| Literature DB >> 27678146 |
Stefan Hellebrandt1, Sang Soo Lee2, Karah E Knope2, Aaron J Lussier3, Joanne E Stubbs4, Peter J Eng4, L Soderholm2, Paul Fenter2, Moritz Schmidt1.
Abstract
X-ray scattering techniques [in situ resonant anomalous X-ray reflectivity (RAXR) and specular crystal truncation rods (CTR)] were used to compare muscovite (001) surfaces in contact with solutions containing either 0.1 mM plutonyl(VI) or 1 mM uranyl(VI) at pH = 3.2 ± 0.2, I(NaCl) = 0.1 M, as well as in situ grazing-incidence X-ray absorption near-edge structure (GI XANES) spectroscopy and ex situ alpha spectrometry. Details of the surface coverage are found to be very different. In the case of Pu, alpha spectrometry finds a surface coverage of 8.3 Pu/AUC (AUC = 46.72 Å2, the unit cell area), far in excess of the 0.5 Pu/AUC expected for ionic adsorption of PuO22+. GI XANES results show that Pu is predominantly tetravalent on the surface, and the CTR/RAXR results show that the adsorbed Pu is broadly distributed. Taken together with previous findings, the results are consistent with adsorption of Pu in the form of Pu(IV)-oxo-nanoparticles. In contrast, uranyl shows only negligible, if any, adsorption according to all methods applied. These results are discussed and compared within the context of known Pu and U redox chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27678146 DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02513
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Langmuir ISSN: 0743-7463 Impact factor: 3.882