Shannon D Armbruster1, Jaejoon Song2, Andrea Bradford3, Cindy L Carmack4, Karen H Lu3, Karen M Basen-Engquist5. 1. Departments of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Electronic address: SDArmbruster@mdanderson.org. 2. Departments of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA. 3. Departments of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA. 4. Departments of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA. 5. Departments of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Sexual dysfunction is common in endometrial cancer survivors (ECS). Our group previously tested a six-month exercise intervention in ECS. We performed a secondary analysis to determine intervention's impact on sexual health. METHODS: We studied 100 post-treatment Stage I-IIIa sedentary ECS who participated in a non-controlled, single-arm, home-based exercise intervention utilizing telephone counseling, printed material, and pedometers. Quality-of-life and physical activity measures were collected at baseline and six months. Sexual function (SF) and sexual interest (SI) scores were extracted from the QLACS questionnaire. RESULTS: Baseline SF and SI were lower in survivors with less than a four-year college degree (P<0.001). Baseline SI was higher in survivors who were married or living with a significant other (P=0.012). No significant differences in SF or SI were observed based on obesity status, race, time since diagnosis, or treatment type. Post-intervention, mean SF score improved (P=0.002), 51% of participants had improved SI, and 43% had improved SF. When controlled for age and time since diagnosis, a one-hour increase in weekly physical activity was associated with a 6.5% increased likelihood of improved SI (P=0.04). Increased physical activity was not associated with improved SF. CONCLUSIONS: Although causation cannot be determined in this study, the correlation between receipt of an exercise intervention and improved sexual health for ECS is a novel finding. This finding suggests a role for physical activity as a strategy to improve the sexual health of ECS, which our group is examining in a larger prospective study.
OBJECTIVE:Sexual dysfunction is common in endometrial cancer survivors (ECS). Our group previously tested a six-month exercise intervention in ECS. We performed a secondary analysis to determine intervention's impact on sexual health. METHODS: We studied 100 post-treatment Stage I-IIIa sedentary ECS who participated in a non-controlled, single-arm, home-based exercise intervention utilizing telephone counseling, printed material, and pedometers. Quality-of-life and physical activity measures were collected at baseline and six months. Sexual function (SF) and sexual interest (SI) scores were extracted from the QLACS questionnaire. RESULTS: Baseline SF and SI were lower in survivors with less than a four-year college degree (P<0.001). Baseline SI was higher in survivors who were married or living with a significant other (P=0.012). No significant differences in SF or SI were observed based on obesity status, race, time since diagnosis, or treatment type. Post-intervention, mean SF score improved (P=0.002), 51% of participants had improved SI, and 43% had improved SF. When controlled for age and time since diagnosis, a one-hour increase in weekly physical activity was associated with a 6.5% increased likelihood of improved SI (P=0.04). Increased physical activity was not associated with improved SF. CONCLUSIONS: Although causation cannot be determined in this study, the correlation between receipt of an exercise intervention and improved sexual health for ECS is a novel finding. This finding suggests a role for physical activity as a strategy to improve the sexual health of ECS, which our group is examining in a larger prospective study.
Authors: J Zabora; K BrintzenhofeSzoc; P Jacobsen; B Curbow; S Piantadosi; C Hooker; A Owens; L Derogatis Journal: Psychosomatics Date: 2001 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.386
Authors: K Basen-Engquist; C Carmack; J Brown; A Jhingran; G Baum; J Song; S Scruggs; M C Swartz; M G Cox; K H Lu Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Diana D Jeffery; Lisa Barbera; Barbara L Andersen; Amy K Siston; Anuja Jhingran; Shirley R Baron; Jennifer Barsky Reese; Deborah J Coady; Jeanne Carter; Kathryn E Flynn Journal: J Psychosoc Oncol Date: 2015
Authors: Leen Aerts; Paul Enzlin; Johan Verhaeghe; Willy Poppe; Ignace Vergote; Frédéric Amant Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2014-11-17 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Bernardine M Pinto; Georita M Frierson; Carolyn Rabin; Joseph J Trunzo; Bess H Marcus Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-05-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mashael Turqi Alanazi; Nouf Turqi Alanazi; Mona A Alfadeel; Bussma Ahmed Bugis Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-09-30 Impact factor: 3.603