Literature DB >> 27686089

The Diversity and Prevalence of Sexual Orientation Self-Labels in a New Zealand National Sample.

Lara M Greaves1, Fiona Kate Barlow2,3, Carol H J Lee4, Correna M Matika4, Weiyu Wang4, Cinnamon-Jo Lindsay4, Claudia J B Case4, Nikhil K Sengupta4, Yanshu Huang4, Lucy J Cowie4, Samantha Stronge4, Mary Storey5, Lucy De Souza6, Sam Manuela4, Matthew D Hammond7, Petar Milojev8, Carly S Townrow4, Emerald Muriwai9, Nicole Satherley4, Gloria Fraser7, Tim West-Newman10, Carla Houkamau11, Joseph Bulbulia12, Danny Osborne4, Marc S Wilson7, Chris G Sibley4.   

Abstract

In this study, we asked participants to "describe their sexual orientation" in an open-ended measure of self-generated sexual orientation. The question was included as part of the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study (N = 18,261) 2013/2014 wave, a national probability survey conducted shortly after the first legal same-sex marriages in New Zealand. We present a two-level classification scheme to address questions about the prevalence of, and demographic differences between, sexual orientations. At the most detailed level of the coding scheme, 49 unique categories were generated by participant responses. Of those who responded with the following, significantly more were women: bisexual (2.1 % of women, compared to 1.5 % of men), bicurious (0.7 % of women, 0.4 % of men), and asexual (0.4 % of women and less than 0.1 % of men). However, significantly fewer women than men reported being lesbian or gay (1.8 % of women, compared to 3.5 % of men). Those openly identifying as bicurious, bisexual, or lesbian/gay were significantly younger than those with a heterosexual orientation. This study shows diversity in the terms used in self-generated sexual orientations, and provides up-to-date gender, age, and prevalence estimates for the New Zealand population. Finally, results reveal that a substantial minority of participants may not have understood the question about sexual orientation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asexuality; Heteronormativity; Heterosexuality; Pansexuality; Sexual identity; Sexual orientation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27686089     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-016-0857-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  6 in total

1.  A Scoping Review of Empirical Asexuality Research in Social Science Literature.

Authors:  Samantha Guz; Hillary K Hecht; Shanna K Kattari; E B Gross; Emily Ross
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-05-23

2.  Asexual Identity, Personality, and Social Motivations in a New Zealand National Sample.

Authors:  Samantha Stronge; Lara M Greaves; Chris G Sibley; Fiona Kate Barlow
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-10-20

3.  Sexual Language Use in U.S. College Students Across Twenty Years.

Authors:  Sarah K Murnen; Paige E Bullock; Eleanor J Tetreault; Sydney A Matteson; Lauren Redman
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-06-28

4.  Relying on an "Other" Category Leads to Significant Misclassification of Sexual Minority Participants.

Authors:  Tierney K Lorenz
Journal:  LGBT Health       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.151

5.  Brief Report: Sexual Wellbeing in Heterosexual, Mostly Heterosexual, and Bisexually Attracted Men and Women.

Authors:  Tierney K Lorenz
Journal:  Int J Sex Health       Date:  2019-07-05

6.  Differences by sexual orientation in treatment outcome and satisfaction with treatment among inpatients of a German psychiatric clinic.

Authors:  Martin Plöderl; Robert Mestel; Clemens Fartacek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.