Literature DB >> 27686380

Effects of field conditions on fecal microbiota.

Vanessa L Hale1, Chia L Tan2, Kefeng Niu3, Yeqin Yang4, Duoying Cui5, Hongxia Zhao6, Rob Knight7, Katherine R Amato8.   

Abstract

Gut microbiota can provide great insight into host health, and studies of the gut microbiota in wildlife are becoming more common. However, the effects of field conditions on gut microbial samples are unknown. This study addresses the following questions: 1) How do environmental factors such as sunlight and insect infestations affect fecal microbial DNA? 2) How does fecal microbial DNA change over time after defecation? 3) How does storage method affect microbial DNA? Fresh fecal samples were collected, pooled, and homogenized from a family group of 6 spider monkeys, Ateles geoffroyi. Samples were then aliquoted and subjected to varying light conditions (shade, sun), insect infestations (limited or not limited by netting over the sample), and sample preservation methods (FTA - Fast Technology for Analysis of nucleic acid - cards, or freezing in liquid nitrogen then storing at -20°C). Changes in the microbial communities under these conditions were assessed over 24h. Time and preservation method both effected fecal microbial community diversity and composition. The effect size of these variables was then assessed in relation to fecal microbial samples from 2 other primate species (Rhinopithecus bieti and R. brelichi) housed at different captive institutions. While the microbial community of each primate species was significantly different, the effects of time and preservation method still remained significant indicating that these effects are important considerations for fieldwork.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Environmental conditions; Fecal microbial community; Fecal preservation; Gut microbiota; Primates

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27686380     DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.363


  10 in total

1.  Diet Versus Phylogeny: a Comparison of Gut Microbiota in Captive Colobine Monkey Species.

Authors:  Vanessa L Hale; Chia L Tan; Kefeng Niu; Yeqin Yang; Rob Knight; Qikun Zhang; Duoying Cui; Katherine R Amato
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Improving the standards for gut microbiome analysis of fecal samples: insights from the field biology of Japanese macaques on Yakushima Island.

Authors:  Takashi Hayakawa; Akiko Sawada; Akifumi S Tanabe; Shinji Fukuda; Takushi Kishida; Yosuke Kurihara; Kei Matsushima; Jie Liu; Etienne-Francois Akomo-Okoue; Waleska Gravena; Makoto Kashima; Mariko Suzuki; Kohmei Kadowaki; Takafumi Suzumura; Eiji Inoue; Hideki Sugiura; Goro Hanya; Kiyokazu Agata
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 2.163

Review 3.  Are microbiome studies ready for hypothesis-driven research?

Authors:  Anupriya Tripathi; Clarisse Marotz; Antonio Gonzalez; Yoshiki Vázquez-Baeza; Se Jin Song; Amina Bouslimani; Daniel McDonald; Qiyun Zhu; Jon G Sanders; Larry Smarr; Pieter C Dorrestein; Rob Knight
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 7.934

4.  Taxonomy, not locality, influences the cloacal microbiota of two nearctic colubrids: a preliminary analysis.

Authors:  Jason W Dallas; Walter E Meshaka; Lydia Zeglin; Robin W Warne
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  Captivity Shapes the Gut Microbiota of Andean Bears: Insights into Health Surveillance.

Authors:  Andrea Borbón-García; Alejandro Reyes; Martha Vives-Flórez; Susana Caballero
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Coenzyme B12 synthesis as a baseline to study metabolite contribution of animal microbiota.

Authors:  Antoine Danchin; Sherazade Braham
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.813

7.  Effects of preservation method on canine (Canis lupus familiaris) fecal microbiota.

Authors:  Katti R Horng; Holly H Ganz; Jonathan A Eisen; Stanley L Marks
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Evaluation of DESS as a storage medium for microbial community analysis.

Authors:  Kevin M Lee; Madison Adams; Jonathan L Klassen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Evaluation of RNAlater as a Field-Compatible Preservation Method for Metaproteomic Analyses of Bacterium-Animal Symbioses.

Authors:  Marlene Jensen; Juliane Wippler; Manuel Kleiner
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-10-27

Review 10.  Microbiota transplantation: concept, methodology and strategy for its modernization.

Authors:  Faming Zhang; Bota Cui; Xingxiang He; Yuqiang Nie; Kaichun Wu; Daiming Fan
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 14.870

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.