Literature DB >> 27677629

Setting population targets for mammals using body mass as a predictor of population persistence.

Jelle P Hilbers1, Luca Santini1,2, Piero Visconti3,4, Aafke M Schipper1,5, Cecilia Pinto6, Carlo Rondinini2, Mark A J Huijbregts1,5.   

Abstract

Conservation planning and biodiversity assessments need quantitative targets to optimize planning options and assess the adequacy of current species protection. However, targets aiming at persistence require population-specific data, which limit their use in favor of fixed and nonspecific targets, likely leading to unequal distribution of conservation efforts among species. We devised a method to derive equitable population targets; that is, quantitative targets of population size that ensure equal probabilities of persistence across a set of species and that can be easily inferred from species-specific traits. In our method, we used models of population dynamics across a range of life-history traits related to species' body mass to estimate minimum viable population targets. We applied our method to a range of body masses of mammals, from 2 g to 3825 kg. The minimum viable population targets decreased asymptotically with increasing body mass and were on the same order of magnitude as minimum viable population estimates from species- and context-specific studies. Our approach provides a compromise between pragmatic, nonspecific population targets and detailed context-specific estimates of population viability for which only limited data are available. It enables a first estimation of species-specific population targets based on a readily available trait and thus allows setting equitable targets for population persistence in large-scale and multispecies conservation assessments and planning.
© 2016 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.

Keywords:  allometry; alometría; análisis de viabilidad poblacional; biología de la conservación; conservation biology; conservation target; extinción; extinction; manejo de vida silvestre; minimum viable population; objetivo de conservación; población mínima viable; population viability analysis; vida silvestre; wildlife; wildlife management

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27677629     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  5 in total

1.  Global protected areas seem insufficient to safeguard half of the world's mammals from human-induced extinction.

Authors:  David R Williams; Carlo Rondinini; David Tilman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  A landscape-scale assessment of tropical mammals reveals the effects of habitat and anthropogenic disturbance on community occupancy.

Authors:  Nathalie Cavada; Rasmus Worsøe Havmøller; Nikolaj Scharff; Francesco Rovero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Applying habitat and population-density models to land-cover time series to inform IUCN Red List assessments.

Authors:  Luca Santini; Stuart H M Butchart; Carlo Rondinini; Ana Benítez-López; Jelle P Hilbers; Aafke M Schipper; Mirza Cengic; Joseph A Tobias; Mark A J Huijbregts
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Scaling the extinction vortex: Body size as a predictor of population dynamics close to extinction events.

Authors:  Nathan F Williams; Louise McRae; Robin Freeman; Pol Capdevila; Christopher F Clements
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  The paradoxical extinction of the most charismatic animals.

Authors:  Franck Courchamp; Ivan Jaric; Céline Albert; Yves Meinard; William J Ripple; Guillaume Chapron
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 8.029

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.