Literature DB >> 27684982

Physician Satisfaction With Clinical Laboratory Services: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of 81 Institutions.

Shannon J McCall1, Rhona J Souers, Barbara Blond, Larry Massie.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: -Assessment of customer satisfaction is a vital component of the laboratory quality improvement program.
OBJECTIVE: -To survey the level of physician satisfaction with hospital clinical laboratory services.
DESIGN: -Participating institutions provided demographic information and survey results of physician satisfaction, with specific features of clinical laboratory services individually rated on a scale of 5 (excellent) to 1 (poor).
RESULTS: -Eighty-one institutions submitted 2425 surveys. The median overall satisfaction score was 4.2 (10th percentile, 3.6; 90th percentile, 4.6). Of the 16 surveyed areas receiving the highest percentage of excellent/good ratings (combined scores of 4 and 5), quality of results was highest along with test menu adequacy, staff courtesy, and overall satisfaction. Of the 4 categories receiving the lowest percentage values of excellent/good ratings, 3 were related to turnaround time for inpatient "STAT" (tests performed immediately), outpatient STAT, and esoteric tests. The fourth was a new category presented in this survey: ease of electronic order entry. Here, 11.4% (241 of 2121) of physicians assigned below-average (2) or poor (1) scores. The 5 categories deemed most important to physicians included quality of results, turnaround times for inpatient STAT, routine, and outpatient STAT tests, and clinical report format. Overall satisfaction as measured by physician willingness to recommend their laboratory to another physician remains high at 94.5% (2160 of 2286 respondents).
CONCLUSIONS: -There is a continued trend of high physician satisfaction and loyalty with clinical laboratory services. Physician dissatisfaction with ease of electronic order entry represents a new challenge. Test turnaround times are persistent areas of dissatisfaction, representing areas for improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27684982     DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2015-0486-CP

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  4 in total

1.  Use of microbiology tests in the era of increasing AMR rates- a multicentre hospital cohort study.

Authors:  Brita Skodvin; Jannicke S Wathne; P Christoffer Lindemann; Stig Harthug; Roy M Nilsen; Esmita Charani; Heidi Syre; Baard R Kittang; Lars K S Kleppe; Ingrid Smith
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.887

2.  Simple signature/countersignature shared-accountability quality improvement initiative to improve reliability of blood sample collection: an essential clinical task.

Authors:  Chenwei Wu; Chatty O'Keeffe; Jesse Sanford; Jean Hagel; Shelia Childs; Gary Evers; Julie Melbourne; Collyn West; Michael Koch; Paul B Cornia
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2022-09

3.  Physicians' satisfaction with clinical referral laboratories in Rwanda.

Authors:  Vincent Rusanganwa; Jean Bosco Gahutu; Anna-Karin Hurtig; Magnus Evander
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 2.640

4.  Structured Annual Faculty Review Program Accelerates Professional Development and Promotion: Long-Term Experience of the Duke University Medical Center's Pathology Department.

Authors:  Stanley J Robboy; Roger McLendon
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2017-03-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.