Yi Lu1, Baocheng Jiang, Tao Liu. 1. Department of General Surgery, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital, Suzhou, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic total gastrectomy for advanced proximal gastric carcinoma is a complex and challenging procedure, limited to a few expert centers. This study analyzed the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for advanced proximal gastric carcinoma compared with open gastrectomy. METHODS: From January 2008 to January 2015, 61 patients underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy for advanced proximal gastric carcinoma. They were matched and compared to 61 patients who underwent a conventional open operation. Short-term operative and postoperative outcomes as well as long-term outcomes, including overall survival and disease-free survival rates, were assessed. RESULTS: Patients were well matched for several preoperative factors. Overall postoperative 30-day complication rates were significantly higher for the open group. No significant difference was seen in 5-year overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival between the open and laparoscopic groups. The same result was seen in subgroup analyses of TNM stage. CONCLUSION: This study shows the feasibility of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for advanced proximal gastric carcinoma compared to open resection in regard to both short- and long-term outcomes. Laparoscopic surgery offers many advantages commonly attributed to laparoscopy and is well suited for proximal gastric carcinoma when performed by experienced surgeons.
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic total gastrectomy for advanced proximal gastric carcinoma is a complex and challenging procedure, limited to a few expert centers. This study analyzed the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for advanced proximal gastric carcinoma compared with open gastrectomy. METHODS: From January 2008 to January 2015, 61 patients underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy for advanced proximal gastric carcinoma. They were matched and compared to 61 patients who underwent a conventional open operation. Short-term operative and postoperative outcomes as well as long-term outcomes, including overall survival and disease-free survival rates, were assessed. RESULTS:Patients were well matched for several preoperative factors. Overall postoperative 30-day complication rates were significantly higher for the open group. No significant difference was seen in 5-year overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival between the open and laparoscopic groups. The same result was seen in subgroup analyses of TNM stage. CONCLUSION: This study shows the feasibility of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for advanced proximal gastric carcinoma compared to open resection in regard to both short- and long-term outcomes. Laparoscopic surgery offers many advantages commonly attributed to laparoscopy and is well suited for proximal gastric carcinoma when performed by experienced surgeons.
Authors: Huizheng Bao; Na Xu; Zhongkun Li; Hongtao Ren; Hong Xia; Na Li; Hao Yu; Janbiao Wei; Chengyi Jiang; Lu Liu Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Piotr Małczak; Grzegorz Torbicz; Mateusz Rubinkiewicz; Natalia Gajewska; Nadia Sajuk; Kamil Rozmus; Michał Wysocki; Piotr Major; Andrzej Budzyński; Michał Pędziwiatr Journal: Cancer Manag Res Date: 2018-12-06 Impact factor: 3.989