| Literature DB >> 27678224 |
Ritu Jindal1, Rajwinder Kaur2.
Abstract
For the pedodontic team, a child's dental anxiety poses major management problems. Previously, wide variety of aversive techniques have been used with varying success rates to manage anxious child patients. The present trend advocates the use of nonaversive techniques like distraction in the management of anxious pediatric patients. So the aim of this study is to compare the effect of audio distraction with the normal set up operatory. Thirty patients of age between 4 and 8 years were included in the study. Each patient had gone through four dental visits. Anxiety was measured using Venham's picture test. The values obtained were tabulated and statistical analysis and concluded that audio distraction did decrease the level of anxiety in anxious pediatric dental patients to a significant level during the restorative procedure visit (3rd) and invasive procedure visit (4th).Entities:
Keywords: Dental anxiety; Music.
Year: 2011 PMID: 27678224 PMCID: PMC5034076 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1107
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Clin Pediatr Dent ISSN: 0974-7052
Fig. 1Patient under control group
Fig. 2Patient under music group
Fig. 3Venham’s picture test
Table 1: Means
| Control | Mean | 6.00 | 6.50 | 6.57 | 5.07 | ||||||
| group | N | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | ||||||
| Std. deviation | 0.000 | 1.092 | 1.222 | 0.730 | |||||||
| Minimum | 6 | 5 | 4 | 4 | |||||||
| Maximum | 6 | 8 | 8 | 6 | |||||||
| Median | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.50 | 5.00 | |||||||
| Music | Mean | 6.00 | 6.25 | 5.56 | 4.38 | ||||||
| group | N | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | ||||||
| Std. deviation | 0.000 | 0.577 | 0.727 | 0.885 | |||||||
| Minimum | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | |||||||
| Maximum | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | |||||||
| Median | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 4.00 | |||||||
| Total | Mean | 6.00 | 6.37 | 6.03 | 4.70 | ||||||
| N | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |||||||
| Std. deviation | 0.000 | 0.850 | 1.098 | 0.877 | |||||||
| Minimum | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | |||||||
| Maximum | 6 | 8 | 8 | 6 | |||||||
| Median | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 5.00 |
Table 2: Mann-Whitney test
| 1st visit | Control group | 15 | 15.50 | 217.00 | |||||
| Music group | 15 | 15.50 | 248.00 | ||||||
| Total | 30 | ||||||||
| 2nd visit | Control group | 15 | 16.11 | 225.50 | |||||
| Music group | 15 | 14.97 | 239.50 | ||||||
| Total | 30 | ||||||||
| 3rd visit | Control group | 15 | 19.64 | 275.00 | |||||
| Music group | 15 | 11.88 | 190.00 | ||||||
| Total | 30 | ||||||||
| 4th visit | Control group | 15 | 19.07 | 267.00 | |||||
| Music group | 15 | 12.38 | 198.00 | ||||||
| Total | 30 |
Table 3: Test of significance
| p-value | 1.000 | 0.694 | 0.011* | 0.028* |
*Signify p < 0.005