to power roles, predispositions, tasks, and opportunities. Power magnifies self-expression linked to active parts of the self (the active self), enhancing confidence, self-regulation, and prioritization of efforts toward advancing focal goals. The effects of power on cognitive processes, goal preferences, performance, and corruption are discussed, and its potentially detrimental effects on social attention, perspective taking, and objectification of subordinates are examined. Several inconsistencies in the literature are explained by viewing power holders as more flexible and dynamic than is usually assumed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  approach motivation; corruption; dominance; goal seeking; self-regulation; social power

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27687123     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol        ISSN: 0066-4308            Impact factor:   24.137


  23 in total

1.  Adversarial alignment enables competing models to engage in cooperative theory building toward cumulative science.

Authors:  Naomi Ellemers; Susan T Fiske; Andrea E Abele; Alex Koch; Vincent Yzerbyt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Hierarchy stability moderates the effect of status on stress and performance in humans.

Authors:  Erik L Knight; Pranjal H Mehta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Children's social evaluation toward prestige-based and dominance-based powerholders.

Authors:  Masahiro Amakusa; Xianwei Meng; Yasuhiro Kanakogi
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2022-05-15

4.  Individual differences in social power: Links with beliefs about emotion and emotion regulation.

Authors:  Felicia K Zerwas; Jordan A Tharp; Serena Chen; Iris B Mauss
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2022-04-22

5.  Social Power Increases Interoceptive Accuracy.

Authors:  Mehrad Moeini-Jazani; Klemens Knoeferle; Laura de Molière; Elia Gatti; Luk Warlop
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-03

6.  Social Justice and Public Cooperation Intention: Mediating Role of Political Trust and Moderating Effect of Outcome Dependence.

Authors:  Shuwei Zhang; Jie Zhou
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-14

7.  Exploring Role of Personal Sense of Power in Facilitation of Employee Creativity: A Dual Mediation Model Based on the Derivative View of Self-Determination Theory.

Authors:  Hao Zhou; Hao He
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2020-06-23

8.  Dominant men are faster in decision-making situations and exhibit a distinct neural signal for promptness.

Authors:  Janir da Cruz; João Rodrigues; John C Thoresen; Vitaly Chicherov; Patrícia Figueiredo; Michael H Herzog; Carmen Sandi
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Repeatedly adopting power postures does not affect hormonal correlates of dominance and affiliative behavior.

Authors:  Hannah Metzler; Julie Grèzes
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  A Matter of Feelings: Mediators' Perceptions of Emotion in Hierarchical Workplace Conflicts.

Authors:  Meriem Kalter; Katalien Bollen; Martin Euwema; Alain-Laurent Verbeke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.