| Literature DB >> 27683623 |
Herpreet Thind1, Ernestine Jennings2, Joseph L Fava2, Marie A Sillice3, Bruce M Becker4, Sheri J Hartman5, Beth C Bock3.
Abstract
This study compares the characteristics of men and women, respectively, participating in two randomized controlled pilot studies whose primary aims were to test the feasibility of yoga as a complementary therapy for smoking cessation. Participants were aged 18-65, generally healthy and were daily smokers. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square tests examined gender differences in smoking rate, potential treatment mediators, and covariates (e.g., smoking history, health status, weight concerns, mood, and prior withdrawal symptoms). A total of 55 women and 38 men participated in the study. Differences between men and women at enrollment included: women reported significantly greater withdrawal (p<0.005), anxiety (p=0.032), and depression (p=0.027) symptoms than men. More women than men (91% vs. 66%) reported having been told by their doctor to quit smoking (p=0.003), had an existing smoking-related illness (33% vs. 13%; p=0.032), and reported smoking for weight control (15% vs. 0%; p=0.014). Results showed good feasibility for recruiting both men and women into a study using yoga as a complementary therapy for smoking cessation. Results also indicate that interventions may need to be tailored to meet different needs (e.g., addressing co-morbid depression) between men and women.Entities:
Keywords: Complementary therapies; Gender; Smoking cessation; Yoga
Year: 2016 PMID: 27683623 PMCID: PMC5036391 DOI: 10.4172/2157-7595.1000245
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Yoga Phys Ther ISSN: 2157-7595
Baseline characteristics by gender.
| Men | Women | p-value | Effect | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Size[ | ||||
| (n=38) | (n=55) | |||
| Age, mean (SD) | 39.9 (13.7) | 45.6 (8.3) |
| 0.54 |
| Education, % | 0.342 | <0.35 | ||
| Less than high school | 10.5 | 12.7 | ||
| High school | 31.6 | 21.8 | ||
| Some college | 15.8 | 30.9 | ||
| College Graduate | 42.1 | 34.5 | ||
| White, % | 94.6 | 83.3 | 0.106 | 0.35 |
| Household income, % | (n=32) | (n=49) | 0.331 | <0.35 |
| Under $10,000 | 12.5 | 22.4 | ||
| $10,000-$29,999 | 25.0 | 16.3 | ||
| $30,000-$50,000 | 28.1 | 38.8 | ||
| Over $50,000 | 34.4 | 22.4 | ||
| Employed, % | 71.1 | 54.5 | 0.108 | 0.35 |
| Married status, % | 0.527 | <0.35 | ||
| Single | 34.2 | 24.5 | ||
| Married or living with significant other | 36.8 | 47.2 | ||
| Divorced/Widowed/Separated | 28.9 | 28.3 | ||
| Children under 18, Yes % | 21.6 | 40.0 | 0.065 | 0.40 |
| Age when started smoking, mean (SD) | 17.0 (6.7) | 18.3 (6.8) | 0.349 | <0.35 |
| Smoking rate, mean (SD) | 15.7 (6.8) | 18.6 (8.4) |
|
|
| Times made serious attempt, mean (SD) | 3.6 (3.3) | 3.2 (3.4) | 0.570 | <0.35 |
| Fagerstrom Nicotine Dependence, mean (SD) | 4.8 (2.4) | 5.0 (1.4) | 0.585 | <0.35 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||
|
|
| |||
| Stage of change for smoking, % | 0.072 | 0.38 | ||
| Contemplation | 42.1 | 61.1 | ||
| Preparation | 57.9 | 38.9 | ||
| Confidence to quit, mean (SD) | 4.5 (1.3) | 4.9 (1.3) | 0.249 | <0.35 |
| Smoking Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, mean (SD) | 2.6 (0.8) | 2.5 (1.0) | 0.730 | <0.35 |
| Smoking Situations Temptations, mean (SD) | 30.5 (6.0) | 32.2 (6.5) | 0.220 | <0.35 |
| Doctor told to quit, Yes % | 65.8 | 90.9 |
| 0.64 |
| Disease caused by smoking, Yes % | 13.2 | 32.7 |
| 0.48 |
| Another smoker in the house. Yes % | 28.9 | 30.9 | 0.84 | <0.35 |
| Withdrawal symptoms, mean (SD) | 34.9 (9.4) | 41.6 (11.5) |
| 0.63 |
| Smoke to control weight, Yes % | 0 | 14.5 |
| 0.60 |
| Being afraid of gaining weight kept from quitting in | 0.74 | |||
| past, mean (SD) | 1.6 (1.0) | 2.6 (1.6) |
| |
| Smoking Situations Questionnaire: SSQ, mean (SD) | 1.8 (0.8) | 2.2 (1.1) |
| 0.41 |
| CESD-10, mean, SD | 7.4 (4.6) | 9.9 (5.6) |
| 0.48 |
| STAIT total score, mean, SD | 38.4 (9.1) | 43.3 (11.3) |
| 0.47 |
Welch robust test was used because of homogeneity of variance violations
Note that effect sizes are either given as Cohen’s d for independent means or Cohen’s h for independent proportions and these values have similar interpretations, with 0.20, 0.50, and 0.80 representing, respectively, small, medium and large effect sizes
Significant