Literature DB >> 27681521

Efficacy and Effects of Parenteral Pethidine or Meptazinol and Regional Analgesia for Pain Relief during Delivery. A Comparative Observational Study.

J Singer1, A Jank2, S Amara2, P D H Stepan2, U Kaisers1, C Hoehne1.   

Abstract

Background: Peripartum anesthesia may consist of parenteral opioids and/or regional analgesia. There is only limited data in the literature comparing both methods in daily obstetric practice. This observational study investigated the opioids pethidine and meptazinol as well as regional analgesics with regard to their administration, efficacy, side effects and subjective maternal satisfaction with therapy. The rates of secondary regional analgesia administration after administration of the respective opioid served as a means of evaluating treatment.
Methods: This study collected data on pain management during vaginal delivery in a German university hospital over a twelve month period. Severity of pain was measured intrapartum using a numerical rating scale. Maternal, neonatal and delivery-related data were obtained postpartum from the clinical records and from the mothers using a questionnaire.
Results: The study is based on data obtained from 449 deliveries. Pain relief achieved by the administration of pethidine and meptazinol was similarly low; maternal satisfaction with the respective therapy was high. Meptazinol was usually administered intravenously (83 % vs. 6 %; p < 0.001), repeatedly (27 % vs. 6 %; p < 0.001) and closer to the birth (1.9 ± 2.7 h vs. 2.6 ± 2.8 h; p < 0.05) compared to pethidine. Secondary regional analgesia was more common after the administration of pethidine (16 % vs. 8 %; p < 0.05). Regional analgesia resulted in greater pain relief compared to opioid therapy (78 % vs. 24 % after 30 min; p < 0.001) and was associated with longer times to delivery (7.6 ± 2.5 h vs. 5.7 ± 2.5 h; p < 0.001) and higher levels of maternal satisfaction with therapy (6.1 ± 1.2 vs. 4.8 ± 1.6 on a 7-point scale; p < 0.001).
Conclusion: In daily clinical practice, meptazinol can be adapted more readily to changes during birth and requires less secondary analgesia. Regional neuraxial analgesia was found to be an efficacious and safe way of managing labor pain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  obstetrics; pain therapy; regional anesthesia

Year:  2016        PMID: 27681521      PMCID: PMC5033648          DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-111009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


  23 in total

Review 1.  Rates of caesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery in nulliparous women after low concentration epidural infusions or opioid analgesia: systematic review.

Authors:  E H C Liu; A T H Sia
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-28

2.  Epidural block or parenteral pethidine as analgesic in labour; a randomized study concerning progress in labour and instrumental deliveries.

Authors:  T Philipsen; N H Jensen
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 3.  The pain and discomfort of labor and birth.

Authors:  N K Lowe
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  1996-01

Review 4.  Labour analgesia and the baby: good news is no news.

Authors:  Felicity Reynolds
Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 2.603

Review 5.  Parenteral opioids for maternal pain relief in labour.

Authors:  Roz Ullman; Lesley A Smith; Ethel Burns; Rintaro Mori; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-09-08

6.  Severity of labour pain: influence of physical as well as psychologic variables.

Authors:  R Melzack; R Kinch; P Dobkin; M Lebrun; P Taenzer
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1984-03-01       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  A comparison of analgesia and suppression of oxytocin release by opiates.

Authors:  G Clarke; D M Wright
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Pethidine compared with meptazinol during labour. A prospective randomised double-blind study in 1100 patients.

Authors:  C E Morrison; D Dutton; H Howie; H Gilmour
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 9.  Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Leanne Jones; Mohammad Othman; Therese Dowswell; Zarko Alfirevic; Simon Gates; Mary Newburn; Susan Jordan; Tina Lavender; James P Neilson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-03-14

Review 10.  Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour.

Authors:  Millicent Anim-Somuah; Rebecca Md Smyth; Leanne Jones
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-12-07
View more
  3 in total

1.  [Pain therapy in obstetrics].

Authors:  J Wallenborn; I Kühnert; D O Chebac; P Kranke
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  Effect of Entonox for pain management in labor: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Sepideh Gareh Sheyklo; Sakineh Hajebrahimi; Ahmad Moosavi; Fatemeh Pournaghi-Azar; Saber Azami-Aghdash; Morteza Ghojazadeh
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2017-12-25

Review 3.  The Mechanisms Involved in Morphine Addiction: An Overview.

Authors:  Joanna Listos; Małgorzata Łupina; Sylwia Talarek; Antonina Mazur; Jolanta Orzelska-Górka; Jolanta Kotlińska
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.