Literature DB >> 27677666

A review of the carcinogenic potential of glyphosate by four independent expert panels and comparison to the IARC assessment.

Gary M Williams1, Marilyn Aardema2, John Acquavella3, Sir Colin Berry4, David Brusick5, Michele M Burns6, Joao Lauro Viana de Camargo7, David Garabrant8, Helmut A Greim9, Larry D Kier10, David J Kirkland11, Gary Marsh12, Keith R Solomon13, Tom Sorahan14, Ashley Roberts15, Douglas L Weed16.   

Abstract

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) published a monograph in 2015 concluding that glyphosate is "probably carcinogenic to humans" (Group 2A) based on limited evidence in humans and sufficient evidence in experimental animals. It was also concluded that there was strong evidence of genotoxicity and oxidative stress. Four Expert Panels have been convened for the purpose of conducting a detailed critique of the evidence in light of IARC's assessment and to review all relevant information pertaining to glyphosate exposure, animal carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, and epidemiologic studies. Two of the Panels (animal bioassay and genetic toxicology) also provided a critique of the IARC position with respect to conclusions made in these areas. The incidences of neoplasms in the animal bioassays were found not to be associated with glyphosate exposure on the basis that they lacked statistical strength, were inconsistent across studies, lacked dose-response relationships, were not associated with preneoplasia, and/or were not plausible from a mechanistic perspective. The overall weight of evidence from the genetic toxicology data supports a conclusion that glyphosate (including GBFs and AMPA) does not pose a genotoxic hazard and therefore, should not be considered support for the classification of glyphosate as a genotoxic carcinogen. The assessment of the epidemiological data found that the data do not support a causal relationship between glyphosate exposure and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma while the data were judged to be too sparse to assess a potential relationship between glyphosate exposure and multiple myeloma. As a result, following the review of the totality of the evidence, the Panels concluded that the data do not support IARC's conclusion that glyphosate is a "probable human carcinogen" and, consistent with previous regulatory assessments, further concluded that glyphosate is unlikely to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glyphosate; Roundup; aminomethylphosphoric acid; cancer; genotoxicity; herbicide

Year:  2016        PMID: 27677666     DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2016.1214677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  5 in total

Review 1.  Organophosphorus Compounds at 80: Some Old and New Issues.

Authors:  Lucio G Costa
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Toxic Effects of Glyphosate on the Nervous System: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carmen Costas-Ferreira; Rafael Durán; Lilian R F Faro
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 6.208

3.  Public Health and Independent Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Paolo Vineis
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Linking Environmental Exposures to Molecular Pathogenesis in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Subtypes.

Authors:  Leah Moubadder; Lauren E McCullough; Christopher R Flowers; Jean L Koff
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  The nitrate content of fresh and cooked vegetables and their health-related risks.

Authors:  Hamzeh Salehzadeh; Afshin Maleki; Reza Rezaee; Behzad Shahmoradi; Koen Ponnet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.