Literature DB >> 27678099

Efficacy, Safety, and Acceptability of Low-Dose Mifepristone and Self-Administered Misoprostol for Ultra-Early Medical Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Cui-Lan Li1, Li-Ping Song1, Shi-Yan Tang1, Lee Jaden Gil Yu-Kang Zhou2, Hong He1, Xue-Tang Mo1, Yi-Ming Liao1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of low-dose mifepristone combined with self-administered misoprostol for ultra-early medical abortion. A total of 744 women with ultra-early pregnancy (amenorrhea ≤35 days) who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. Equal numbers of participants were allocated randomly to the hospital administration and self-administration groups. All participants took 75 mg mifepristone at the initial visit and 400 µg oral misoprostol 24 hours later in the hospital or by self-administration. The primary end point was complete abortion. Secondary end points were rates of unscheduled reattendance, time required for and cost of hospital observation and follow-up, vaginal bleeding, adverse effects, menstrual disturbance in the posttreatment period, and satisfaction rating. No differences in the rates of complete abortion, unscheduled reattendance, vaginal bleeding, adverse effects, or return of posttreatment menstruation were observed. The time required for (and costs of) hospital observation and follow-up per participant was 557.82 minutes (and US$40.12) in the hospital administration group and 18.46 minutes (and US$1.96) in the self-administration group (both P < .001). Satisfaction rates were similar in both groups, but the rates of "very satisfied" responses (87.60% vs 25.41%) and follow-up compliance (loss to follow-up, 0.45% vs 7.70%) were higher in the self-administration group (both P < .001). Low-dose mifepristone combined with self-administered misoprostol for ultra-early pregnancy termination was as effective and safe as hospital administration, with greater acceptability and lower cost to the women.

Entities:  

Keywords:  medical abortion; mifepristone; misoprostol; self-administration; ultra-early pregnancy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27678099     DOI: 10.1177/1933719116669055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Sci        ISSN: 1933-7191            Impact factor:   3.060


  6 in total

Review 1.  Medical methods for first trimester abortion.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Kunyan Zhou; Dan Shan; Xiaoyan Luo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-24

2.  Mifepristone and Misoprostol for Undesired Pregnancy of Unknown Location.

Authors:  Alisa B Goldberg; Isabel R Fulcher; Jennifer Fortin; Rebecca K Hofer; Alex Cottrill; Divya Dethier; Allison Gilbert; Elizabeth Janiak; Danielle Roncari
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 7.623

3.  Self-management of first trimester medical termination of pregnancy: a qualitative study of women's experiences.

Authors:  C Purcell; S Cameron; J Lawton; A Glasier; J Harden
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Self care interventions for sexual and reproductive health and rights: costs, benefits, and financing.

Authors:  Michelle Remme; Manjulaa Narasimhan; David Wilson; Moazzam Ali; Lavanya Vijayasingham; Fatima Ghani; Pascale Allotey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-04-01

5.  Self-administered versus provider-administered medical abortion.

Authors:  Katherine Gambir; Caron Kim; Kelly Ann Necastro; Bela Ganatra; Thoai D Ngo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-03-09

Review 6.  The mesoeconomics of abortion: A scoping review and analysis of the economic effects of abortion on health systems.

Authors:  Samantha R Lattof; Ernestina Coast; Yana van der Meulen Rodgers; Brittany Moore; Cheri Poss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.