Literature DB >> 27677635

Dietitians' perceptions and experience of blenderised feeds for paediatric tube-feeding.

Janis Armstrong1, Elaine Buchanan2, Hazel Duncan2, Kathleen Ross3, Konstantinos Gerasimidis1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is an emerging interest in the use of blenderised food for tube-feeding (BFTF). This survey explored paediatric dietitians' perceptions and experiences of BFTF use.
DESIGN: A web-based questionnaire was distributed to the Paediatric group of the British Dietetic Association. The survey captured dietitians' personal opinions and experience supporting children on BFTF, and the perceptions of carers.
RESULTS: Of the 77 respondents, 19 were aware of professional guidelines and 63 had never received training on BFTF. Thirty-four would not recommend BFTF and 11 would advise against its use; yet 43 would recommend it to supplement commercial feeds. Fifty-seven would change their perception about BFTF if there were evidence-based guidelines. Forty-four would feel confident to support a patient using BFTF. Forty-three had previous experience supporting a patient with BFTF. The main concerns perceived by dietitians, pertinent to the use of BFTF, were nutritional inadequacy (n=71), tube blockages (n=64) and increased infection risk (n=59) but these were significantly higher than those experienced by themselves in clinical practice (p<0.001 for all three). A reduction in reflux and vomiting and increased carer involvement were the main perceived and observed benefits by both dietitians and carers.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of these feeds for tube-fed children is increasingly being seen as a viable choice. Dietitians experienced significantly fewer issues with the use of BFTF in clinical practice compared with their self-reported apprehensions in the survey. Well-controlled studies are now needed to objectively assess the benefits, risks, costs and practicality of BFTF. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blenderised feeds; children; contamination; enteral nutrition; nutritional adequacy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27677635     DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-310971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  4 in total

1.  Blenderized food tube feeding in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Amy Y Spurlock; Teresa W Johnson; Ali Pritchett; Leah Pierce; Jenna Hussey; Kelly Johnson; Holly Carter; Stephen L Davidson; Manpreet S Mundi; Lisa Epp; Ryan T Hurt
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 3.204

2.  'Your Tube': the role of different diets in children who are gastrostomy fed: protocol for a mixed methods exploratory sequential study.

Authors:  Johanna Taylor; Mark O'Neill; Jane Maddison; Gerry Richardson; Catherine Hewitt; Karen Horridge; Janet Cade; Alison McCarter; Bryony Beresford; Lorna Katharine Fraser
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Blenderised Tube Feeds vs. Commercial Formula: Which Is Better for Gastrostomy-Fed Children?

Authors:  Neha Chandrasekar; Kate Dehlsen; Steven T Leach; Usha Krishnan
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 6.706

Review 4.  Nutrition and preparation of blenderized tube feeding in children and adolescents with neurological impairment: A scoping review.

Authors:  Ghita Brekke; Anne Mette Terp Raun; Sarah B Sørensen; Karin Kok; Jette L Sørensen; Alfred P Born; Christian Mølgaard; Christina E Hoei-Hansen
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.204

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.