BACKGROUND: Treating inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) using thiopurines is effective; however, a high rate of adverse effects and lack of efficacy limit its use. Retrospective studies have suggested that treatment with low-dose thiopurines in combination with allopurinol is associated with higher remission rates and lower incidence of adverse events. AIM: To compare the rates of clinical remission and the rates of adverse events in IBD patients treated with either standard treatment withazathioprine or low-dose azathioprine in combination with allopurinol. METHODS: A prospective, open-label study, randomizing thiopurine-naïve IBD patients with normal thiopurine methyltransferase to 24 weeks of treatment with eitherstandard azathioprine dose or low-dose azathioprine and allopurinol. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease were randomized. We conducted an intention to treat analysis and found a significant (69.6%) proportion of the patients treated with low-dose azathioprine in combination with allopurinol was in clinical remission without the need for steroid or biologic treatment at week 24 compared to 34.7% of the patients treated with azathioprine monotherapy (RR, 2.10 [95% CI: 1.07-4.11]). In the azathioprine group, 47.8% of the patients compared to 30.4% of the patients in the azathioprine-allopurinol group had to withdraw from the study due to adverse events (RR, 1.47 [95% CI: 0.76-2.85]) Conclusions: This study indicated that by changing the treatment strategy from standard weight-based dosing of azathioprine to weight-based low-dose azathioprine in combination with allopurinol, we can increase remission rates in patients with IBD.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Treating inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) using thiopurines is effective; however, a high rate of adverse effects and lack of efficacy limit its use. Retrospective studies have suggested that treatment with low-dose thiopurines in combination with allopurinol is associated with higher remission rates and lower incidence of adverse events. AIM: To compare the rates of clinical remission and the rates of adverse events in IBDpatients treated with either standard treatment with azathioprine or low-dose azathioprine in combination with allopurinol. METHODS: A prospective, open-label study, randomizing thiopurine-naïve IBDpatients with normal thiopurine methyltransferase to 24 weeks of treatment with either standard azathioprine dose or low-dose azathioprine and allopurinol. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease were randomized. We conducted an intention to treat analysis and found a significant (69.6%) proportion of the patients treated with low-dose azathioprine in combination with allopurinol was in clinical remission without the need for steroid or biologic treatment at week 24 compared to 34.7% of the patients treated with azathioprine monotherapy (RR, 2.10 [95% CI: 1.07-4.11]). In the azathioprine group, 47.8% of the patients compared to 30.4% of the patients in the azathioprine-allopurinol group had to withdraw from the study due to adverse events (RR, 1.47 [95% CI: 0.76-2.85]) Conclusions: This study indicated that by changing the treatment strategy from standard weight-based dosing of azathioprine to weight-based low-dose azathioprine in combination with allopurinol, we can increase remission rates in patients with IBD.
Entities:
Keywords:
Azathioprine; allopurinol; inflammatory bowel disease; randomized study
Authors: Christopher Andrew Lamb; Nicholas A Kennedy; Tim Raine; Philip Anthony Hendy; Philip J Smith; Jimmy K Limdi; Bu'Hussain Hayee; Miranda C E Lomer; Gareth C Parkes; Christian Selinger; Kevin J Barrett; R Justin Davies; Cathy Bennett; Stuart Gittens; Malcolm G Dunlop; Omar Faiz; Aileen Fraser; Vikki Garrick; Paul D Johnston; Miles Parkes; Jeremy Sanderson; Helen Terry; Daniel R Gaya; Tariq H Iqbal; Stuart A Taylor; Melissa Smith; Matthew Brookes; Richard Hansen; A Barney Hawthorne Journal: Gut Date: 2019-09-27 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Pedro R Chocair; Precil Diego Miranda de Menezes Neves; Sara Mohrbacher; Maurilio Pacheco Neto; Victor A H Sato; Érico S Oliveira; Leonardo V Barbosa; Alessandra M Bales; Fagner Pereira da Silva; Américo L Cuvello-Neto; John A Duley Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2022-06-10 Impact factor: 8.786
Authors: Sally A Coulthard; Phil Berry; Sarah McGarrity; Simon McLaughlin; Azhar Ansari; Christopher P F Redfern Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Berrie Meijer; Margien L Seinen; Remco van Egmond; Gerd Bouma; Chris J J Mulder; Adriaan A van Bodegraven; Nanne K H de Boer Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Marianne Kiszka-Kanowitz; Klaus Theede; Sandra Bohn Thomsen; Jacob Tveiten Bjerrum; Jørn Brynskov; Ida Benedikte Gottschalck; Elena Akimenko; Karen Lisa Hilsted; Anders Neumann; Signe Wildt; Lone Larsen; Jens Kristian Munk; Per Holger Ibsen; Huma Gul Rehana Janjua; Lise Lotte Gluud; Anette Mertz-Nielsen Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2022-03-05