BACKGROUND: There is limited information on the multiple long-term effects of the biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS). METHODS: Patients who consented to a BPD/DS from 1999 to 2010 were evaluated for weight change, complications, comorbidity resolution, body composition, quality of life, and depressive symptoms during visits at 1, 3,5, 7, and 9 years. Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, and pair-wise comparisons were calculated for each of the five follow-up cohorts vs. the baseline cohort. RESULTS: Between 1999 and 2010, 284 patients received a BPD/DS; 275 patients (69.8 % women) age 42.7 years, BMI 53.4 kg/m2 qualified for baseline analysis. Two hundred seventy-five patients were available in year 1; 275 patients in year 3; 273 patients in year 5; 259 patients in year 7; and 228 patients in year 9. Gender distribution was not different. BMI was 30.1 at 1 year and 32.0 at 9 years. Body fat was reduced to 26 % after 2 years. Complications requiring surgery were significant. Nutritional problems developed in 29.8 % of patients over the course of observation. The baseline Beck Depression Index (BDI) was 13.9 and 7.2 in year 1. Year 1 through 9 remained unchanged. There were significant positive changes in quality of life between baseline and year 1 for most domains. These positive changes were maintained for the follow-up cohorts. After surgery the resolution of comorbidities continued for the 9 years. CONCLUSIONS: Weight loss during the first year was well maintained, resolving comorbidities and improving quality of life. Rates of surgical complications resemble other bariatric procedures. Long-term nutrient deficiencies are of concern.
BACKGROUND: There is limited information on the multiple long-term effects of the biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS). METHODS:Patients who consented to a BPD/DS from 1999 to 2010 were evaluated for weight change, complications, comorbidity resolution, body composition, quality of life, and depressive symptoms during visits at 1, 3,5, 7, and 9 years. Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, and pair-wise comparisons were calculated for each of the five follow-up cohorts vs. the baseline cohort. RESULTS: Between 1999 and 2010, 284 patients received a BPD/DS; 275 patients (69.8 % women) age 42.7 years, BMI 53.4 kg/m2 qualified for baseline analysis. Two hundred seventy-five patients were available in year 1; 275 patients in year 3; 273 patients in year 5; 259 patients in year 7; and 228 patients in year 9. Gender distribution was not different. BMI was 30.1 at 1 year and 32.0 at 9 years. Body fat was reduced to 26 % after 2 years. Complications requiring surgery were significant. Nutritional problems developed in 29.8 % of patients over the course of observation. The baseline Beck Depression Index (BDI) was 13.9 and 7.2 in year 1. Year 1 through 9 remained unchanged. There were significant positive changes in quality of life between baseline and year 1 for most domains. These positive changes were maintained for the follow-up cohorts. After surgery the resolution of comorbidities continued for the 9 years. CONCLUSIONS: Weight loss during the first year was well maintained, resolving comorbidities and improving quality of life. Rates of surgical complications resemble other bariatric procedures. Long-term nutrient deficiencies are of concern.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bariatric surgery complications; Biliopancreatic diversion with the duodenal switch; Body composition after surgical weight loss; Obesity surgery; Quality of life after bariatric surgery
Authors: William F Gourash; Faith Ebel; Kathy Lancaster; Abidemi Adeniji; Laurie Koozer Iacono; Jessie K Eagleton; Anne MacDougall; Chelsea Cassady; Hallie Ericson; Walter Pories; Bruce M Wolfe; Steven H Belle Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2013-03-15 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Hilde Risstad; Torgeir T Søvik; My Engström; Erlend T Aasheim; Morten W Fagerland; Monika Fagevik Olsén; Jon A Kristinsson; Carel W le Roux; Thomas Bøhmer; Kåre I Birkeland; Tom Mala; Torsten Olbers Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Gladys W Strain; Jack Wang; Michel Gagner; Alfons Pomp; William B Inabnet; Steven B Heymsfield Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2008-06-12 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: T T Søvik; O Taha; E T Aasheim; M Engström; J Kristinsson; S Björkman; C F Schou; H Lönroth; T Mala; T Olbers Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Blaire Anderson; Richdeep S Gill; Christopher J de Gara; Shahzeer Karmali; Michel Gagner Journal: Gastroenterol Res Pract Date: 2013-11-21 Impact factor: 2.260
Authors: G W Strain; R L Kolotkin; G F Dakin; M Gagner; W B Inabnet; P Christos; T Saif; R Crosby; A Pomp Journal: Nutr Diabetes Date: 2014-09-01 Impact factor: 5.097
Authors: Piotr Małczak; Magdalena Mizera; Yung Lee; Magdalena Pisarska-Adamczyk; Michał Wysocki; Małgorzata M Bała; Jan Witowski; Mateusz Rubinkiewicz; Alicja Dudek; Tomasz Stefura; Grzegorz Torbicz; Piotr Tylec; Natalia Gajewska; Tanawat Vongsurbchart; Michael Su; Piotr Major; Michał Pędziwiatr Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2021-10-11 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Ronette L Kolotkin; Valerie S L Williams; Lisa von Huth Smith; Henrik Hjorth Meincke; Shanshan Qin; Nicole Williams; Sheri E Fehnel Journal: Clin Obes Date: 2021-07-22