Literature DB >> 27682145

Pre-Implantation Genetic Screening Techniques: Implications for Clinical Prenatal Diagnosis.

Stefan C Kane1, Elissa Willats, Sammya Bezerra Maia E Holanda Moura, Jonathan Hyett, Fabrício da Silva Costa.   

Abstract

Chromosomal aneuploidy is responsible for a significant proportion of pregnancy failures, whether conceived naturally or through in vitro fertilization (IVF). In an effort to improve the success rate of IVF, screening embryos for aneuploidy - or pre-implantation genetic screening (PGS) - has been proposed as a means of ensuring only euploid embryos are selected for transfer. Early PGS approaches were based on fluorescence in situ hybridization testing, and have been shown not to improve live birth rates. Recent developments in genetic testing technologies - such as next-generation sequencing and quantitative polymerase chain reaction, coupled with embryo biopsy at the blastocyst stage - have shown promise in improving IVF outcomes, but they remain to be validated in adequately powered, prospective randomized trials. The extent to which IVF with PGS lowers the a priori risk of aneuploidy in ongoing pregnancies so conceived has been poorly described, rendering it difficult to incorporate the potential benefit of PGS into existing prenatal aneuploidy screening regimens such as cell-free DNA testing or conventional combined nuchal translucency and maternal biochemistry assessment. Further data on the sensitivity and specificity of various forms of molecular PGS testing would improve our understanding of the effectiveness and accuracy of these technologies. This, in addition to further research into methods of risk combination and assessment, would allow us to help our patients make better- informed decisions about whether or not to proceed with invasive diagnostic tests.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27682145     DOI: 10.1159/000449381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther        ISSN: 1015-3837            Impact factor:   2.587


  6 in total

Review 1.  Mosaicism in Preimplantation Human Embryos: When Chromosomal Abnormalities Are the Norm.

Authors:  Rajiv C McCoy
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Rapid preimplantation genetic screening using a handheld, nanopore-based DNA sequencer.

Authors:  Shan Wei; Zachary R Weiss; Pallavi Gaur; Eric Forman; Zev Williams
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  A mathematical model for predicting the number of transferable blastocysts in next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic testing.

Authors:  Yunni Cai; Min Ding; YuTing Zhang; Yanxin Sun; Fei Lin; Zhenyu Diao; Jianjun Zhou
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Biobanking of different body fluids within the frame of IVF-a standard operating procedure to improve reproductive biology research.

Authors:  Michael Schenk; Berthold Huppertz; Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch; Darja Kastelic; Martina Hörmann-Kröpfl; Gregor Weiss
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Overall Blastocyst Quality, Trophectoderm Grade, and Inner Cell Mass Grade Predict Pregnancy Outcome in Euploid Blastocyst Transfer Cycles.

Authors:  Yan-Yu Zhao; Yang Yu; Xiao-Wei Zhang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.628

6.  Blastocyst Morphology Based on Uniform Time-Point Assessments is Correlated With Mosaic Levels in Embryos.

Authors:  Chien-Hong Chen; Chun-I Lee; Chun-Chia Huang; Hsiu-Hui Chen; Shu-Ting Ho; En-Hui Cheng; Pin-Yao Lin; Chung-I Chen; Tsung-Hsien Lee; Maw-Sheng Lee
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.599

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.