| Literature DB >> 27686745 |
José R Castro Smirnov1, Qi Zhang2, Reinhold Wannemacher1, Longfei Wu1, Santiago Casado1, Ruidong Xia2, Isabel Rodriguez1, Juan Cabanillas-González1.
Abstract
The fabrication of all polymer optical waveguides, based on a highly fluorescent conjugated polymer (CP) poly(9,9-dioctylfluorene-alt-benzothiadiazole) (F8BT) and a mechanically flexible and biodegradable polymer, cellulose acetate (CA), is reported. The replication by hot embossing of patterned surfaces in CA substrates, onto which high quality F8BT films can be easily processed by spin coating, is exploited to produce an entirely plastic device that exhibits low optical loss and low threshold for amplified spontaneous emission (ASE). As a result, highly transparent and flexible waveguides are obtained, with excellent optical properties that remain unaltered after bending, allowing them to be adapted in various flexible photonic devices.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27686745 PMCID: PMC5043348 DOI: 10.1038/srep34565
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Transmittance spectra of CAISWG (green dash dot dot line), QISWG (blue short dash), ARWG (red solid line), SRWG (black dash line) and the used CA substrate (purple short dash dot). Simulation of TE00 waveguide mode profiles at the wavelength of 570 nm in (b) ARWG and (c) SRWG.
Figure 2(a) Normalized output spectra of CAISWG (black solid line with squares), QISWG (red solid line with circles), ARWG (green solid line with triangles) and SRWG (blue solid line with stars). (b) Full widths at half-maximum values and their emission peak intensities of CAISWG (black and blue squares respectively) and SRWG (black and blue circles respectively), as a function of the incident laser fluence. (c) Dependence of the emission intensity at λASE on the length of the unpumped region between the edge of the excitation stripe and the substrate edge of ARWGs (black triangles) and SRWGs (red circles). Black solid line and red solid line represent a linear fit of each data set.
ASE peak wavelengths, FWHM values, ASE power density thresholds, loss and gain coefficients and calculated confinement factors (Γ) for QISWG, CAISWG, ARWG and SRWG.
| Sample | ASE Peak (nm) | FWHM (nm) | Threshold (kW/cm2) | Loss (cm−1) | Gain (cm−1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QISWG | 571,6 | 7,1 | 18.6 | 5.7 | 13.4 | 0.804 |
| CAISWG | 571,5 | 9,7 | 29.3 | 10.5 | 14.9 | 0.97 |
| ARWG | 573,4 | 9,6 | 18.6 | 8.1 | 14.3 | 0.798 |
| SRWG | 569,1 | 8,9 | 9.3 | 3.1 | 12.2 | 0.773 |
Gain measurements were performed at a pump power density just above the threshold of each sample.
Figure 3(a) Photograph of a bent ARWG substrate. (b) Variation of the ARWG threshold values with the bending angle. The measurements were carried out 5 times at each angle. Error bars represent the standard deviation of these values.