| Literature DB >> 27686746 |
Rui-Ping Sun1,2, Qian-Yun Xi1, Jia-Jie Sun1, Xiao Cheng1, Yan-Ling Zhu1, Ding-Ze Ye1, Ting Chen1, Li-Min Wei1,2, Rui-Song Ye1, Qing-Yan Jiang1, Yong-Liang Zhang1.
Abstract
Ammonia detoxification, which takes place via the hepatic urea cycle, is essential for nitrogen homeostasis and physiological well-being. It has been reported that a reduction in dietary protein reduces urea nitrogen. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are major regulatory non-coding RNAs that have significant effects on several metabolic pathways; however, little is known on whether miRNAs regulate hepatic urea synthesis. The objective of this study was to assess the miRNA expression profile in a low protein diet and identify miRNAs involved in the regulation of the hepatic urea cycle using a porcine model. Weaned 28-days old piglets were fed a corn-soybean normal protein diet (NP) or a corn-soybean low protein diet (LP) for 30 d. Hepatic and blood samples were collected, and the miRNA expression profile was assessed by sequencing and qRT-PCR. Furthermore, we evaluated the possible role of miR-19b in urea synthesis regulation. There were 25 differentially expressed miRNAs between the NP and LP groups. Six of these miRNAs were predicted to be involved in urea cycle metabolism. MiR-19b negatively regulated urea synthesis by targeting SIRT5, which is a positive regulator of CPS1, the rate limiting enzyme in the urea cycle. Our study presented a novel explanation of ureagenesis regulation by miRNAs.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27686746 PMCID: PMC5043173 DOI: 10.1038/srep33291
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Validation of differentially expressed miRNAs by qPCR, Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 6).
*P < 0.05. LP: low protein die, NP: normal protein diet.
Figure 2KEGG pathway analysis of most abundant miRNAs.
Figure 3MiRNAs targeting the urea cycle network.
The different miRNAs were analysed; six miRNAs participated in the urea cycle.
Figure 4Low protein diet induces urea synthesis in weaned piglet liver.
(A) Serum urea nitrogen; (B) CPS1 and SIRT5 protein expression. Data are presented as mean ± SD. (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, n = 6). LP: low protein die, NP: normal protein diet.
Figure 5MiR-19b directly targets SIRT5.
(A) Three 3′-UTR sequences containing normal, mutagenic, or deleted binding sites were inserted downstream of the luciferase reporter. Eight nucleotides of SIRT5 3′ UTR were mutated or deleted to disrupt the binding with miR-19b seed regions. (B) Schematic diagram showing dual-luciferase reporter constructs of pig SIRT5 3′ UTR with putative miR-19b-3p binding site. (C) Constructed vectors were transfected into CHO cells with NC or miR-19b mimic. The luciferase assay results revealed significant differences between NC and miR-19b-mimic groups transfected with vectors containing normal SIRT5 3′-UTR (*P < 0.05, n = 8).
Figure 6Transfection with miR-19b mimic and inhibitor.
Pig primary hepatocytes were treated with miR-19b mimic, miR-19b inhibitor, or their corresponding negative controls. MiR-19b expression in pig primary hepatocytes was measured by qRT-PCR after 48 h post-transfection. (A,B) Data are presented as mean ± SD (*P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, n = 6).
Figure 7MiR-19b regulates ureagenesis in pig primary hepatocytes.
(A) Urea concentration in hepatocytes treated with miR-19b mimic, inhibitor, or negative control. Data are presented as mean ± SD (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, n = 6). (B) Western blot results showed that SIRT5 protein and CPS1 protein expression in primary hepatocytes was significantly decreased by miR-19b mimic versus control; miR-19b inhibitor rescued this effect. Data are presented as mean ± SD (*P < 0.05, n = 6).
Figure 8Combination trial of miR-inhibitor and SIRT5 siRNA Primary hepatocytes co-transfected with SIRT5 siRNA and miR-19b inhibitor or inhibitor negative control, (A) urea concentration in hepatocytes supernatant was assayed by urea nitrogen assay kit. Data are presented as mean ± SD (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01,n = 6); (B) The protein expression of SIRT5 and CPS1 were simultaneously detected by western blotting. Data are presented as mean ± SD (*P < 0.05, n = 6).
Composition (g/kg) and nutritional value of dietsa.
| Ingredients | Content (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| 17.00 | 20.00 | |
| Corn | 66.50 | 63.70 |
| Soybean meal | 18.80 | 19.80 |
| Dried whey | 4.30 | 4.30 |
| fish meal | 4.00 | 9.00 |
| Soybean oil | 2.60 | 0.80 |
| L-lysine | 0.62 | 0.38 |
| DL-methionine | 0.19 | 0.10 |
| L-threonine | 0.21 | 0.09 |
| DL-tryptophan | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| Calcium hydrophosphate | 0.74 | 0.00 |
| Limestone | 0.70 | 0.52 |
| Salt | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| 1% premix compound | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Total | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| DE (MJ/kg) | 14.60 | 14.60 |
| CP | 17.00 | 20.00 |
| Total Ca | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| Total P | 0.55 | 0.57 |
| Lys | 1.23 | 1.23 |
| Met + Cys | 0.68 | 0.68 |
| Thr | 0.73 | 0.73 |
| Trp | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| Arg | 0.91 | 1.09 |
| His | 0.40 | 0.46 |
| Ile | 0.60 | 0.70 |
| Leu | 1.32 | 1.49 |
| Phe | 0.69 | 0.80 |
| Val | 0.65 | 0.77 |
| EAA/NEAA | 0.80 | 0.70 |
| Recommendation rate of NRC (2012) | 0.80 | 0.80 |
aDiets contain 17%, and 20% CP, respectively, with appropriate crystalline AA supplementation.
bThe values are expressed as percentage (%), except for DE (MJ/kg), EAA/NEAA, and recommendation rate of NRC(2012).
cPremix provided these amounts of vitamins and minerals per kilogram on an as-fed basis: vitamin A, 10 800 IU; vitamin D3, 4000 IU; vitamin E, 40 IU; vitamin K3, 4 mg; vitamin B1, 6 mg; vitamin B2, 12 mg; vitamin B6, 6 mg; vitamin B12, 0.05 mg; biotin, 0.2 mg; folic acid, 2 mg; niacin, 50 mg; D-calcium pantothenate, 25 mg; Fe, 100 mg as ferrous sulfate; Cu, 150 mg as copper sulphate; Mn, 40 mg as manganese oxide; Zn, 100 mg as zinc oxide; I, 0.5 mg as potassium iodide; and Se, 0.3 mg as sodium selenite.