| Literature DB >> 27682197 |
Marek Pająk1, Ewa Błońska2, Magdalena Frąc3, Karolina Oszust3.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to assess the impact of metal contamination on microbial functional diversity and enzyme activity in forest soils. This study involved the evaluation of the influence of the texture, carbon content and distance to the source of contamination on the change in soil microbial activity, which did not investigate in previous studies. The study area is located in southern Poland near the city of Olkusz around the flotation sedimentation pond of lead and zinc at the Mining and Metallurgical Company "ZGH Bolesław, Inc.". The central point of the study area was selected as the middle part of the sedimentation pond. The experiment was conducted over a regular 500 × 500-m grid, where 33 sampling points were established. Contents of organic carbon and trace elements (Zn, Pb and Cd), pH and soil texture were investigated. The study included the determination of dehydrogenase and urease activities and microbial functional diversity evaluation based on the community-level physiological profiling approach by Biolog EcoPlate. The greatest reduction in the dehydrogenase and urease activities was observed in light sandy soils with Zn content >220 mg · kg-1 and a Pb content > 100 mg · kg-1. Soils with a higher concentration of fine fraction, despite having the greatest concentrations of metals, were characterized by high rates of Biolog®-derived parameters and a lower reduction of enzyme activity.Entities:
Keywords: Dehydrogenase and urease activities; Microbial functional diversity; Soil contamination
Year: 2016 PMID: 27682197 PMCID: PMC5003905 DOI: 10.1007/s11270-016-3051-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Water Air Soil Pollut ISSN: 0049-6979 Impact factor: 2.520
Fig. 1Location of the sampling points
The characteristics of soil taken from different group of substrates (SS1, SS2, LS, S)
| DH (μM TPF·kg−1 soil·h−1) | UR (mM N-NH4·kg−1 soil·h−1) | pH in H2O | pH in KCl | Organic C (%) | Sand | Silt | Clay | Zn | Pb | Cd | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | (mg · kg−1 soil) | ||||||||||
| SS1 | a0.10 ± 0.14 | a0.80 ± 0.04 | c7.47 ± 0.69 | c7.35 ± 0.89 | a0.54 ± 0.44 | a95 ± 1.8 | a3 ± 1.5 | a2 ± 0.7 | b555.1 ± 145.8 | b199.2 ± 91.8 | ab3.3 ± 2.1 |
| SS2 | a0.38 ± 0.32 | a1.16 ± 0.11 | b6.24 ± 0.77 | b5.64 ± 0.96 | a0.52 ± 0.51 | a95 ± 2.2 | a1 ± 1.2 | b4 ± 1.1 | b220.8 ± 346.3 | b107.1 ± 146.9 | a1.5 ± 1.8 |
| S | a0.27 ± 0.35 | a1.23 ± 0.22 | b6.80 ± 0.33 | b6.48 ± 0.43 | a1.99 ± 0.57 | a91 ± 1.7 | a5 ± 1.3 | b4 ± 1.1 | b960.5 ± 265.2 | b278.6 ± 93.2 | b9.7 ± 3.9 |
| CS | b4.55 ± 2.08 | b3.34 ± 1.96 | a4.48 ± 0.20 | a3.45 ± 0.15 | a0.93 ± 0.57 | a84 ± 1.2 | a15 ± 1.8 | a1 ± 0.6 | a5.9 ± 3.8 | a14.5 ± 7.8 | a0.1 ± 0.1 |
| LS | a11.17 ± 11.43 | a2.59 ± 0.08 | a7.63 ± 0.75 | a7.40 ± 0.93 | a4.38 ± 3.86 | a60 ± 15.9 | a31 ± 13.4 | a9 ± 3.1 | b3164.2 ± 2253.2 | b1202.8 ± 711.3 | b15.7 ± 10.3 |
| CL | b39.31 ± 4.0 | b6.80 ± 1.43 | a6.59 ± 0.19 | a6.34 ± 0.16 | a5.38 ± 0.43 | a54 ± 3.9 | a33 ± 2.3 | a12 ± 2.6 | a44.84 ± 8.79 | a15.71 ± 10.01 | a0.36 ± 0.08 |
mean ± standard deviation; DH dehydrogenase activity, UR urease activity, SS1 surfaces on the sandy substrate—approximately 500 m from the sedimentation pond, SS2 surfaces on the sandy substrate situated approximately 1500 m from the sedimentation pond; LS surfaces of the loam substrate, S areas under the direct influence of sediment, CS control for surfaces on the sandy substrate, CL control for surfaces on the loam substrate; different small letters in the upper index of the mean values mean significant differences
Fig. 2Distribution of the concentrations of zinc (Zn) in the topsoil in the study area
Fig. 3Distribution of the concentrations of lead (Pb) in the topsoil in the study area
Fig. 4Factorial plan and projection of variables in the soil properties on the factor-plane 1 × 2
Correlations between enzyme activities and soil characteristics
| Zn | Pb | Cd | pHH20 | pHKCl | C | Sand | Silt | Clay | Dist. 1 | Dist. 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DH | −0.33* | −0.27 | −0.19 | −0.28 | −0.30 | 0.55* | −0.63* | 0.56* | 0.51* | 0.53* | 0.30 |
| UR | −0.44* | −0.39* | −0.38* | −0.40* | −0.41* | 0.34* | −0.47* | 0.42* | 0.31* | 0.63* | 0.47* |
DH dehydrogenase activity, UR urease activity
*P < 0.05
Multiple regression analysis for enzymes activity based on soil characteristic. R 2 describes the percentage of explained variance, β is the regression coefficient for given equation parameter and p is the significance level for the equation parameter
| Enzyme activity |
| Equation parameter |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DH | 78 % | Pb | −0.0082 | 0.000024 |
| Organic C | 6.1631 | 0.000010 | ||
| UR | 48 % | Organic C | 0.8977 | 0.000013 |
| pHH2O | −0.3677 | 0.007790 | ||
| Pb | −0.0024 | 0.004631 |
DH dehydrogenase activity, UR urease activity
Fig. 5Microbial functional parameters in the topsoil of the study area (a) average well colour development (AWCD) and (b) richness (R) within Biolog EcoPlate. Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence intervals (n = 15). Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05)
Fig. 6Results of cluster analysis of different soils based on carbon source substrate utilization in EcoPlate
Fig. 7Results of cluster analysis for different soils based on metabolic profiles