Sari Lepistö1,2, Noora Ellonen3, Mika Helminen4,5, Eija Paavilainen6. 1. Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Tampere, Finland. 2. School of Health Sciences, Nursing Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland. 3. School of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland. 4. School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland. 5. Science Centre, Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Tampere, Finland. 6. School of Health Sciences, Nursing Science, Etelä-Pohjanmaa Hospital District, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To describe the family health, functioning, social support and child maltreatment risk and associations between them in families expecting a baby. BACKGROUND: Finland was one of the first countries in banning corporal punishment against children over 30 years ago. Despite of this, studies have shown that parents physically abuse their children. In addition, professionals struggle in intervention of this phenomenon. Abusive parents should be recognised and helped before actual violent behaviour. DESIGN: A follow-up case-control study, with a supportive intervention in the case group (families with a heightened risk) in maternity and child welfare clinics. The baseline results of families are described here. METHODS: Child maltreatment risk in families expecting a baby was measured by Child Abuse Potential Inventory. The health and functioning was measured by Family Health, Functioning and Social Support Scale. Data included 380 families. RESULTS: A total of 78 families had increased risk for child maltreatment. Heightened risk was associated with partners' age, mothers' education, partners' father's mental health problems, mothers' worry about partners' drinking and mothers' difficulties in talking about the family's problems. Risk was associated with family functioning and health. Families with risk received a less support from maternity clinics. Families with child maltreatment risk and related factors were found. CONCLUSIONS: This knowledge can be applied for supporting families both during pregnancy and after the baby is born. Professionals working with families in maternity clinics need tools to recognise families with risk and aid a discussion with them about the family life situation. The Child Abuse Potential, as a part of evaluating the family life situation, seems to prove a useful tool in identifying families at risk. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The results offer a valid and useful tool for recognising families with risk and provide knowledge about high-risk family situations.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To describe the family health, functioning, social support and child maltreatment risk and associations between them in families expecting a baby. BACKGROUND: Finland was one of the first countries in banning corporal punishment against children over 30 years ago. Despite of this, studies have shown that parents physically abuse their children. In addition, professionals struggle in intervention of this phenomenon. Abusive parents should be recognised and helped before actual violent behaviour. DESIGN: A follow-up case-control study, with a supportive intervention in the case group (families with a heightened risk) in maternity and child welfare clinics. The baseline results of families are described here. METHODS:Child maltreatment risk in families expecting a baby was measured by Child Abuse Potential Inventory. The health and functioning was measured by Family Health, Functioning and Social Support Scale. Data included 380 families. RESULTS: A total of 78 families had increased risk for child maltreatment. Heightened risk was associated with partners' age, mothers' education, partners' father's mental health problems, mothers' worry about partners' drinking and mothers' difficulties in talking about the family's problems. Risk was associated with family functioning and health. Families with risk received a less support from maternity clinics. Families with child maltreatment risk and related factors were found. CONCLUSIONS: This knowledge can be applied for supporting families both during pregnancy and after the baby is born. Professionals working with families in maternity clinics need tools to recognise families with risk and aid a discussion with them about the family life situation. The Child Abuse Potential, as a part of evaluating the family life situation, seems to prove a useful tool in identifying families at risk. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The results offer a valid and useful tool for recognising families with risk and provide knowledge about high-risk family situations.
Authors: Sari Johanna Lepistö; Noora Ellonen; Heidi Eveliina Rantanen; Maaret Kristiina Vuorenmaa; Mika Tapio Helminen; Eija Paavilainen Journal: Children (Basel) Date: 2022-02-16
Authors: Noora Ellonen; Heidi Rantanen; Sari Lepistö; Mika Helminen; Eija Paavilainen Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2019-01-28 Impact factor: 2.581
Authors: Noora Ellonen; Heidi Rantanen; Sari Lepistö; Mika Helminen; Eija Paavilainen Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2019-05-06 Impact factor: 2.581