Literature DB >> 27678218

How to quantify the temporal storage effect using simulations instead of math.

Stephen P Ellner1, Robin E Snyder2, Peter B Adler3.   

Abstract

The storage effect has become a core concept in community ecology, explaining how environmental fluctuations can promote coexistence and maintain biodiversity. However, limitations of existing theory have hindered empirical applications: the need for detailed mathematical analysis whenever the study system requires a new model, and restricted theory for structured populations. We present a new approach that overcomes both these limitations. We show how temporal storage effect can be quantified by Monte Carlo simulations in a wide range of models for competing species. We use the lottery model and a generic integral projection model (IPM) to introduce ideas, and present two empirical applications: (1) algal species in a chemostat with variable temperature, showing that the storage effect can operate without a long-lived life stage and (2) a sagebrush steppe community IPM. Our results highlight the need for careful modelling of nonlinearities so that conclusions are not driven by unrecognised model constraints.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coexistence; competition; environmental variability; integral projection model; storage effect; structured population model

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27678218     DOI: 10.1111/ele.12672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  8 in total

1.  Species coexistence through simultaneous fluctuation-dependent mechanisms.

Authors:  Andrew D Letten; Manpreet K Dhami; Po-Ju Ke; Tadashi Fukami
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Abiotic niche partitioning and negative density dependence drive tree seedling survival in a tropical forest.

Authors:  Daniel J Johnson; Richard Condit; Stephen P Hubbell; Liza S Comita
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Temporally auto-correlated predator attacks structure ecological communities.

Authors:  Sebastian J Schreiber
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.812

4.  Permanence via invasion graphs: incorporating community assembly into modern coexistence theory.

Authors:  Josef Hofbauer; Sebastian J Schreiber
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 2.164

5.  Consumer-resource dynamics is an eco-evolutionary process in a natural plankton community.

Authors:  Lindsay R Schaffner; Lynn Govaert; Luc De Meester; Stephen P Ellner; Eliza Fairchild; Brooks E Miner; Lars G Rudstam; Piet Spaak; Nelson G Hairston
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 15.460

6.  Complex marine microbial communities partition metabolism of scarce resources over the diel cycle.

Authors:  Daniel Muratore; Angela K Boysen; Matthew J Harke; Kevin W Becker; John R Casey; Sacha N Coesel; Daniel R Mende; Samuel T Wilson; Frank O Aylward; John M Eppley; Alice Vislova; Shengyun Peng; Rogelio A Rodriguez-Gonzalez; Stephen J Beckett; E Virginia Armbrust; Edward F DeLong; David M Karl; Angelicque E White; Jonathan P Zehr; Benjamin A S Van Mooy; Sonya T Dyhrman; Anitra E Ingalls; Joshua S Weitz
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 19.100

7.  How the storage effect and the number of temporal niches affect biodiversity in stochastic and seasonal environments.

Authors:  Immanuel Meyer; Bnaya Steinmetz; Nadav M Shnerb
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Quantifying invasibility.

Authors:  Jayant Pande; Yehonatan Tsubery; Nadav M Shnerb
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 11.274

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.