Ricardo Andrade1,2, Martin Wannagat1,2, Cecilia C Klein1,2, Vicente Acuña3, Alberto Marchetti-Spaccamela1,4, Paulo V Milreu5, Leen Stougie1,6,7, Marie-France Sagot1,2. 1. Erable team, INRIA Grenoble Rhône-Alpes, 655 Avenue de l'Europe, 38330 Montbonnot Saint-Martin, France. 2. UMR CNRS 5558, LBBE, "Biométrie et Biologie évolutive", Université Lyon 1, 43 bd du 11 Novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne, France. 3. Center for Mathematical Modeling (UMI 2807 CNRS), University of Chile, Beauchef 851, 837 0456 Santiago de Chile, Chile. 4. Sapienza University of Rome, Via Ariosto 25, 00185 Rome, Italy. 5. Applied Research Department, Tecsinapse, São Paulo, Brazil. 6. CWI, Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 7. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: What an organism needs at least from its environment to produce a set of metabolites, e.g. target(s) of interest and/or biomass, has been called a minimal precursor set. Early approaches to enumerate all minimal precursor sets took into account only the topology of the metabolic network (topological precursor sets). Due to cycles and the stoichiometric values of the reactions, it is often not possible to produce the target(s) from a topological precursor set in the sense that there is no feasible flux. Although considering the stoichiometry makes the problem harder, it enables to obtain biologically reasonable precursor sets that we call stoichiometric. Recently a method to enumerate all minimal stoichiometric precursor sets was proposed in the literature. The relationship between topological and stoichiometric precursor sets had however not yet been studied. RESULTS: Such relationship between topological and stoichiometric precursor sets is highlighted. We also present two algorithms that enumerate all minimal stoichiometric precursor sets. The first one is of theoretical interest only and is based on the above mentioned relationship. The second approach solves a series of mixed integer linear programming problems. We compared the computed minimal precursor sets to experimentally obtained growth media of several Escherichia coli strains using genome-scale metabolic networks. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the second approach efficiently enumerates minimal precursor sets taking stoichiometry into account, and allows for broad in silico studies of strains or species interactions that may help to understand e.g. pathotype and niche-specific metabolic capabilities. sasita is written in Java, uses cplex as LP solver and can be downloaded together with all networks and input files used in this paper at http://www.sasita.gforge.inria.fr.
BACKGROUND: What an organism needs at least from its environment to produce a set of metabolites, e.g. target(s) of interest and/or biomass, has been called a minimal precursor set. Early approaches to enumerate all minimal precursor sets took into account only the topology of the metabolic network (topological precursor sets). Due to cycles and the stoichiometric values of the reactions, it is often not possible to produce the target(s) from a topological precursor set in the sense that there is no feasible flux. Although considering the stoichiometry makes the problem harder, it enables to obtain biologically reasonable precursor sets that we call stoichiometric. Recently a method to enumerate all minimal stoichiometric precursor sets was proposed in the literature. The relationship between topological and stoichiometric precursor sets had however not yet been studied. RESULTS: Such relationship between topological and stoichiometric precursor sets is highlighted. We also present two algorithms that enumerate all minimal stoichiometric precursor sets. The first one is of theoretical interest only and is based on the above mentioned relationship. The second approach solves a series of mixed integer linear programming problems. We compared the computed minimal precursor sets to experimentally obtained growth media of several Escherichia coli strains using genome-scale metabolic networks. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the second approach efficiently enumerates minimal precursor sets taking stoichiometry into account, and allows for broad in silico studies of strains or species interactions that may help to understand e.g. pathotype and niche-specific metabolic capabilities. sasita is written in Java, uses cplex as LP solver and can be downloaded together with all networks and input files used in this paper at http://www.sasita.gforge.inria.fr.
Entities:
Keywords:
Metabolic network; Minimal precursor sets; Mixed integer linear programming
Authors: Luis F de Figueiredo; Adam Podhorski; Angel Rubio; Christoph Kaleta; John E Beasley; Stefan Schuster; Francisco J Planes Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2009-09-30 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Chuan-Sheng Lin; Chih-Jung Chang; Chia-Chen Lu; Jan Martel; David M Ojcius; Yun-Fei Ko; John D Young; Hsin-Chih Lai Journal: Biomed J Date: 2014 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Mary P Leatham; Swati Banerjee; Steven M Autieri; Regino Mercado-Lubo; Tyrrell Conway; Paul S Cohen Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2009-04-13 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Andrew J Fabich; Shari A Jones; Fatema Z Chowdhury; Amanda Cernosek; April Anderson; Darren Smalley; J Wesley McHargue; G Aaron Hightower; Joel T Smith; Steven M Autieri; Mary P Leatham; Jeremy J Lins; Regina L Allen; David C Laux; Paul S Cohen; Tyrrell Conway Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2008-01-07 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Jonathan M Monk; Pep Charusanti; Ramy K Aziz; Joshua A Lerman; Ned Premyodhin; Jeffrey D Orth; Adam M Feist; Bernhard Ø Palsson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-11-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Steven Eker; Markus Krummenacker; Alexander G Shearer; Ashish Tiwari; Ingrid M Keseler; Carolyn Talcott; Peter D Karp Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2013-03-27 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: María P Cortés; Sebastián N Mendoza; Dante Travisany; Alexis Gaete; Anne Siegel; Verónica Cambiazo; Alejandro Maass Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2017-12-11 Impact factor: 5.640