Literature DB >> 27686218

Comparison of diagnostic validity of mannitol and methacholine challenges and relationship to clinical status and airway inflammation in steroid-naïve asthmatic patients.

Konstantinos Porpodis1, Kalliopi Domvri1, Theodoros Kontakiotis1, Evangelia Fouka1, Eirini Kontakioti1, Konstantinos Zarogoulidis1, Despina Papakosta1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate and compare the diagnostic validity of two bronchial challenges and to investigate their correlation with patient clinical status, atopy and inflammation markers.
METHODS: Eighty-eight patients, 47 women and 41 men, mean age 38.56 ± 16.73 years who presented with asthma related symptoms and were not on any anti-asthma medication, were challenged with mannitol and methacholine on separate days. Medical history regarding asthmatic symptoms, physical examination, skin prick tests and FeNO levels were also assessed. The clinical diagnosis of asthma was based on bronchodilator reversibility test.
RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were diagnosed with asthma and 21 without asthma. Both methacholine (P < 0.014) and mannitol (P < 0.000) challenges were significant in diagnosing asthma. The positive/negative predictive value was 93.33%/41.86% for methacholine, 97.72%/45.45% for mannitol and 97.05%/45.45%. for both methods assessed together. Worthy of note that 22% of asthmatics had both tests negative. There was a negative correlation between PC20 of methacholine and the FeNO level P < 0.001, and positive with the PD15 of mannitol P < 0.001 and the pre-test FEV1% pred P < 0.005, whereas PD15 of mannitol was negatively correlated with the FeNO level P < 0.001. Furthermore, dyspnea was the only asthmatic symptom associated with FeNO level P < 0.035 and the positivity of mannitol P < 0.014 and methacholine P < 0.04.
CONCLUSIONS: Both challenge tests were equivalent in diagnosing asthma. Nevertheless, specificity appeared to be slightly higher in mannitol challenge.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Airway inflammation; mannitol; methacholine; validity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27686218     DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2016.1238926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Asthma        ISSN: 0277-0903            Impact factor:   2.515


  3 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of methacholine challenge tests assessing airway hyperreactivity in asthmatic patients - a multifunctional approach.

Authors:  Richard Kraemer; Hans-Jürgen Smith; Thomas Sigrist; Gabi Giger; Roland Keller; Martin Frey
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2016-11-17

2.  Nanoparticle-based thymulin gene therapy therapeutically reverses key pathology of experimental allergic asthma.

Authors:  Adriana L da Silva; Gisele P de Oliveira; Namho Kim; Fernanda F Cruz; Jamil Z Kitoko; Natalia G Blanco; Sabrina V Martini; Justin Hanes; Patricia R M Rocco; Jung Soo Suk; Marcelo M Morales
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 3.  Comparison of methacholine and mannitol challenges: importance of method of methacholine inhalation.

Authors:  Donald W Cockcroft; Beth E Davis; Christianne M Blais
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.406

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.