| Literature DB >> 27677789 |
Kai Xue1, Mengting M Yuan2, Jianping Xie3, Dejun Li4, Yujia Qin2, Lauren E Hale2, Liyou Wu2, Ye Deng5, Zhili He2, Joy D Van Nostrand2, Yiqi Luo4, James M Tiedje6, Jizhong Zhou7.
Abstract
Clipping (i.e., harvesting aboveground plant biomass) is common in agriculture and for bioenergy production. However, microbial responses to clipping in the context of climate warming are poorly understood. We investigated the interactive effects of grassland warming and clipping on soil properties and plant and microbial communities, in particular, on microbial functional genes. Clipping alone did not change the plant biomass production, but warming and clipping combined increased the C4 peak biomass by 47% and belowground net primary production by 110%. Clipping alone and in combination with warming decreased the soil carbon input from litter by 81% and 75%, respectively. With less carbon input, the abundances of genes involved in degrading relatively recalcitrant carbon increased by 38% to 137% in response to either clipping or the combined treatment, which could weaken long-term soil carbon stability and trigger positive feedback with respect to warming. Clipping alone also increased the abundance of genes for nitrogen fixation, mineralization, and denitrification by 32% to 39%. Such potentially stimulated nitrogen fixation could help compensate for the 20% decline in soil ammonium levels caused by clipping alone and could contribute to unchanged plant biomass levels. Moreover, clipping tended to interact antagonistically with warming, especially with respect to effects on nitrogen cycling genes, demonstrating that single-factor studies cannot predict multifactorial changes. These results revealed that clipping alone or in combination with warming altered soil and plant properties as well as the abundance and structure of soil microbial functional genes. Aboveground biomass removal for biofuel production needs to be reconsidered, as the long-term soil carbon stability may be weakened. IMPORTANCE: Global change involves simultaneous alterations, including those caused by climate warming and land management practices (e.g., clipping). Data on the interactive effects of warming and clipping on ecosystems remain elusive, particularly in microbial ecology. This study found that clipping alters microbial responses to warming and demonstrated the effects of antagonistic interactions between clipping and warming on microbial functional genes. Clipping alone or combined with warming enriched genes degrading relatively recalcitrant carbon, likely reflecting the decreased quantity of soil carbon input from litter, which could weaken long-term soil C stability and trigger positive warming feedback. These results have important implications in assessing and predicting the consequences of global climate change and indicate that the removal of aboveground biomass for biofuel production may need to be reconsidered.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27677789 PMCID: PMC5040111 DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00976-16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mBio Impact factor: 7.867
Observed percent changes of soil and plant properties in response to warming or clipping alone, or their combination, the predicted additive effect of warming and clipping, and the types of the interaction
| Category | Parameter | Parameter value or | Type of interactive effect | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W | C | OE | PE | OE-PE | |||
| Soil properties | Temperature | 2007 | 0.84 | 8.97 | ||||
| Moisture | 2007 | −0.98 | −5.60 | 1.18 | Additive | |||
| Bulk density | 2005 | 2.17 | 4.31 | 11.21 | −6.90 | Additive | ||
| Total organic C | 2008 | 4.05 | −1.21 | 7.48 | 2.84 | 4.64 | Additive | |
| Labile C Pool 1 | 2008 | −0.69 | −7.44 | −1.86 | −8.13 | 6.27 | Additive | |
| Labile C pool 2 | 2008 | 12.90 | −2.21 | 13.32 | 10.69 | 2.63 | Additive | |
| Recalcitrant C pool | 2008 | 1.11 | 1.77 | 7.97 | 2.88 | 5.09 | Additive | |
| C derived from C4 plant | 2008 | 4.36 | 23.17 | −0.91 | Additive | |||
| Total N | 2008 | 0.79 | −3.23 | 5.01 | −2.44 | 7.45 | Additive | |
| NH4+ | 2007 | −6.56 | 1.40 | −26.40 | ||||
| NO3− | 2007 | −23.76 | −30.98 | −34.57 | −54.74 | 20.17 | Additive | |
| C/N ratio | 2008 | 2.80 | 1.47 | 0.34 | 4.27 | −3.93 | Additive | |
| 13C | 2008 | 2.14 | 8.74 | 0.50 | Additive | |||
| 15N | 2008 | 16.37 | −3.43 | 12.94 | ||||
| Phenol oxidase | 2008 | 3.49 | 39.71 | 19.77 | 19.94 | Additive | ||
| Soil respiration | Total | 2007 | 48.90 | 3.67 | Additive | |||
| PLFAs | Total PLFA | 2008 | 17.07 | 51.98 | 3.49 | Additive | ||
| Fungi/bacteria | 2008 | −6.92 | −13.84 | −0.82 | −20.76 | 19.94 | Additive | |
| Plant properties | C3 peak biomass | 2007 | 34.13 | 35.15 | 50.55 | 69.28 | −18.73 | Additive |
| C4 peak biomass | 2007 | 1.37 | 26.42 | 20.11 | Additive | |||
| BNPP | 2007 | 22.44 | 10.42 | 32.86 | ||||
| Litter | 2006 | 27.83 | −52.97 | −22.30 | Additive | |||
W, warming effect alone, calculated as 100% × (UW − UU)/UU, where UW and UU represent the averaged values in unclipped-warmed and unclipped-unwarmed plots, respectively.
C, clipping effect alone, calculated as 100% × (CU − UU)/UU, where CU represents the averaged values in clipped-unwarmed plots. The significance data are in bold font and labeled with *** where P = ≤0.01, ** where P = ≤0.05, and * where P = ≤0.10. The two-tailed paired t test was used for most variables, while the two-tailed permutation paired t test was used for C/N ratio and C4 peak biomass calculations.
OE, observed effect, calculated as 100% × (CW − UU)/UU, where CW represents the averaged values in clipped-warmed plots.
PE, predicted additive effect, calculated as [100% × (UW − UU)/UU +100% × (CU − UU)/UU].
Interactive effect is additive when PE does not differ significantly from OE, synergistic when PE is significantly smaller than OE, or antagonistic when PE is significantly larger than OE.
Pairwise dissimilarities tested by permutational multivariate analysis of variance (Adonis) for GeoChip-detected functional genes, 454 sequencing of 16S rRNA genes, and PLFA, all based on Horn dissimilarity distance
| Comparison | GeoChip | 454 sequencing | PLFA | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pr(> | Pr(> | Pr(> | ||||
| UW versus UU | 2.104 | 2.055 | 0.077 | 0.349 | 0.970 | |
| CU versus UU | 2.469 | 2.597 | 0.060 | 0.115 | 0.704 | |
| CW versus UU | 1.952 | 1.970 | 0.095 | 26.09 | ||
UU, unclipped-unwarmed communities; UW, unclipped-warmed communities; CU, clipped-unwarmed communities; CW, clipped-warmed communities. Bold values represent significance at P ≤ 0.05. F, F-test statistics; Pr(>F), p value, the probability of obtaining a larger F value from permutations than the F value based on actually observed data.
FIG 1 Signal changes of detected C degradation genes measured by GeoChip in response to treatments. Bars presented show means ± standard errors (n = 6 × gene probe number) of the signal intensities of the detected carbon degradation genes in response to warming alone (W), clipping alone (C), and their combination (W + C) compared with the control (unclipped-unwarmed treatment). Significance of treatment effect is indicated by *** where P = ≤0.01, ** where P = ≤0.05, and * where P = ≤0.10 and in the same colors as the bars for the different treatment groups. Significance of interaction between warming and clipping is labeled with ### where P = ≤0.01, ## where P = ≤0.05, and # where P = ≤0.10 (see Table S2 in the supplemental material).
FIG 2 Percentage signal changes of detected N cycling genes measured by GeoChip in response to treatments. The numbers corresponding to each gene represent the signal changes in percentage induced by warming alone (dark red), clipping alone (orange), and their combined treatment (yellow green) compared with the control (unclipped-unwarmed treatment) (n = 6 × gene probe number). Significance is indicated by *** where P = ≤0.01, ** where P = ≤0.05, and * where P = ≤0.10. Gray-colored genes are not represented in the version of GeoChip used in this study or were undetected. “na” means that the gene was not detected in control samples but was detected with the warming treatment alone, the clipping treatment alone, or the combined treatment.
FIG 3 Predicted and observed effects of combined warming and clipping treatment on C degradation and N genes based on GeoChip measurements. C degradation genes are plotted with open circles and N genes with filled circles. The observed effects were calculated as the signal difference between and (), where represents average gene signal intensity in clipped-warmed plots and represents that in unclipped-unwarmed plots. The predicted effects were the sum of individual effects of warming and clipping , where represents average gene signal intensity in unclipped-warmed plots and represents that in clipped-unwarmed plots. Points in 1:1 lines represent the additive responses to combined treatment (no interaction); points above and below the 1:1 line represent synergistic and antagonistic interactions, respectively. Significant interactions (P < 0.05) are shown in red for C degradation genes (1-amyA, 2-ara, 3-ara_fungi, 4-acetylglucosaminidase) and N cycling genes (5-nirK, 6-nosZ, 7-nifH). Error bars of predicted and observed effects were omitted for clarity. See Table S2 in the supplemental material for details.